Cargando…
Vitrectomy with and without encircling band for pseudophakic retinal detachment: VIPER Study Report No 2—main results
BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether or not an additional encircling band improves outcome in vitrectomy for pseudophakic retinal detachment (PRD). Also unclear is whether small gauge transconjunctival trocar-guided vitrectomy is as successful as conventional 20 gauge (G) vitrectomy. METHODS: 257 adult...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5583681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27609785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309240 |
_version_ | 1783261362935300096 |
---|---|
author | Walter, Peter Hellmich, Martin Baumgarten, Sabine Schiller, Petra Limburg, Endrik Agostini, Hansjürgen Pielen, Amelie Helbig, Horst Lommatzsch, Albrecht Rössler, Gernot Mazinani, Babac |
author_facet | Walter, Peter Hellmich, Martin Baumgarten, Sabine Schiller, Petra Limburg, Endrik Agostini, Hansjürgen Pielen, Amelie Helbig, Horst Lommatzsch, Albrecht Rössler, Gernot Mazinani, Babac |
author_sort | Walter, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether or not an additional encircling band improves outcome in vitrectomy for pseudophakic retinal detachment (PRD). Also unclear is whether small gauge transconjunctival trocar-guided vitrectomy is as successful as conventional 20 gauge (G) vitrectomy. METHODS: 257 adult patients with uncomplicated PRD were enrolled in 14 vitreoretinal centres across Germany. Contingent on availability of qualified surgeons, eligible patients were randomly assigned either (i) with ratio 1:1 to 20 G vitrectomy plus encircling band (group E1) or 20 G vitrectomy without any buckle (group C) or (ii) with ratios 1:1:1 to group E1, C or 23/25 G vitrectomy without any buckle (group E2). Treatment success was defined as no indication for any retina reattaching procedure during the follow-up of 6 months. RESULTS: Success was reached in 79.0% (=79/100, group E1) versus 73.5% (=72/98, group C) (p=0.558, OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.65. In group E2 87.7% (=50/57) of patients reached success compared with 78.7% (=48/61) in group C, demonstrating non-inferiority of E2 to C regarding the prespecified margin of 0.8 (OR scale; p=0.05, OR 2.17, 95% CI 0.80 to 5.89). Best corrected visual acuity significantly increased after surgery independent of technique, that is, on average −0.7 (from 1.0 to 0.3) logMAR. Patients suffered from a shift in spherical refraction of −1.0 D in group E1 compared with −0.1 D in group C. Similarly, intraoperative complications (15.2% vs 8.8% of patients) and serious adverse events (30.3% vs 22.5% of patients) were more frequent in group E1. CONCLUSIONS: Vitrectomy with gas is an efficient and safe treatment for uncomplicated PRD. An additional encircling band does not significantly reduce the risk for any second procedure necessary to reattach the retina in 20 G vitrectomy. Small gauge transconjunctival vitrectomy is not inferior to the conventional 20 G technique. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DKRS 00003158, Results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5583681 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55836812017-09-08 Vitrectomy with and without encircling band for pseudophakic retinal detachment: VIPER Study Report No 2—main results Walter, Peter Hellmich, Martin Baumgarten, Sabine Schiller, Petra Limburg, Endrik Agostini, Hansjürgen Pielen, Amelie Helbig, Horst Lommatzsch, Albrecht Rössler, Gernot Mazinani, Babac Br J Ophthalmol Clinical Science BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether or not an additional encircling band improves outcome in vitrectomy for pseudophakic retinal detachment (PRD). Also unclear is whether small gauge transconjunctival trocar-guided vitrectomy is as successful as conventional 20 gauge (G) vitrectomy. METHODS: 257 adult patients with uncomplicated PRD were enrolled in 14 vitreoretinal centres across Germany. Contingent on availability of qualified surgeons, eligible patients were randomly assigned either (i) with ratio 1:1 to 20 G vitrectomy plus encircling band (group E1) or 20 G vitrectomy without any buckle (group C) or (ii) with ratios 1:1:1 to group E1, C or 23/25 G vitrectomy without any buckle (group E2). Treatment success was defined as no indication for any retina reattaching procedure during the follow-up of 6 months. RESULTS: Success was reached in 79.0% (=79/100, group E1) versus 73.5% (=72/98, group C) (p=0.558, OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.65. In group E2 87.7% (=50/57) of patients reached success compared with 78.7% (=48/61) in group C, demonstrating non-inferiority of E2 to C regarding the prespecified margin of 0.8 (OR scale; p=0.05, OR 2.17, 95% CI 0.80 to 5.89). Best corrected visual acuity significantly increased after surgery independent of technique, that is, on average −0.7 (from 1.0 to 0.3) logMAR. Patients suffered from a shift in spherical refraction of −1.0 D in group E1 compared with −0.1 D in group C. Similarly, intraoperative complications (15.2% vs 8.8% of patients) and serious adverse events (30.3% vs 22.5% of patients) were more frequent in group E1. CONCLUSIONS: Vitrectomy with gas is an efficient and safe treatment for uncomplicated PRD. An additional encircling band does not significantly reduce the risk for any second procedure necessary to reattach the retina in 20 G vitrectomy. Small gauge transconjunctival vitrectomy is not inferior to the conventional 20 G technique. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DKRS 00003158, Results. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-06 2016-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5583681/ /pubmed/27609785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309240 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Clinical Science Walter, Peter Hellmich, Martin Baumgarten, Sabine Schiller, Petra Limburg, Endrik Agostini, Hansjürgen Pielen, Amelie Helbig, Horst Lommatzsch, Albrecht Rössler, Gernot Mazinani, Babac Vitrectomy with and without encircling band for pseudophakic retinal detachment: VIPER Study Report No 2—main results |
title | Vitrectomy with and without encircling band for pseudophakic retinal detachment: VIPER Study Report No 2—main results |
title_full | Vitrectomy with and without encircling band for pseudophakic retinal detachment: VIPER Study Report No 2—main results |
title_fullStr | Vitrectomy with and without encircling band for pseudophakic retinal detachment: VIPER Study Report No 2—main results |
title_full_unstemmed | Vitrectomy with and without encircling band for pseudophakic retinal detachment: VIPER Study Report No 2—main results |
title_short | Vitrectomy with and without encircling band for pseudophakic retinal detachment: VIPER Study Report No 2—main results |
title_sort | vitrectomy with and without encircling band for pseudophakic retinal detachment: viper study report no 2—main results |
topic | Clinical Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5583681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27609785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309240 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walterpeter vitrectomywithandwithoutencirclingbandforpseudophakicretinaldetachmentviperstudyreportno2mainresults AT hellmichmartin vitrectomywithandwithoutencirclingbandforpseudophakicretinaldetachmentviperstudyreportno2mainresults AT baumgartensabine vitrectomywithandwithoutencirclingbandforpseudophakicretinaldetachmentviperstudyreportno2mainresults AT schillerpetra vitrectomywithandwithoutencirclingbandforpseudophakicretinaldetachmentviperstudyreportno2mainresults AT limburgendrik vitrectomywithandwithoutencirclingbandforpseudophakicretinaldetachmentviperstudyreportno2mainresults AT agostinihansjurgen vitrectomywithandwithoutencirclingbandforpseudophakicretinaldetachmentviperstudyreportno2mainresults AT pielenamelie vitrectomywithandwithoutencirclingbandforpseudophakicretinaldetachmentviperstudyreportno2mainresults AT helbighorst vitrectomywithandwithoutencirclingbandforpseudophakicretinaldetachmentviperstudyreportno2mainresults AT lommatzschalbrecht vitrectomywithandwithoutencirclingbandforpseudophakicretinaldetachmentviperstudyreportno2mainresults AT rosslergernot vitrectomywithandwithoutencirclingbandforpseudophakicretinaldetachmentviperstudyreportno2mainresults AT mazinanibabac vitrectomywithandwithoutencirclingbandforpseudophakicretinaldetachmentviperstudyreportno2mainresults |