Cargando…

Estimating pressure gradients by auscultation: How technology (echocardiography) can help improve clinical skills

AIM: To extend our previously-published experience in estimating pressure gradients (PG) via physical examination in a large patient cohort. METHODS: From January 1, 1997 through December 31, 2009, an attending pediatric cardiologist compared clinical examination (EXAM) with Doppler-echo (ECHO), in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kadle, Rohini L, Phoon, Colin K L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5583542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28932358
http://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v9.i8.693
_version_ 1783261340886892544
author Kadle, Rohini L
Phoon, Colin K L
author_facet Kadle, Rohini L
Phoon, Colin K L
author_sort Kadle, Rohini L
collection PubMed
description AIM: To extend our previously-published experience in estimating pressure gradients (PG) via physical examination in a large patient cohort. METHODS: From January 1, 1997 through December 31, 2009, an attending pediatric cardiologist compared clinical examination (EXAM) with Doppler-echo (ECHO), in 1193 patients with pulmonic stenosis (PS, including tetralogy of Fallot), aortic stenosis (AS), and ventricular septal defect (VSD). EXAM PG estimates were based primarily on a murmur’s pitch, grade, and length. ECHO peak instantaneous PG was derived from the modified Bernoulli equation. Patients were 0-38.4 years old (median 4.8). RESULTS: For all patients, EXAM correlated highly with ECHO: ECHO = 0.99 (EXAM) + 3.2 mmHg; r = +0.89; P < 0.0001. Agreement was excellent (mean difference = -2.9 ± 16.1 mmHg). In 78% of all patients, agreement between EXAM and ECHO was within 15 mmHg and within 5 mmHg in 45%. Clinical estimates of PS PG were more accurate than of AS and VSD. A palpable precordial thrill and increasing loudness of the murmur predicted higher gradients (P < 0.0001). Weight did not influence accuracy. A learning curve was evident, such that the most recent quartile of patients showed ECHO = 1.01 (EXAM) + 1.9, r = +0.92, P < 0.0001; during this time, the attending pediatric cardiologist had been > 10 years in practice. CONCLUSION: Clinical examination can accurately estimate PG in PS, AS, or VSD. Continual correlation of clinical findings with echocardiography can lead to highly accurate diagnostic skills.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5583542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55835422017-09-20 Estimating pressure gradients by auscultation: How technology (echocardiography) can help improve clinical skills Kadle, Rohini L Phoon, Colin K L World J Cardiol Observational Study AIM: To extend our previously-published experience in estimating pressure gradients (PG) via physical examination in a large patient cohort. METHODS: From January 1, 1997 through December 31, 2009, an attending pediatric cardiologist compared clinical examination (EXAM) with Doppler-echo (ECHO), in 1193 patients with pulmonic stenosis (PS, including tetralogy of Fallot), aortic stenosis (AS), and ventricular septal defect (VSD). EXAM PG estimates were based primarily on a murmur’s pitch, grade, and length. ECHO peak instantaneous PG was derived from the modified Bernoulli equation. Patients were 0-38.4 years old (median 4.8). RESULTS: For all patients, EXAM correlated highly with ECHO: ECHO = 0.99 (EXAM) + 3.2 mmHg; r = +0.89; P < 0.0001. Agreement was excellent (mean difference = -2.9 ± 16.1 mmHg). In 78% of all patients, agreement between EXAM and ECHO was within 15 mmHg and within 5 mmHg in 45%. Clinical estimates of PS PG were more accurate than of AS and VSD. A palpable precordial thrill and increasing loudness of the murmur predicted higher gradients (P < 0.0001). Weight did not influence accuracy. A learning curve was evident, such that the most recent quartile of patients showed ECHO = 1.01 (EXAM) + 1.9, r = +0.92, P < 0.0001; during this time, the attending pediatric cardiologist had been > 10 years in practice. CONCLUSION: Clinical examination can accurately estimate PG in PS, AS, or VSD. Continual correlation of clinical findings with echocardiography can lead to highly accurate diagnostic skills. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017-08-26 2017-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5583542/ /pubmed/28932358 http://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v9.i8.693 Text en ©The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Observational Study
Kadle, Rohini L
Phoon, Colin K L
Estimating pressure gradients by auscultation: How technology (echocardiography) can help improve clinical skills
title Estimating pressure gradients by auscultation: How technology (echocardiography) can help improve clinical skills
title_full Estimating pressure gradients by auscultation: How technology (echocardiography) can help improve clinical skills
title_fullStr Estimating pressure gradients by auscultation: How technology (echocardiography) can help improve clinical skills
title_full_unstemmed Estimating pressure gradients by auscultation: How technology (echocardiography) can help improve clinical skills
title_short Estimating pressure gradients by auscultation: How technology (echocardiography) can help improve clinical skills
title_sort estimating pressure gradients by auscultation: how technology (echocardiography) can help improve clinical skills
topic Observational Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5583542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28932358
http://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v9.i8.693
work_keys_str_mv AT kadlerohinil estimatingpressuregradientsbyauscultationhowtechnologyechocardiographycanhelpimproveclinicalskills
AT phooncolinkl estimatingpressuregradientsbyauscultationhowtechnologyechocardiographycanhelpimproveclinicalskills