Cargando…

A Hybrid EMD-Kurtosis Method for Estimating Fetal Heart Rate from Continuous Doppler Signals

Monitoring of fetal heart rate (FHR) is an important measure of fetal wellbeing during the months of pregnancy. Previous works on estimating FHR variability from Doppler ultrasound (DUS) signal mainly through autocorrelation analysis showed low accuracy when compared with heart rate variability (HRV...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Angari, Haitham M., Kimura, Yoshitaka, Hadjileontiadis, Leontios J., Khandoker, Ahsan H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5582307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28912727
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00641
_version_ 1783261163396530176
author Al-Angari, Haitham M.
Kimura, Yoshitaka
Hadjileontiadis, Leontios J.
Khandoker, Ahsan H.
author_facet Al-Angari, Haitham M.
Kimura, Yoshitaka
Hadjileontiadis, Leontios J.
Khandoker, Ahsan H.
author_sort Al-Angari, Haitham M.
collection PubMed
description Monitoring of fetal heart rate (FHR) is an important measure of fetal wellbeing during the months of pregnancy. Previous works on estimating FHR variability from Doppler ultrasound (DUS) signal mainly through autocorrelation analysis showed low accuracy when compared with heart rate variability (HRV) computed from fetal electrocardiography (fECG). In this work, we proposed a method based on empirical mode decomposition (EMD) and the kurtosis statistics to estimate FHR and its variability from DUS. Comparison between estimated beat-to-beat intervals using the proposed method and the autocorrelation function (AF) with respect to RR intervals computed from fECG as the ground truth was done on DUS signals from 44 pregnant mothers in the early (20 cases) and late (24 cases) gestational weeks. The new EMD-kurtosis method showed significant lower error in estimating the number of beats in the early group (EMD-kurtosis: 2.2% vs. AF: 8.5%, p < 0.01, root mean squared error) and the late group (EMD-kurtosis: 2.9% vs. AF: 6.2%). The EMD-kurtosis method was also found to be better in estimating mean beat-to-beat with an average difference of 1.6 ms from true mean RR compared to 19.3 ms by using the AF method. However, the EMD-kurtosis performed worse than AF in estimating SNDD and RMSSD. The proposed EMD-kurtosis method is more robust than AF in low signal-to-noise ratio cases and can be used in a hybrid system to estimate beat-to-beat intervals from DUS. Further analysis to reduce the estimated beat-to-beat variability from the EMD-kurtosis method is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5582307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55823072017-09-14 A Hybrid EMD-Kurtosis Method for Estimating Fetal Heart Rate from Continuous Doppler Signals Al-Angari, Haitham M. Kimura, Yoshitaka Hadjileontiadis, Leontios J. Khandoker, Ahsan H. Front Physiol Physiology Monitoring of fetal heart rate (FHR) is an important measure of fetal wellbeing during the months of pregnancy. Previous works on estimating FHR variability from Doppler ultrasound (DUS) signal mainly through autocorrelation analysis showed low accuracy when compared with heart rate variability (HRV) computed from fetal electrocardiography (fECG). In this work, we proposed a method based on empirical mode decomposition (EMD) and the kurtosis statistics to estimate FHR and its variability from DUS. Comparison between estimated beat-to-beat intervals using the proposed method and the autocorrelation function (AF) with respect to RR intervals computed from fECG as the ground truth was done on DUS signals from 44 pregnant mothers in the early (20 cases) and late (24 cases) gestational weeks. The new EMD-kurtosis method showed significant lower error in estimating the number of beats in the early group (EMD-kurtosis: 2.2% vs. AF: 8.5%, p < 0.01, root mean squared error) and the late group (EMD-kurtosis: 2.9% vs. AF: 6.2%). The EMD-kurtosis method was also found to be better in estimating mean beat-to-beat with an average difference of 1.6 ms from true mean RR compared to 19.3 ms by using the AF method. However, the EMD-kurtosis performed worse than AF in estimating SNDD and RMSSD. The proposed EMD-kurtosis method is more robust than AF in low signal-to-noise ratio cases and can be used in a hybrid system to estimate beat-to-beat intervals from DUS. Further analysis to reduce the estimated beat-to-beat variability from the EMD-kurtosis method is needed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5582307/ /pubmed/28912727 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00641 Text en Copyright © 2017 Al-Angari, Kimura, Hadjileontiadis and Khandoker. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Al-Angari, Haitham M.
Kimura, Yoshitaka
Hadjileontiadis, Leontios J.
Khandoker, Ahsan H.
A Hybrid EMD-Kurtosis Method for Estimating Fetal Heart Rate from Continuous Doppler Signals
title A Hybrid EMD-Kurtosis Method for Estimating Fetal Heart Rate from Continuous Doppler Signals
title_full A Hybrid EMD-Kurtosis Method for Estimating Fetal Heart Rate from Continuous Doppler Signals
title_fullStr A Hybrid EMD-Kurtosis Method for Estimating Fetal Heart Rate from Continuous Doppler Signals
title_full_unstemmed A Hybrid EMD-Kurtosis Method for Estimating Fetal Heart Rate from Continuous Doppler Signals
title_short A Hybrid EMD-Kurtosis Method for Estimating Fetal Heart Rate from Continuous Doppler Signals
title_sort hybrid emd-kurtosis method for estimating fetal heart rate from continuous doppler signals
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5582307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28912727
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00641
work_keys_str_mv AT alangarihaithamm ahybridemdkurtosismethodforestimatingfetalheartratefromcontinuousdopplersignals
AT kimurayoshitaka ahybridemdkurtosismethodforestimatingfetalheartratefromcontinuousdopplersignals
AT hadjileontiadisleontiosj ahybridemdkurtosismethodforestimatingfetalheartratefromcontinuousdopplersignals
AT khandokerahsanh ahybridemdkurtosismethodforestimatingfetalheartratefromcontinuousdopplersignals
AT alangarihaithamm hybridemdkurtosismethodforestimatingfetalheartratefromcontinuousdopplersignals
AT kimurayoshitaka hybridemdkurtosismethodforestimatingfetalheartratefromcontinuousdopplersignals
AT hadjileontiadisleontiosj hybridemdkurtosismethodforestimatingfetalheartratefromcontinuousdopplersignals
AT khandokerahsanh hybridemdkurtosismethodforestimatingfetalheartratefromcontinuousdopplersignals