Cargando…

Ancient whales did not filter feed with their teeth

The origin of baleen whales (Mysticeti), the largest animals on Earth, is closely tied to their signature filter-feeding strategy. Unlike their modern relatives, archaic whales possessed a well-developed, heterodont adult dentition. How these teeth were used, and what role their function and subsequ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hocking, David P., Marx, Felix G., Fitzgerald, Erich M. G., Evans, Alistair R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5582114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28855416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2017.0348
_version_ 1783261129589391360
author Hocking, David P.
Marx, Felix G.
Fitzgerald, Erich M. G.
Evans, Alistair R.
author_facet Hocking, David P.
Marx, Felix G.
Fitzgerald, Erich M. G.
Evans, Alistair R.
author_sort Hocking, David P.
collection PubMed
description The origin of baleen whales (Mysticeti), the largest animals on Earth, is closely tied to their signature filter-feeding strategy. Unlike their modern relatives, archaic whales possessed a well-developed, heterodont adult dentition. How these teeth were used, and what role their function and subsequent loss played in the emergence of filter feeding, is an enduring mystery. In particular, it has been suggested that elaborate tooth crowns may have enabled stem mysticetes to filter with their postcanine teeth in a manner analogous to living crabeater and leopard seals, thereby facilitating the transition to baleen-assisted filtering. Here we show that the teeth of archaic mysticetes are as sharp as those of terrestrial carnivorans, raptorial pinnipeds and archaeocetes, and thus were capable of capturing and processing prey. By contrast, the postcanine teeth of leopard and crabeater seals are markedly blunter, and clearly unsuited to raptorial feeding. Our results suggest that mysticetes never passed through a tooth-based filtration phase, and that the use of teeth and baleen in early whales was not functionally connected. Continued selection for tooth sharpness in archaic mysticetes is best explained by a feeding strategy that included both biting and suction, similar to that of most living pinnipeds and, probably, early toothed whales (Odontoceti).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5582114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55821142017-09-06 Ancient whales did not filter feed with their teeth Hocking, David P. Marx, Felix G. Fitzgerald, Erich M. G. Evans, Alistair R. Biol Lett Palaeontology The origin of baleen whales (Mysticeti), the largest animals on Earth, is closely tied to their signature filter-feeding strategy. Unlike their modern relatives, archaic whales possessed a well-developed, heterodont adult dentition. How these teeth were used, and what role their function and subsequent loss played in the emergence of filter feeding, is an enduring mystery. In particular, it has been suggested that elaborate tooth crowns may have enabled stem mysticetes to filter with their postcanine teeth in a manner analogous to living crabeater and leopard seals, thereby facilitating the transition to baleen-assisted filtering. Here we show that the teeth of archaic mysticetes are as sharp as those of terrestrial carnivorans, raptorial pinnipeds and archaeocetes, and thus were capable of capturing and processing prey. By contrast, the postcanine teeth of leopard and crabeater seals are markedly blunter, and clearly unsuited to raptorial feeding. Our results suggest that mysticetes never passed through a tooth-based filtration phase, and that the use of teeth and baleen in early whales was not functionally connected. Continued selection for tooth sharpness in archaic mysticetes is best explained by a feeding strategy that included both biting and suction, similar to that of most living pinnipeds and, probably, early toothed whales (Odontoceti). The Royal Society 2017-08 2017-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5582114/ /pubmed/28855416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2017.0348 Text en © 2017 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Palaeontology
Hocking, David P.
Marx, Felix G.
Fitzgerald, Erich M. G.
Evans, Alistair R.
Ancient whales did not filter feed with their teeth
title Ancient whales did not filter feed with their teeth
title_full Ancient whales did not filter feed with their teeth
title_fullStr Ancient whales did not filter feed with their teeth
title_full_unstemmed Ancient whales did not filter feed with their teeth
title_short Ancient whales did not filter feed with their teeth
title_sort ancient whales did not filter feed with their teeth
topic Palaeontology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5582114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28855416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2017.0348
work_keys_str_mv AT hockingdavidp ancientwhalesdidnotfilterfeedwiththeirteeth
AT marxfelixg ancientwhalesdidnotfilterfeedwiththeirteeth
AT fitzgeralderichmg ancientwhalesdidnotfilterfeedwiththeirteeth
AT evansalistairr ancientwhalesdidnotfilterfeedwiththeirteeth