Cargando…

Quality Improvement Initiatives Need Rigorous Evaluation: The Case of Pressure Ulcers

The Partnership for Patients (PfP) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) have reported a 23.5% decline in hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPU) over 4 years resulting in a cumulative cost savings of more than $10 billion and 49 000 averted deaths, claiming that this significan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Averill, Richard F., Hughes, John S., Fuller, Richard L., Goldfield, Norbert I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5582644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27582460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1062860616666672
_version_ 1783261217475788800
author Averill, Richard F.
Hughes, John S.
Fuller, Richard L.
Goldfield, Norbert I.
author_facet Averill, Richard F.
Hughes, John S.
Fuller, Richard L.
Goldfield, Norbert I.
author_sort Averill, Richard F.
collection PubMed
description The Partnership for Patients (PfP) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) have reported a 23.5% decline in hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPU) over 4 years resulting in a cumulative cost savings of more than $10 billion and 49 000 averted deaths, claiming that this significant decline may have been spurred in part by Medicare payment incentives associated with severe (stage 3 or 4) HAPUs. Hospitals with a high rate of severe HAPUs have a payment penalty imposed, creating a financial disincentive to report severe HAPUs, possibly contributing to the magnitude of the reported decline. Despite the financial disincentive to report, the number of severe HAPUs found in claims data over the corresponding 4-year period did not decline but instead remained unchanged. The results from claims data, combined with some flaws in estimating HAPUs, call into question the validity of the decline in HAPUs reported by PfP and AHRQ.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5582644
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55826442017-09-15 Quality Improvement Initiatives Need Rigorous Evaluation: The Case of Pressure Ulcers Averill, Richard F. Hughes, John S. Fuller, Richard L. Goldfield, Norbert I. Am J Med Qual Articles The Partnership for Patients (PfP) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) have reported a 23.5% decline in hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPU) over 4 years resulting in a cumulative cost savings of more than $10 billion and 49 000 averted deaths, claiming that this significant decline may have been spurred in part by Medicare payment incentives associated with severe (stage 3 or 4) HAPUs. Hospitals with a high rate of severe HAPUs have a payment penalty imposed, creating a financial disincentive to report severe HAPUs, possibly contributing to the magnitude of the reported decline. Despite the financial disincentive to report, the number of severe HAPUs found in claims data over the corresponding 4-year period did not decline but instead remained unchanged. The results from claims data, combined with some flaws in estimating HAPUs, call into question the validity of the decline in HAPUs reported by PfP and AHRQ. SAGE Publications 2016-08-30 2017-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5582644/ /pubmed/27582460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1062860616666672 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Articles
Averill, Richard F.
Hughes, John S.
Fuller, Richard L.
Goldfield, Norbert I.
Quality Improvement Initiatives Need Rigorous Evaluation: The Case of Pressure Ulcers
title Quality Improvement Initiatives Need Rigorous Evaluation: The Case of Pressure Ulcers
title_full Quality Improvement Initiatives Need Rigorous Evaluation: The Case of Pressure Ulcers
title_fullStr Quality Improvement Initiatives Need Rigorous Evaluation: The Case of Pressure Ulcers
title_full_unstemmed Quality Improvement Initiatives Need Rigorous Evaluation: The Case of Pressure Ulcers
title_short Quality Improvement Initiatives Need Rigorous Evaluation: The Case of Pressure Ulcers
title_sort quality improvement initiatives need rigorous evaluation: the case of pressure ulcers
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5582644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27582460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1062860616666672
work_keys_str_mv AT averillrichardf qualityimprovementinitiativesneedrigorousevaluationthecaseofpressureulcers
AT hughesjohns qualityimprovementinitiativesneedrigorousevaluationthecaseofpressureulcers
AT fullerrichardl qualityimprovementinitiativesneedrigorousevaluationthecaseofpressureulcers
AT goldfieldnorberti qualityimprovementinitiativesneedrigorousevaluationthecaseofpressureulcers