Cargando…

Impact of pulmonary rehabilitation on postoperative complications in patients with lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND: Given the extent of the surgical indications for pulmonary lobectomy in breathless patients, preoperative care and evaluation of pulmonary function are increasingly necessary. The aim of this study was to assess the contribution of preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for reducing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saito, Hajime, Hatakeyama, Kazutoshi, Konno, Hayato, Matsunaga, Toshiki, Shimada, Yoichi, Minamiya, Yoshihiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5582456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28696575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12466
_version_ 1783261192271167488
author Saito, Hajime
Hatakeyama, Kazutoshi
Konno, Hayato
Matsunaga, Toshiki
Shimada, Yoichi
Minamiya, Yoshihiro
author_facet Saito, Hajime
Hatakeyama, Kazutoshi
Konno, Hayato
Matsunaga, Toshiki
Shimada, Yoichi
Minamiya, Yoshihiro
author_sort Saito, Hajime
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Given the extent of the surgical indications for pulmonary lobectomy in breathless patients, preoperative care and evaluation of pulmonary function are increasingly necessary. The aim of this study was to assess the contribution of preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for reducing the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: The records of 116 patients with COPD, including 51 patients who received PR, were retrospectively analyzed. Pulmonary function testing, including slow vital capacity (VC) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV (1)), was obtained preoperatively, after PR, and at one and six months postoperatively. The recovery rate of postoperative pulmonary function was standardized for functional loss associated with the different resected lung volumes. Propensity score analysis generated matched pairs of 31 patients divided into PR and non‐PR groups. RESULTS: The PR period was 18.7 ± 12.7 days in COPD patients. Preoperative pulmonary function was significantly improved after PR (VC 5.3%, FEV (1) 5.5%; P < 0.05). The FEV (1) recovery rate one month after surgery was significantly better in the PR (101.6%; P < 0.001) than in the non‐PR group (93.9%). In logistic regression analysis, predicted postoperative FEV (1), predicted postoperative %FEV (1), and PR were independent factors related to postoperative pulmonary complications after pulmonary lobectomy (odds ratio 18.9, 16.1, and 13.9, respectively; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PR improved the recovery rate of pulmonary function after lobectomy in the early period, and may decrease postoperative pulmonary complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5582456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55824562017-09-06 Impact of pulmonary rehabilitation on postoperative complications in patients with lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Saito, Hajime Hatakeyama, Kazutoshi Konno, Hayato Matsunaga, Toshiki Shimada, Yoichi Minamiya, Yoshihiro Thorac Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: Given the extent of the surgical indications for pulmonary lobectomy in breathless patients, preoperative care and evaluation of pulmonary function are increasingly necessary. The aim of this study was to assess the contribution of preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for reducing the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: The records of 116 patients with COPD, including 51 patients who received PR, were retrospectively analyzed. Pulmonary function testing, including slow vital capacity (VC) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV (1)), was obtained preoperatively, after PR, and at one and six months postoperatively. The recovery rate of postoperative pulmonary function was standardized for functional loss associated with the different resected lung volumes. Propensity score analysis generated matched pairs of 31 patients divided into PR and non‐PR groups. RESULTS: The PR period was 18.7 ± 12.7 days in COPD patients. Preoperative pulmonary function was significantly improved after PR (VC 5.3%, FEV (1) 5.5%; P < 0.05). The FEV (1) recovery rate one month after surgery was significantly better in the PR (101.6%; P < 0.001) than in the non‐PR group (93.9%). In logistic regression analysis, predicted postoperative FEV (1), predicted postoperative %FEV (1), and PR were independent factors related to postoperative pulmonary complications after pulmonary lobectomy (odds ratio 18.9, 16.1, and 13.9, respectively; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PR improved the recovery rate of pulmonary function after lobectomy in the early period, and may decrease postoperative pulmonary complications. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2017-07-11 2017-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5582456/ /pubmed/28696575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12466 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Saito, Hajime
Hatakeyama, Kazutoshi
Konno, Hayato
Matsunaga, Toshiki
Shimada, Yoichi
Minamiya, Yoshihiro
Impact of pulmonary rehabilitation on postoperative complications in patients with lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
title Impact of pulmonary rehabilitation on postoperative complications in patients with lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
title_full Impact of pulmonary rehabilitation on postoperative complications in patients with lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
title_fullStr Impact of pulmonary rehabilitation on postoperative complications in patients with lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
title_full_unstemmed Impact of pulmonary rehabilitation on postoperative complications in patients with lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
title_short Impact of pulmonary rehabilitation on postoperative complications in patients with lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
title_sort impact of pulmonary rehabilitation on postoperative complications in patients with lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5582456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28696575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12466
work_keys_str_mv AT saitohajime impactofpulmonaryrehabilitationonpostoperativecomplicationsinpatientswithlungcancerandchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT hatakeyamakazutoshi impactofpulmonaryrehabilitationonpostoperativecomplicationsinpatientswithlungcancerandchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT konnohayato impactofpulmonaryrehabilitationonpostoperativecomplicationsinpatientswithlungcancerandchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT matsunagatoshiki impactofpulmonaryrehabilitationonpostoperativecomplicationsinpatientswithlungcancerandchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT shimadayoichi impactofpulmonaryrehabilitationonpostoperativecomplicationsinpatientswithlungcancerandchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT minamiyayoshihiro impactofpulmonaryrehabilitationonpostoperativecomplicationsinpatientswithlungcancerandchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease