Cargando…

Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study

BACKGROUND: Various techniques are available for elevating the sinus membrane. The aim of this study is to evaluate three methods of indirect sinus floor elevation regarding elevation heights of 7 mm on the outcomes of membrane perforation, length of perforation, and time required to perform the pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yassin Alsabbagh, Aghiad, Alsabbagh, Mohammed Monzer, Darjazini Nahas, Batol, Rajih, Salam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5583135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28871524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-017-0103-5
_version_ 1783261260294389760
author Yassin Alsabbagh, Aghiad
Alsabbagh, Mohammed Monzer
Darjazini Nahas, Batol
Rajih, Salam
author_facet Yassin Alsabbagh, Aghiad
Alsabbagh, Mohammed Monzer
Darjazini Nahas, Batol
Rajih, Salam
author_sort Yassin Alsabbagh, Aghiad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Various techniques are available for elevating the sinus membrane. The aim of this study is to evaluate three methods of indirect sinus floor elevation regarding elevation heights of 7 mm on the outcomes of membrane perforation, length of perforation, and time required to perform the procedure. METHODS: Three different methods for indirect sinus lifting, bone added osteotome sinus floor elevation (BAOSFE), sinus floor elevation with an inflatable balloon, and crestal approach system (CAS kit) from OSSTEM, were assessed for their ability to lift the sinus without causing laceration of the Schneiderian membrane. The study was performed on 18 freshly slaughtered sheep heads (36 sinus lifts were done, 12 for each method). CBCT images of the heads were taken to assess the best location for the sinus lift. Then, the heads were bisected and the membrane was exposed from the medial aspect. After that, each method was performed. The intended elevation height was 7 mm. If the 7 mm were not reached, the maximum height of elevation was measured. RESULTS: The method used was significantly associated with the occurrence of perforation (p value = 0.014) where BAOSFE was associated with the largest number of perforations (58.4%, n = 7) compared to 8.3% and 8.3% for the balloon and CAS kit methods, respectively. The odds ratio for perforation occurrence from BAOSFE compared to the CAS kit was significant (OR = 0.091, p = .022). No significant odds ratio was found for the balloon method compared to CAS kit. Additionally, the method used was significantly associated with time of operation and with the length of perforation (p value < 0.001) where CAS kit required the longest time and BAOSFE caused the biggest perforations. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that both the balloon and the CAS kit were superior to the BAOSFE in terms of safety in elevating the sinus membrane. Further, in vivo studies have to prove these findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5583135
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55831352017-09-22 Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study Yassin Alsabbagh, Aghiad Alsabbagh, Mohammed Monzer Darjazini Nahas, Batol Rajih, Salam Int J Implant Dent Research BACKGROUND: Various techniques are available for elevating the sinus membrane. The aim of this study is to evaluate three methods of indirect sinus floor elevation regarding elevation heights of 7 mm on the outcomes of membrane perforation, length of perforation, and time required to perform the procedure. METHODS: Three different methods for indirect sinus lifting, bone added osteotome sinus floor elevation (BAOSFE), sinus floor elevation with an inflatable balloon, and crestal approach system (CAS kit) from OSSTEM, were assessed for their ability to lift the sinus without causing laceration of the Schneiderian membrane. The study was performed on 18 freshly slaughtered sheep heads (36 sinus lifts were done, 12 for each method). CBCT images of the heads were taken to assess the best location for the sinus lift. Then, the heads were bisected and the membrane was exposed from the medial aspect. After that, each method was performed. The intended elevation height was 7 mm. If the 7 mm were not reached, the maximum height of elevation was measured. RESULTS: The method used was significantly associated with the occurrence of perforation (p value = 0.014) where BAOSFE was associated with the largest number of perforations (58.4%, n = 7) compared to 8.3% and 8.3% for the balloon and CAS kit methods, respectively. The odds ratio for perforation occurrence from BAOSFE compared to the CAS kit was significant (OR = 0.091, p = .022). No significant odds ratio was found for the balloon method compared to CAS kit. Additionally, the method used was significantly associated with time of operation and with the length of perforation (p value < 0.001) where CAS kit required the longest time and BAOSFE caused the biggest perforations. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that both the balloon and the CAS kit were superior to the BAOSFE in terms of safety in elevating the sinus membrane. Further, in vivo studies have to prove these findings. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5583135/ /pubmed/28871524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-017-0103-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Yassin Alsabbagh, Aghiad
Alsabbagh, Mohammed Monzer
Darjazini Nahas, Batol
Rajih, Salam
Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study
title Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study
title_full Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study
title_fullStr Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study
title_short Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study
title_sort comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5583135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28871524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-017-0103-5
work_keys_str_mv AT yassinalsabbaghaghiad comparisonofthreedifferentmethodsofinternalsinusliftingforelevationheightsof7mmanexvivostudy
AT alsabbaghmohammedmonzer comparisonofthreedifferentmethodsofinternalsinusliftingforelevationheightsof7mmanexvivostudy
AT darjazininahasbatol comparisonofthreedifferentmethodsofinternalsinusliftingforelevationheightsof7mmanexvivostudy
AT rajihsalam comparisonofthreedifferentmethodsofinternalsinusliftingforelevationheightsof7mmanexvivostudy