Cargando…
No Clinically Significant Difference Between Adult and Pediatric IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Scores in Adults
BACKGROUND: Two versions of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation form currently exist: the original version (1999) and a recently modified pediatric-specific version (2011). Comparison of the pediatric IKDC with the adult version in the adult population ma...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5582692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28080306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1941738116685299 |
_version_ | 1783261222806749184 |
---|---|
author | Stegmeier, Nicole Oak, Sameer R. O’Rourke, Colin Strnad, Greg Spindler, Kurt P. Jones, Morgan Farrow, Lutul D. Andrish, Jack Saluan, Paul |
author_facet | Stegmeier, Nicole Oak, Sameer R. O’Rourke, Colin Strnad, Greg Spindler, Kurt P. Jones, Morgan Farrow, Lutul D. Andrish, Jack Saluan, Paul |
author_sort | Stegmeier, Nicole |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Two versions of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation form currently exist: the original version (1999) and a recently modified pediatric-specific version (2011). Comparison of the pediatric IKDC with the adult version in the adult population may reveal that either version could be used longitudinally. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that the scores for the adult IKDC and pediatric IKDC will not be clinically different among adult patients aged 18 to 50 years. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized crossover study design. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2. METHODS: The study consisted of 100 participants, aged 18 to 50 years, who presented to orthopaedic outpatient clinics with knee problems. All participants completed both adult and pediatric versions of the IKDC in random order with a 10-minute break in between. We used a paired t test to test for a difference between the scores and a Welch’s 2-sample t test to test for equivalence. A least-squares regression model was used to model adult scores as a function of pediatric scores, and vice versa. RESULTS: A paired t test revealed a statistically significant 1.6-point difference between the mean adult and pediatric scores. However, the 95% confidence interval (0.54-2.66) for this difference did not exceed our a priori threshold of 5 points, indicating that this difference was not clinically important. Equivalence testing with an equivalence region of 5 points further supported this finding. The adult and pediatric scores had a linear relationship and were highly correlated with an R(2) of 92.6%. CONCLUSION: There is no clinically relevant difference between the scores of the adult and pediatric IKDC forms in adults, aged 18 to 50 years, with knee conditions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Either form, adult or pediatric, of the IKDC can be used in this population for longitudinal studies. If the pediatric version is administered in adolescence, it can be used for follow-up into adulthood. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5582692 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55826922018-01-12 No Clinically Significant Difference Between Adult and Pediatric IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Scores in Adults Stegmeier, Nicole Oak, Sameer R. O’Rourke, Colin Strnad, Greg Spindler, Kurt P. Jones, Morgan Farrow, Lutul D. Andrish, Jack Saluan, Paul Sports Health Current Research BACKGROUND: Two versions of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation form currently exist: the original version (1999) and a recently modified pediatric-specific version (2011). Comparison of the pediatric IKDC with the adult version in the adult population may reveal that either version could be used longitudinally. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that the scores for the adult IKDC and pediatric IKDC will not be clinically different among adult patients aged 18 to 50 years. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized crossover study design. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2. METHODS: The study consisted of 100 participants, aged 18 to 50 years, who presented to orthopaedic outpatient clinics with knee problems. All participants completed both adult and pediatric versions of the IKDC in random order with a 10-minute break in between. We used a paired t test to test for a difference between the scores and a Welch’s 2-sample t test to test for equivalence. A least-squares regression model was used to model adult scores as a function of pediatric scores, and vice versa. RESULTS: A paired t test revealed a statistically significant 1.6-point difference between the mean adult and pediatric scores. However, the 95% confidence interval (0.54-2.66) for this difference did not exceed our a priori threshold of 5 points, indicating that this difference was not clinically important. Equivalence testing with an equivalence region of 5 points further supported this finding. The adult and pediatric scores had a linear relationship and were highly correlated with an R(2) of 92.6%. CONCLUSION: There is no clinically relevant difference between the scores of the adult and pediatric IKDC forms in adults, aged 18 to 50 years, with knee conditions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Either form, adult or pediatric, of the IKDC can be used in this population for longitudinal studies. If the pediatric version is administered in adolescence, it can be used for follow-up into adulthood. SAGE Publications 2017-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5582692/ /pubmed/28080306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1941738116685299 Text en © 2017 The Author(s) |
spellingShingle | Current Research Stegmeier, Nicole Oak, Sameer R. O’Rourke, Colin Strnad, Greg Spindler, Kurt P. Jones, Morgan Farrow, Lutul D. Andrish, Jack Saluan, Paul No Clinically Significant Difference Between Adult and Pediatric IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Scores in Adults |
title | No Clinically Significant Difference Between Adult and Pediatric IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Scores in Adults |
title_full | No Clinically Significant Difference Between Adult and Pediatric IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Scores in Adults |
title_fullStr | No Clinically Significant Difference Between Adult and Pediatric IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Scores in Adults |
title_full_unstemmed | No Clinically Significant Difference Between Adult and Pediatric IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Scores in Adults |
title_short | No Clinically Significant Difference Between Adult and Pediatric IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Scores in Adults |
title_sort | no clinically significant difference between adult and pediatric ikdc subjective knee evaluation scores in adults |
topic | Current Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5582692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28080306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1941738116685299 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stegmeiernicole noclinicallysignificantdifferencebetweenadultandpediatricikdcsubjectivekneeevaluationscoresinadults AT oaksameerr noclinicallysignificantdifferencebetweenadultandpediatricikdcsubjectivekneeevaluationscoresinadults AT orourkecolin noclinicallysignificantdifferencebetweenadultandpediatricikdcsubjectivekneeevaluationscoresinadults AT strnadgreg noclinicallysignificantdifferencebetweenadultandpediatricikdcsubjectivekneeevaluationscoresinadults AT spindlerkurtp noclinicallysignificantdifferencebetweenadultandpediatricikdcsubjectivekneeevaluationscoresinadults AT jonesmorgan noclinicallysignificantdifferencebetweenadultandpediatricikdcsubjectivekneeevaluationscoresinadults AT farrowlutuld noclinicallysignificantdifferencebetweenadultandpediatricikdcsubjectivekneeevaluationscoresinadults AT andrishjack noclinicallysignificantdifferencebetweenadultandpediatricikdcsubjectivekneeevaluationscoresinadults AT saluanpaul noclinicallysignificantdifferencebetweenadultandpediatricikdcsubjectivekneeevaluationscoresinadults |