Artificial urinary sphincter

Although currently still the gold standard treatment for post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence, the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) (AMS800) is an invasive procedure with associated risks factors. In this paper, we aim to outline what the scientific literature and what we personally believe are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brant, William O., Martins, Francisco E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2017
Materias:
Review Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5583059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28904901
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.07.31
_version_ 1783261258219257856
author Brant, William O.
Martins, Francisco E.
author_facet Brant, William O.
Martins, Francisco E.
author_sort Brant, William O.
collection PubMed
description Although currently still the gold standard treatment for post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence, the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) (AMS800) is an invasive procedure with associated risks factors. In this paper, we aim to outline what the scientific literature and what we personally believe are the factors that are useful and/or necessary to mitigate these risks, including both patient factors and surgeon factors. We also review special populations, including transcorporal (TC) AUS approach, AUS with inflatable penile prosthesis, AUS after male urethral sling, AUS erosion management, and AUS after orthotopic urinary diversion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5583059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55830592017-09-13 Artificial urinary sphincter Brant, William O. Martins, Francisco E. Transl Androl Urol Review Article Although currently still the gold standard treatment for post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence, the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) (AMS800) is an invasive procedure with associated risks factors. In this paper, we aim to outline what the scientific literature and what we personally believe are the factors that are useful and/or necessary to mitigate these risks, including both patient factors and surgeon factors. We also review special populations, including transcorporal (TC) AUS approach, AUS with inflatable penile prosthesis, AUS after male urethral sling, AUS erosion management, and AUS after orthotopic urinary diversion. AME Publishing Company 2017-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5583059/ /pubmed/28904901 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.07.31 Text en 2017 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Review Article
Brant, William O.
Martins, Francisco E.
Artificial urinary sphincter
title Artificial urinary sphincter
title_full Artificial urinary sphincter
title_fullStr Artificial urinary sphincter
title_full_unstemmed Artificial urinary sphincter
title_short Artificial urinary sphincter
title_sort artificial urinary sphincter
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5583059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28904901
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.07.31
work_keys_str_mv AT brantwilliamo artificialurinarysphincter
AT martinsfranciscoe artificialurinarysphincter

Ejemplares similares