Cargando…

Comparison of retention forces with various fabrication methods and materials in double crowns

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the retention force changes and wear behaviours of double-crown systems over long-term use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten groups, each consisting of six samples, were evaluated. Specifically, casting gold alloy primary crown - casting gold alloy seconda...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Çelik Güven, Melahat, Tuna, Meral, Bozdağ, Ergun, Öztürk, Gizem Nur, Bayraktar, Gulsen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5582098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28874999
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.308
_version_ 1783261128638332928
author Çelik Güven, Melahat
Tuna, Meral
Bozdağ, Ergun
Öztürk, Gizem Nur
Bayraktar, Gulsen
author_facet Çelik Güven, Melahat
Tuna, Meral
Bozdağ, Ergun
Öztürk, Gizem Nur
Bayraktar, Gulsen
author_sort Çelik Güven, Melahat
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the retention force changes and wear behaviours of double-crown systems over long-term use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten groups, each consisting of six samples, were evaluated. Specifically, casting gold alloy primary crown - casting gold alloy secondary crown (AA), laser sintering primary crown - laser sintering secondary crown (LL), casting Cr alloy primary crown - casting Cr alloy secondary crown, (CC) zirconia primary crown - electroformed secondary crown (ZA), and CAD/CAM titanium alloy primary crown - CAD/CAM titanium alloy secondary crown (TT) groups were evaluated at cone angles of 4° and 6°. The samples were subjected to 5,000 insertion-separation cycles in artificial saliva, and the retention forces were measured every 500 cycles. The wear levels were analyzed via SEM at the beginning and end of the 5,000 cycles. RESULTS: In all samples, the retention forces increased when the conus angle decreased. The highest initial and final retention force values were found in the LL-4° group (32.89 N-32.65 N), and the lowest retention force values were found in the ZA6° group (5.41 N-6.27 N). The ZA groups' samples showed the least change in the retention force, and no wear was observed. In the other groups, wear was observed mostly in the primary crowns. CONCLUSION: More predictable, clinically relevant, and less excursive retention forces can be observed in the ZA groups. The retention force values of the LL groups were statically similar to those of the other groups, except the ZA groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5582098
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55820982017-09-05 Comparison of retention forces with various fabrication methods and materials in double crowns Çelik Güven, Melahat Tuna, Meral Bozdağ, Ergun Öztürk, Gizem Nur Bayraktar, Gulsen J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the retention force changes and wear behaviours of double-crown systems over long-term use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten groups, each consisting of six samples, were evaluated. Specifically, casting gold alloy primary crown - casting gold alloy secondary crown (AA), laser sintering primary crown - laser sintering secondary crown (LL), casting Cr alloy primary crown - casting Cr alloy secondary crown, (CC) zirconia primary crown - electroformed secondary crown (ZA), and CAD/CAM titanium alloy primary crown - CAD/CAM titanium alloy secondary crown (TT) groups were evaluated at cone angles of 4° and 6°. The samples were subjected to 5,000 insertion-separation cycles in artificial saliva, and the retention forces were measured every 500 cycles. The wear levels were analyzed via SEM at the beginning and end of the 5,000 cycles. RESULTS: In all samples, the retention forces increased when the conus angle decreased. The highest initial and final retention force values were found in the LL-4° group (32.89 N-32.65 N), and the lowest retention force values were found in the ZA6° group (5.41 N-6.27 N). The ZA groups' samples showed the least change in the retention force, and no wear was observed. In the other groups, wear was observed mostly in the primary crowns. CONCLUSION: More predictable, clinically relevant, and less excursive retention forces can be observed in the ZA groups. The retention force values of the LL groups were statically similar to those of the other groups, except the ZA groups. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2017-08 2017-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5582098/ /pubmed/28874999 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.308 Text en © 2017 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Çelik Güven, Melahat
Tuna, Meral
Bozdağ, Ergun
Öztürk, Gizem Nur
Bayraktar, Gulsen
Comparison of retention forces with various fabrication methods and materials in double crowns
title Comparison of retention forces with various fabrication methods and materials in double crowns
title_full Comparison of retention forces with various fabrication methods and materials in double crowns
title_fullStr Comparison of retention forces with various fabrication methods and materials in double crowns
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of retention forces with various fabrication methods and materials in double crowns
title_short Comparison of retention forces with various fabrication methods and materials in double crowns
title_sort comparison of retention forces with various fabrication methods and materials in double crowns
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5582098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28874999
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.308
work_keys_str_mv AT celikguvenmelahat comparisonofretentionforceswithvariousfabricationmethodsandmaterialsindoublecrowns
AT tunameral comparisonofretentionforceswithvariousfabricationmethodsandmaterialsindoublecrowns
AT bozdagergun comparisonofretentionforceswithvariousfabricationmethodsandmaterialsindoublecrowns
AT ozturkgizemnur comparisonofretentionforceswithvariousfabricationmethodsandmaterialsindoublecrowns
AT bayraktargulsen comparisonofretentionforceswithvariousfabricationmethodsandmaterialsindoublecrowns