Cargando…

Comparison of Glucose Area Under the Curve Measured Using Minimally Invasive Interstitial Fluid Extraction Technology with Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Diabetic Patients

BACKGROUND: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is reported to be a useful technique, but difficult or inconvenient for some patients and institutions. We are developing a glucose area under the curve (AUC) monitoring system without blood sampling using a minimally invasive interstitial fluid extrac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uemura, Mei, Yano, Yutaka, Suzuki, Toshinari, Yasuma, Taro, Sato, Toshiyuki, Morimoto, Aya, Hosoya, Samiko, Suminaka, Chihiro, Nakajima, Hiromu, Gabazza, Esteban C., Takei, Yoshiyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Diabetes Association 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5583404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28868824
http://dx.doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2017.41.4.265
_version_ 1783261317965021184
author Uemura, Mei
Yano, Yutaka
Suzuki, Toshinari
Yasuma, Taro
Sato, Toshiyuki
Morimoto, Aya
Hosoya, Samiko
Suminaka, Chihiro
Nakajima, Hiromu
Gabazza, Esteban C.
Takei, Yoshiyuki
author_facet Uemura, Mei
Yano, Yutaka
Suzuki, Toshinari
Yasuma, Taro
Sato, Toshiyuki
Morimoto, Aya
Hosoya, Samiko
Suminaka, Chihiro
Nakajima, Hiromu
Gabazza, Esteban C.
Takei, Yoshiyuki
author_sort Uemura, Mei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is reported to be a useful technique, but difficult or inconvenient for some patients and institutions. We are developing a glucose area under the curve (AUC) monitoring system without blood sampling using a minimally invasive interstitial fluid extraction technology (MIET). Here we evaluated the accuracy of interstitial fluid glucose (IG) AUC measured by MIET in patients with diabetes for an extended time interval and the potency of detecting hyperglycemia using CGM data as a reference. METHODS: Thirty-eight inpatients with diabetes undergoing CGM were enrolled. MIET comprised a pretreatment step using a plastic microneedle array and glucose accumulation step with a hydrogel patch, which was placed on two sites from 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM or from 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM. IG AUC was calculated by accumulated glucose extracted by hydrogel patches using sodium ion as standard. RESULTS: A significant correlation was observed between the predicted AUC by MIET and CGM in daytime (r=0.76) and nighttime (r=0.82). The optimal cutoff for the IG AUC value of MIET to predict hyperglycemia over 200 mg/dL measured by CGM for 8 hours was 1,067.3 mg·hr/dL with 88.2% sensitivity and 81.5% specificity. CONCLUSION: We showed that 8-hour IG AUC levels using MIET were valuable in estimating the blood glucose AUC without blood sampling. The results also supported the concept of using this technique for evaluating glucose excursion and for screening hyperglycemia during 8 hours in patients with diabetes at any time of day.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5583404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Korean Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55834042017-09-05 Comparison of Glucose Area Under the Curve Measured Using Minimally Invasive Interstitial Fluid Extraction Technology with Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Diabetic Patients Uemura, Mei Yano, Yutaka Suzuki, Toshinari Yasuma, Taro Sato, Toshiyuki Morimoto, Aya Hosoya, Samiko Suminaka, Chihiro Nakajima, Hiromu Gabazza, Esteban C. Takei, Yoshiyuki Diabetes Metab J Original Article BACKGROUND: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is reported to be a useful technique, but difficult or inconvenient for some patients and institutions. We are developing a glucose area under the curve (AUC) monitoring system without blood sampling using a minimally invasive interstitial fluid extraction technology (MIET). Here we evaluated the accuracy of interstitial fluid glucose (IG) AUC measured by MIET in patients with diabetes for an extended time interval and the potency of detecting hyperglycemia using CGM data as a reference. METHODS: Thirty-eight inpatients with diabetes undergoing CGM were enrolled. MIET comprised a pretreatment step using a plastic microneedle array and glucose accumulation step with a hydrogel patch, which was placed on two sites from 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM or from 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM. IG AUC was calculated by accumulated glucose extracted by hydrogel patches using sodium ion as standard. RESULTS: A significant correlation was observed between the predicted AUC by MIET and CGM in daytime (r=0.76) and nighttime (r=0.82). The optimal cutoff for the IG AUC value of MIET to predict hyperglycemia over 200 mg/dL measured by CGM for 8 hours was 1,067.3 mg·hr/dL with 88.2% sensitivity and 81.5% specificity. CONCLUSION: We showed that 8-hour IG AUC levels using MIET were valuable in estimating the blood glucose AUC without blood sampling. The results also supported the concept of using this technique for evaluating glucose excursion and for screening hyperglycemia during 8 hours in patients with diabetes at any time of day. Korean Diabetes Association 2017-08 2017-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5583404/ /pubmed/28868824 http://dx.doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2017.41.4.265 Text en Copyright © 2017 Korean Diabetes Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Uemura, Mei
Yano, Yutaka
Suzuki, Toshinari
Yasuma, Taro
Sato, Toshiyuki
Morimoto, Aya
Hosoya, Samiko
Suminaka, Chihiro
Nakajima, Hiromu
Gabazza, Esteban C.
Takei, Yoshiyuki
Comparison of Glucose Area Under the Curve Measured Using Minimally Invasive Interstitial Fluid Extraction Technology with Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Diabetic Patients
title Comparison of Glucose Area Under the Curve Measured Using Minimally Invasive Interstitial Fluid Extraction Technology with Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Diabetic Patients
title_full Comparison of Glucose Area Under the Curve Measured Using Minimally Invasive Interstitial Fluid Extraction Technology with Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Diabetic Patients
title_fullStr Comparison of Glucose Area Under the Curve Measured Using Minimally Invasive Interstitial Fluid Extraction Technology with Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Diabetic Patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Glucose Area Under the Curve Measured Using Minimally Invasive Interstitial Fluid Extraction Technology with Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Diabetic Patients
title_short Comparison of Glucose Area Under the Curve Measured Using Minimally Invasive Interstitial Fluid Extraction Technology with Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Diabetic Patients
title_sort comparison of glucose area under the curve measured using minimally invasive interstitial fluid extraction technology with continuous glucose monitoring system in diabetic patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5583404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28868824
http://dx.doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2017.41.4.265
work_keys_str_mv AT uemuramei comparisonofglucoseareaunderthecurvemeasuredusingminimallyinvasiveinterstitialfluidextractiontechnologywithcontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemindiabeticpatients
AT yanoyutaka comparisonofglucoseareaunderthecurvemeasuredusingminimallyinvasiveinterstitialfluidextractiontechnologywithcontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemindiabeticpatients
AT suzukitoshinari comparisonofglucoseareaunderthecurvemeasuredusingminimallyinvasiveinterstitialfluidextractiontechnologywithcontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemindiabeticpatients
AT yasumataro comparisonofglucoseareaunderthecurvemeasuredusingminimallyinvasiveinterstitialfluidextractiontechnologywithcontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemindiabeticpatients
AT satotoshiyuki comparisonofglucoseareaunderthecurvemeasuredusingminimallyinvasiveinterstitialfluidextractiontechnologywithcontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemindiabeticpatients
AT morimotoaya comparisonofglucoseareaunderthecurvemeasuredusingminimallyinvasiveinterstitialfluidextractiontechnologywithcontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemindiabeticpatients
AT hosoyasamiko comparisonofglucoseareaunderthecurvemeasuredusingminimallyinvasiveinterstitialfluidextractiontechnologywithcontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemindiabeticpatients
AT suminakachihiro comparisonofglucoseareaunderthecurvemeasuredusingminimallyinvasiveinterstitialfluidextractiontechnologywithcontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemindiabeticpatients
AT nakajimahiromu comparisonofglucoseareaunderthecurvemeasuredusingminimallyinvasiveinterstitialfluidextractiontechnologywithcontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemindiabeticpatients
AT gabazzaestebanc comparisonofglucoseareaunderthecurvemeasuredusingminimallyinvasiveinterstitialfluidextractiontechnologywithcontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemindiabeticpatients
AT takeiyoshiyuki comparisonofglucoseareaunderthecurvemeasuredusingminimallyinvasiveinterstitialfluidextractiontechnologywithcontinuousglucosemonitoringsystemindiabeticpatients