Cargando…
Ancient whales did not filter feed with their teeth
The origin of baleen whales (Mysticeti), the largest animals on Earth, is closely tied to their signature filter-feeding strategy. Unlike their modern relatives, archaic whales possessed a well-developed, heterodont adult dentition. How these teeth were used, and what role their function and subsequ...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5582114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28855416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2017.0348 |
_version_ | 1783261129589391360 |
---|---|
author | Hocking, David P. Marx, Felix G. Fitzgerald, Erich M. G. Evans, Alistair R. |
author_facet | Hocking, David P. Marx, Felix G. Fitzgerald, Erich M. G. Evans, Alistair R. |
author_sort | Hocking, David P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The origin of baleen whales (Mysticeti), the largest animals on Earth, is closely tied to their signature filter-feeding strategy. Unlike their modern relatives, archaic whales possessed a well-developed, heterodont adult dentition. How these teeth were used, and what role their function and subsequent loss played in the emergence of filter feeding, is an enduring mystery. In particular, it has been suggested that elaborate tooth crowns may have enabled stem mysticetes to filter with their postcanine teeth in a manner analogous to living crabeater and leopard seals, thereby facilitating the transition to baleen-assisted filtering. Here we show that the teeth of archaic mysticetes are as sharp as those of terrestrial carnivorans, raptorial pinnipeds and archaeocetes, and thus were capable of capturing and processing prey. By contrast, the postcanine teeth of leopard and crabeater seals are markedly blunter, and clearly unsuited to raptorial feeding. Our results suggest that mysticetes never passed through a tooth-based filtration phase, and that the use of teeth and baleen in early whales was not functionally connected. Continued selection for tooth sharpness in archaic mysticetes is best explained by a feeding strategy that included both biting and suction, similar to that of most living pinnipeds and, probably, early toothed whales (Odontoceti). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5582114 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55821142017-09-06 Ancient whales did not filter feed with their teeth Hocking, David P. Marx, Felix G. Fitzgerald, Erich M. G. Evans, Alistair R. Biol Lett Palaeontology The origin of baleen whales (Mysticeti), the largest animals on Earth, is closely tied to their signature filter-feeding strategy. Unlike their modern relatives, archaic whales possessed a well-developed, heterodont adult dentition. How these teeth were used, and what role their function and subsequent loss played in the emergence of filter feeding, is an enduring mystery. In particular, it has been suggested that elaborate tooth crowns may have enabled stem mysticetes to filter with their postcanine teeth in a manner analogous to living crabeater and leopard seals, thereby facilitating the transition to baleen-assisted filtering. Here we show that the teeth of archaic mysticetes are as sharp as those of terrestrial carnivorans, raptorial pinnipeds and archaeocetes, and thus were capable of capturing and processing prey. By contrast, the postcanine teeth of leopard and crabeater seals are markedly blunter, and clearly unsuited to raptorial feeding. Our results suggest that mysticetes never passed through a tooth-based filtration phase, and that the use of teeth and baleen in early whales was not functionally connected. Continued selection for tooth sharpness in archaic mysticetes is best explained by a feeding strategy that included both biting and suction, similar to that of most living pinnipeds and, probably, early toothed whales (Odontoceti). The Royal Society 2017-08 2017-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5582114/ /pubmed/28855416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2017.0348 Text en © 2017 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Palaeontology Hocking, David P. Marx, Felix G. Fitzgerald, Erich M. G. Evans, Alistair R. Ancient whales did not filter feed with their teeth |
title | Ancient whales did not filter feed with their teeth |
title_full | Ancient whales did not filter feed with their teeth |
title_fullStr | Ancient whales did not filter feed with their teeth |
title_full_unstemmed | Ancient whales did not filter feed with their teeth |
title_short | Ancient whales did not filter feed with their teeth |
title_sort | ancient whales did not filter feed with their teeth |
topic | Palaeontology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5582114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28855416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2017.0348 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hockingdavidp ancientwhalesdidnotfilterfeedwiththeirteeth AT marxfelixg ancientwhalesdidnotfilterfeedwiththeirteeth AT fitzgeralderichmg ancientwhalesdidnotfilterfeedwiththeirteeth AT evansalistairr ancientwhalesdidnotfilterfeedwiththeirteeth |