Cargando…
Risk perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge of chikungunya among the public and health professionals: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Recently, attention to chikungunya has increased due to its spread into previously non-endemic areas. Since there is no available treatment or vaccine, most intervention strategies focus on mosquito bite prevention and mosquito control, which require community involvement to be successfu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5582396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28878549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41182-017-0061-x |
_version_ | 1783261182520459264 |
---|---|
author | Corrin, Tricia Waddell, Lisa Greig, Judy Young, Ian Hierlihy, Catherine Mascarenhas, Mariola |
author_facet | Corrin, Tricia Waddell, Lisa Greig, Judy Young, Ian Hierlihy, Catherine Mascarenhas, Mariola |
author_sort | Corrin, Tricia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recently, attention to chikungunya has increased due to its spread into previously non-endemic areas. Since there is no available treatment or vaccine, most intervention strategies focus on mosquito bite prevention and mosquito control, which require community involvement to be successful. Thus, our objective was to systematically review the global primary literature on the risk perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge of chikungunya among the public and health professionals to inform future research and improve our understanding on which intervention strategies are likely to be successful. METHODS: Potentially relevant articles were identified through a standardized systematic review (SR) process consisting of the following steps: comprehensive search strategy in seven databases (Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL, CAB, LILACS, Agricola, and Cochrane) and a grey literature search of public health organizations, relevance screening, risk of bias assessment, and data extraction. Two independent reviewers performed each step. Reporting of this SR follows PRISMA reporting guidelines. RESULTS: Thirty-seven relevant articles were identified. The majority of the articles were published since 2011 (83.8%) and reported on studies conducted in Asia (48.7%) and the Indian Ocean Islands (24.3%). The results were separated into four categories: general knowledge and perceptions on chikungunya; perceptions on the risk and severity of chikungunya; knowledge of chikungunya-harboring vectors and transmission; and knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes on mitigation practices. Overall, the systematic review found that risk perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge of chikungunya among the public and health professionals vary across populations and countries and knowledge is higher in areas that have experienced an outbreak. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that most of the affected populations in this study do not understand mosquito borne diseases or chikungunya and are therefore less likely to protect themselves from mosquito bites. While more research is required to improve the generalizability of this dataset, it appears that a lack of knowledge is an important barrier for motivating community level interventions and personal protection against mosquitoes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s41182-017-0061-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5582396 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55823962017-09-06 Risk perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge of chikungunya among the public and health professionals: a systematic review Corrin, Tricia Waddell, Lisa Greig, Judy Young, Ian Hierlihy, Catherine Mascarenhas, Mariola Trop Med Health Review BACKGROUND: Recently, attention to chikungunya has increased due to its spread into previously non-endemic areas. Since there is no available treatment or vaccine, most intervention strategies focus on mosquito bite prevention and mosquito control, which require community involvement to be successful. Thus, our objective was to systematically review the global primary literature on the risk perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge of chikungunya among the public and health professionals to inform future research and improve our understanding on which intervention strategies are likely to be successful. METHODS: Potentially relevant articles were identified through a standardized systematic review (SR) process consisting of the following steps: comprehensive search strategy in seven databases (Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL, CAB, LILACS, Agricola, and Cochrane) and a grey literature search of public health organizations, relevance screening, risk of bias assessment, and data extraction. Two independent reviewers performed each step. Reporting of this SR follows PRISMA reporting guidelines. RESULTS: Thirty-seven relevant articles were identified. The majority of the articles were published since 2011 (83.8%) and reported on studies conducted in Asia (48.7%) and the Indian Ocean Islands (24.3%). The results were separated into four categories: general knowledge and perceptions on chikungunya; perceptions on the risk and severity of chikungunya; knowledge of chikungunya-harboring vectors and transmission; and knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes on mitigation practices. Overall, the systematic review found that risk perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge of chikungunya among the public and health professionals vary across populations and countries and knowledge is higher in areas that have experienced an outbreak. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that most of the affected populations in this study do not understand mosquito borne diseases or chikungunya and are therefore less likely to protect themselves from mosquito bites. While more research is required to improve the generalizability of this dataset, it appears that a lack of knowledge is an important barrier for motivating community level interventions and personal protection against mosquitoes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s41182-017-0061-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5582396/ /pubmed/28878549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41182-017-0061-x Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Corrin, Tricia Waddell, Lisa Greig, Judy Young, Ian Hierlihy, Catherine Mascarenhas, Mariola Risk perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge of chikungunya among the public and health professionals: a systematic review |
title | Risk perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge of chikungunya among the public and health professionals: a systematic review |
title_full | Risk perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge of chikungunya among the public and health professionals: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Risk perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge of chikungunya among the public and health professionals: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge of chikungunya among the public and health professionals: a systematic review |
title_short | Risk perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge of chikungunya among the public and health professionals: a systematic review |
title_sort | risk perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge of chikungunya among the public and health professionals: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5582396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28878549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41182-017-0061-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT corrintricia riskperceptionsattitudesandknowledgeofchikungunyaamongthepublicandhealthprofessionalsasystematicreview AT waddelllisa riskperceptionsattitudesandknowledgeofchikungunyaamongthepublicandhealthprofessionalsasystematicreview AT greigjudy riskperceptionsattitudesandknowledgeofchikungunyaamongthepublicandhealthprofessionalsasystematicreview AT youngian riskperceptionsattitudesandknowledgeofchikungunyaamongthepublicandhealthprofessionalsasystematicreview AT hierlihycatherine riskperceptionsattitudesandknowledgeofchikungunyaamongthepublicandhealthprofessionalsasystematicreview AT mascarenhasmariola riskperceptionsattitudesandknowledgeofchikungunyaamongthepublicandhealthprofessionalsasystematicreview |