Cargando…

No Clinically Significant Difference Between Adult and Pediatric IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Scores in Adults

BACKGROUND: Two versions of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation form currently exist: the original version (1999) and a recently modified pediatric-specific version (2011). Comparison of the pediatric IKDC with the adult version in the adult population ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stegmeier, Nicole, Oak, Sameer R., O’Rourke, Colin, Strnad, Greg, Spindler, Kurt P., Jones, Morgan, Farrow, Lutul D., Andrish, Jack, Saluan, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5582692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28080306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1941738116685299
_version_ 1783261222806749184
author Stegmeier, Nicole
Oak, Sameer R.
O’Rourke, Colin
Strnad, Greg
Spindler, Kurt P.
Jones, Morgan
Farrow, Lutul D.
Andrish, Jack
Saluan, Paul
author_facet Stegmeier, Nicole
Oak, Sameer R.
O’Rourke, Colin
Strnad, Greg
Spindler, Kurt P.
Jones, Morgan
Farrow, Lutul D.
Andrish, Jack
Saluan, Paul
author_sort Stegmeier, Nicole
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Two versions of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation form currently exist: the original version (1999) and a recently modified pediatric-specific version (2011). Comparison of the pediatric IKDC with the adult version in the adult population may reveal that either version could be used longitudinally. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that the scores for the adult IKDC and pediatric IKDC will not be clinically different among adult patients aged 18 to 50 years. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized crossover study design. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2. METHODS: The study consisted of 100 participants, aged 18 to 50 years, who presented to orthopaedic outpatient clinics with knee problems. All participants completed both adult and pediatric versions of the IKDC in random order with a 10-minute break in between. We used a paired t test to test for a difference between the scores and a Welch’s 2-sample t test to test for equivalence. A least-squares regression model was used to model adult scores as a function of pediatric scores, and vice versa. RESULTS: A paired t test revealed a statistically significant 1.6-point difference between the mean adult and pediatric scores. However, the 95% confidence interval (0.54-2.66) for this difference did not exceed our a priori threshold of 5 points, indicating that this difference was not clinically important. Equivalence testing with an equivalence region of 5 points further supported this finding. The adult and pediatric scores had a linear relationship and were highly correlated with an R(2) of 92.6%. CONCLUSION: There is no clinically relevant difference between the scores of the adult and pediatric IKDC forms in adults, aged 18 to 50 years, with knee conditions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Either form, adult or pediatric, of the IKDC can be used in this population for longitudinal studies. If the pediatric version is administered in adolescence, it can be used for follow-up into adulthood.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5582692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55826922018-01-12 No Clinically Significant Difference Between Adult and Pediatric IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Scores in Adults Stegmeier, Nicole Oak, Sameer R. O’Rourke, Colin Strnad, Greg Spindler, Kurt P. Jones, Morgan Farrow, Lutul D. Andrish, Jack Saluan, Paul Sports Health Current Research BACKGROUND: Two versions of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation form currently exist: the original version (1999) and a recently modified pediatric-specific version (2011). Comparison of the pediatric IKDC with the adult version in the adult population may reveal that either version could be used longitudinally. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that the scores for the adult IKDC and pediatric IKDC will not be clinically different among adult patients aged 18 to 50 years. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized crossover study design. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2. METHODS: The study consisted of 100 participants, aged 18 to 50 years, who presented to orthopaedic outpatient clinics with knee problems. All participants completed both adult and pediatric versions of the IKDC in random order with a 10-minute break in between. We used a paired t test to test for a difference between the scores and a Welch’s 2-sample t test to test for equivalence. A least-squares regression model was used to model adult scores as a function of pediatric scores, and vice versa. RESULTS: A paired t test revealed a statistically significant 1.6-point difference between the mean adult and pediatric scores. However, the 95% confidence interval (0.54-2.66) for this difference did not exceed our a priori threshold of 5 points, indicating that this difference was not clinically important. Equivalence testing with an equivalence region of 5 points further supported this finding. The adult and pediatric scores had a linear relationship and were highly correlated with an R(2) of 92.6%. CONCLUSION: There is no clinically relevant difference between the scores of the adult and pediatric IKDC forms in adults, aged 18 to 50 years, with knee conditions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Either form, adult or pediatric, of the IKDC can be used in this population for longitudinal studies. If the pediatric version is administered in adolescence, it can be used for follow-up into adulthood. SAGE Publications 2017-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5582692/ /pubmed/28080306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1941738116685299 Text en © 2017 The Author(s)
spellingShingle Current Research
Stegmeier, Nicole
Oak, Sameer R.
O’Rourke, Colin
Strnad, Greg
Spindler, Kurt P.
Jones, Morgan
Farrow, Lutul D.
Andrish, Jack
Saluan, Paul
No Clinically Significant Difference Between Adult and Pediatric IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Scores in Adults
title No Clinically Significant Difference Between Adult and Pediatric IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Scores in Adults
title_full No Clinically Significant Difference Between Adult and Pediatric IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Scores in Adults
title_fullStr No Clinically Significant Difference Between Adult and Pediatric IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Scores in Adults
title_full_unstemmed No Clinically Significant Difference Between Adult and Pediatric IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Scores in Adults
title_short No Clinically Significant Difference Between Adult and Pediatric IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Scores in Adults
title_sort no clinically significant difference between adult and pediatric ikdc subjective knee evaluation scores in adults
topic Current Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5582692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28080306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1941738116685299
work_keys_str_mv AT stegmeiernicole noclinicallysignificantdifferencebetweenadultandpediatricikdcsubjectivekneeevaluationscoresinadults
AT oaksameerr noclinicallysignificantdifferencebetweenadultandpediatricikdcsubjectivekneeevaluationscoresinadults
AT orourkecolin noclinicallysignificantdifferencebetweenadultandpediatricikdcsubjectivekneeevaluationscoresinadults
AT strnadgreg noclinicallysignificantdifferencebetweenadultandpediatricikdcsubjectivekneeevaluationscoresinadults
AT spindlerkurtp noclinicallysignificantdifferencebetweenadultandpediatricikdcsubjectivekneeevaluationscoresinadults
AT jonesmorgan noclinicallysignificantdifferencebetweenadultandpediatricikdcsubjectivekneeevaluationscoresinadults
AT farrowlutuld noclinicallysignificantdifferencebetweenadultandpediatricikdcsubjectivekneeevaluationscoresinadults
AT andrishjack noclinicallysignificantdifferencebetweenadultandpediatricikdcsubjectivekneeevaluationscoresinadults
AT saluanpaul noclinicallysignificantdifferencebetweenadultandpediatricikdcsubjectivekneeevaluationscoresinadults