Cargando…

Characterizing gastrointestinal stromal tumors and evaluating neoadjuvant imatinib by sequencing of endoscopic ultrasound-biopsies

AIM: To evaluate endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biopsies for the pretreatment characterization of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) to personalize the management of patients. METHODS: All patients with lesions suspected to be GIST who were referred for EUS-sampling at a tertiary Swedish cen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hedenström, Per, Nilsson, Bengt, Demir, Akif, Andersson, Carola, Enlund, Fredrik, Nilsson, Ola, Sadik, Riadh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5583577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28932084
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i32.5925
_version_ 1783261343700221952
author Hedenström, Per
Nilsson, Bengt
Demir, Akif
Andersson, Carola
Enlund, Fredrik
Nilsson, Ola
Sadik, Riadh
author_facet Hedenström, Per
Nilsson, Bengt
Demir, Akif
Andersson, Carola
Enlund, Fredrik
Nilsson, Ola
Sadik, Riadh
author_sort Hedenström, Per
collection PubMed
description AIM: To evaluate endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biopsies for the pretreatment characterization of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) to personalize the management of patients. METHODS: All patients with lesions suspected to be GIST who were referred for EUS-sampling at a tertiary Swedish center were eligible for inclusion 2006-2015. During the observational study phase (2006-2011), routine fine-needle-aspiration (EUS-FNA) was performed. In 2012-2015, we converted to an interventional, randomized protocol with dual sampling EUS-FNA and fine-needle-biopsy-sampling (EUS-FNB) for all lesions. c-KIT- and DOG-1-immunostaining was attempted in all samples and a manual count of the Ki-67-index was performed. FNB-sampled tissue and the resected specimens were subjected to Sanger sequencing of the KIT and platelet-derived growth factor alpha (PDGFRA) genes. RESULTS: In all, 64 unique patients with GIST were included, and of these, 38 were subjected to pretreatment dual sampling. EUS-FNB had a higher diagnostic sensitivity when compared head-to-head with EUS-FNA (98% vs 58%, P < 0.001) and was more adequate for Ki-67-indexing (Ki-67(EUS)) (92% vs 40%, P < 0.001). Sequencing of EUS-biopsies was successful in 43/44 (98%) patients, and the mutation profiles (KIT-mutation 73%, PDGFRA-mutation 18%, wild-type 7%) were fully congruent with those detected in the corresponding resected specimens. In imatinib-naïve patients, the Ki-67(EUS) was comparable with the Ki-67-index in the corresponding surgical specimens (Ki-67(SURG)) (2.7% vs 2.9%, P = 0.68). In patients treated with neoadjuvant imatinib who also carried mutations indicating sensitivity, the Ki-67(EUS) was higher than the Ki-67(SURG) (2.5% vs 0.2%, P = 0.005), with a significant reduction in the Ki-67-index of -91.5% (95%CI: -82.4 to -96.0, P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: EUS-guided biopsy sampling is accurate for the pretreatment diagnosis and characterization of GISTs and allows the prediction and evaluation of tumor response to neoadjuvant imatinib therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5583577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55835772017-09-20 Characterizing gastrointestinal stromal tumors and evaluating neoadjuvant imatinib by sequencing of endoscopic ultrasound-biopsies Hedenström, Per Nilsson, Bengt Demir, Akif Andersson, Carola Enlund, Fredrik Nilsson, Ola Sadik, Riadh World J Gastroenterol Clinical Trials Study AIM: To evaluate endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biopsies for the pretreatment characterization of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) to personalize the management of patients. METHODS: All patients with lesions suspected to be GIST who were referred for EUS-sampling at a tertiary Swedish center were eligible for inclusion 2006-2015. During the observational study phase (2006-2011), routine fine-needle-aspiration (EUS-FNA) was performed. In 2012-2015, we converted to an interventional, randomized protocol with dual sampling EUS-FNA and fine-needle-biopsy-sampling (EUS-FNB) for all lesions. c-KIT- and DOG-1-immunostaining was attempted in all samples and a manual count of the Ki-67-index was performed. FNB-sampled tissue and the resected specimens were subjected to Sanger sequencing of the KIT and platelet-derived growth factor alpha (PDGFRA) genes. RESULTS: In all, 64 unique patients with GIST were included, and of these, 38 were subjected to pretreatment dual sampling. EUS-FNB had a higher diagnostic sensitivity when compared head-to-head with EUS-FNA (98% vs 58%, P < 0.001) and was more adequate for Ki-67-indexing (Ki-67(EUS)) (92% vs 40%, P < 0.001). Sequencing of EUS-biopsies was successful in 43/44 (98%) patients, and the mutation profiles (KIT-mutation 73%, PDGFRA-mutation 18%, wild-type 7%) were fully congruent with those detected in the corresponding resected specimens. In imatinib-naïve patients, the Ki-67(EUS) was comparable with the Ki-67-index in the corresponding surgical specimens (Ki-67(SURG)) (2.7% vs 2.9%, P = 0.68). In patients treated with neoadjuvant imatinib who also carried mutations indicating sensitivity, the Ki-67(EUS) was higher than the Ki-67(SURG) (2.5% vs 0.2%, P = 0.005), with a significant reduction in the Ki-67-index of -91.5% (95%CI: -82.4 to -96.0, P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: EUS-guided biopsy sampling is accurate for the pretreatment diagnosis and characterization of GISTs and allows the prediction and evaluation of tumor response to neoadjuvant imatinib therapy. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017-08-28 2017-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5583577/ /pubmed/28932084 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i32.5925 Text en ©The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Clinical Trials Study
Hedenström, Per
Nilsson, Bengt
Demir, Akif
Andersson, Carola
Enlund, Fredrik
Nilsson, Ola
Sadik, Riadh
Characterizing gastrointestinal stromal tumors and evaluating neoadjuvant imatinib by sequencing of endoscopic ultrasound-biopsies
title Characterizing gastrointestinal stromal tumors and evaluating neoadjuvant imatinib by sequencing of endoscopic ultrasound-biopsies
title_full Characterizing gastrointestinal stromal tumors and evaluating neoadjuvant imatinib by sequencing of endoscopic ultrasound-biopsies
title_fullStr Characterizing gastrointestinal stromal tumors and evaluating neoadjuvant imatinib by sequencing of endoscopic ultrasound-biopsies
title_full_unstemmed Characterizing gastrointestinal stromal tumors and evaluating neoadjuvant imatinib by sequencing of endoscopic ultrasound-biopsies
title_short Characterizing gastrointestinal stromal tumors and evaluating neoadjuvant imatinib by sequencing of endoscopic ultrasound-biopsies
title_sort characterizing gastrointestinal stromal tumors and evaluating neoadjuvant imatinib by sequencing of endoscopic ultrasound-biopsies
topic Clinical Trials Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5583577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28932084
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i32.5925
work_keys_str_mv AT hedenstromper characterizinggastrointestinalstromaltumorsandevaluatingneoadjuvantimatinibbysequencingofendoscopicultrasoundbiopsies
AT nilssonbengt characterizinggastrointestinalstromaltumorsandevaluatingneoadjuvantimatinibbysequencingofendoscopicultrasoundbiopsies
AT demirakif characterizinggastrointestinalstromaltumorsandevaluatingneoadjuvantimatinibbysequencingofendoscopicultrasoundbiopsies
AT anderssoncarola characterizinggastrointestinalstromaltumorsandevaluatingneoadjuvantimatinibbysequencingofendoscopicultrasoundbiopsies
AT enlundfredrik characterizinggastrointestinalstromaltumorsandevaluatingneoadjuvantimatinibbysequencingofendoscopicultrasoundbiopsies
AT nilssonola characterizinggastrointestinalstromaltumorsandevaluatingneoadjuvantimatinibbysequencingofendoscopicultrasoundbiopsies
AT sadikriadh characterizinggastrointestinalstromaltumorsandevaluatingneoadjuvantimatinibbysequencingofendoscopicultrasoundbiopsies