Cargando…

Theoretical axial wall angulation for rotational resistance form in an experimental-fixed partial denture

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the influence of long base lengths of a fixed partial denture (FPD) to rotational resistance with variation of vertical wall angulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Trigonometric calculations were done to determine the maximum wall angle needed to resist ro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bowley, John Francis, Kaye, Elizabeth Krall, Garcia, Raul Isidro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5582094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28874995
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.278
_version_ 1783261127705100288
author Bowley, John Francis
Kaye, Elizabeth Krall
Garcia, Raul Isidro
author_facet Bowley, John Francis
Kaye, Elizabeth Krall
Garcia, Raul Isidro
author_sort Bowley, John Francis
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the influence of long base lengths of a fixed partial denture (FPD) to rotational resistance with variation of vertical wall angulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Trigonometric calculations were done to determine the maximum wall angle needed to resist rotational displacement of an experimental-FPD model in 2-dimensional plane. The maximum wall angle calculation determines the greatest taper that resists rotation. Two different axes of rotation were used to test this model with five vertical abutment heights of 3-, 3.5-, 4-, 4.5-, and 5-mm. The two rotational axes were located on the mesial-side of the anterior abutment and the distal-side of the posterior abutment. Rotation of the FPD around the anterior axis was counter-clockwise, Posterior-Anterior (P-A) and clockwise, Anterior-Posterior (A-P) around the distal axis in the sagittal plane. RESULTS: Low levels of vertical wall taper, ≤ 10-degrees, were needed to resist rotational displacement in all wall height categories; 2–to–6–degrees is generally considered ideal, with 7–to–10–degrees as favorable to the long axis of the abutment. Rotation around both axes demonstrated that two axial walls of the FPD resisted rotational displacement in each direction. In addition, uneven abutment height combinations required the lowest wall angulations to achieve resistance in this study. CONCLUSION: The vertical height and angulation of FPD abutments, two rotational axes, and the long base lengths all play a role in FPD resistance form.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5582094
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55820942017-09-05 Theoretical axial wall angulation for rotational resistance form in an experimental-fixed partial denture Bowley, John Francis Kaye, Elizabeth Krall Garcia, Raul Isidro J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the influence of long base lengths of a fixed partial denture (FPD) to rotational resistance with variation of vertical wall angulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Trigonometric calculations were done to determine the maximum wall angle needed to resist rotational displacement of an experimental-FPD model in 2-dimensional plane. The maximum wall angle calculation determines the greatest taper that resists rotation. Two different axes of rotation were used to test this model with five vertical abutment heights of 3-, 3.5-, 4-, 4.5-, and 5-mm. The two rotational axes were located on the mesial-side of the anterior abutment and the distal-side of the posterior abutment. Rotation of the FPD around the anterior axis was counter-clockwise, Posterior-Anterior (P-A) and clockwise, Anterior-Posterior (A-P) around the distal axis in the sagittal plane. RESULTS: Low levels of vertical wall taper, ≤ 10-degrees, were needed to resist rotational displacement in all wall height categories; 2–to–6–degrees is generally considered ideal, with 7–to–10–degrees as favorable to the long axis of the abutment. Rotation around both axes demonstrated that two axial walls of the FPD resisted rotational displacement in each direction. In addition, uneven abutment height combinations required the lowest wall angulations to achieve resistance in this study. CONCLUSION: The vertical height and angulation of FPD abutments, two rotational axes, and the long base lengths all play a role in FPD resistance form. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2017-08 2017-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5582094/ /pubmed/28874995 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.278 Text en © 2017 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bowley, John Francis
Kaye, Elizabeth Krall
Garcia, Raul Isidro
Theoretical axial wall angulation for rotational resistance form in an experimental-fixed partial denture
title Theoretical axial wall angulation for rotational resistance form in an experimental-fixed partial denture
title_full Theoretical axial wall angulation for rotational resistance form in an experimental-fixed partial denture
title_fullStr Theoretical axial wall angulation for rotational resistance form in an experimental-fixed partial denture
title_full_unstemmed Theoretical axial wall angulation for rotational resistance form in an experimental-fixed partial denture
title_short Theoretical axial wall angulation for rotational resistance form in an experimental-fixed partial denture
title_sort theoretical axial wall angulation for rotational resistance form in an experimental-fixed partial denture
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5582094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28874995
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.278
work_keys_str_mv AT bowleyjohnfrancis theoreticalaxialwallangulationforrotationalresistanceforminanexperimentalfixedpartialdenture
AT kayeelizabethkrall theoreticalaxialwallangulationforrotationalresistanceforminanexperimentalfixedpartialdenture
AT garciaraulisidro theoreticalaxialwallangulationforrotationalresistanceforminanexperimentalfixedpartialdenture