Cargando…
The quality of systematic reviews about interventions for refractive error can be improved: a review of systematic reviews
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews should inform American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) Preferred Practice Pattern® (PPP) guidelines. The quality of systematic reviews related to the forthcoming Preferred Practice Pattern® guideline (PPP) Refractive Errors & Refractive Surgery is unknown. We sought...
Autores principales: | Mayo-Wilson, Evan, Ng, Sueko Matsumura, Chuck, Roy S., Li, Tianjing |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5584039/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28870179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0561-9 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Development of a checklist to detect errors in meta-analyses in systematic reviews of interventions: study protocol
por: Kanukula, Raju, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Conducting separate reviews of benefits and harms could improve systematic reviews and meta-analyses
por: Mayo-Wilson, Evan, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Prevalence of refractive errors, uncorrected refractive error, and presbyopia in adults in India: A systematic review
por: Sheeladevi, Sethu, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Summaries of harms in systematic reviews are unreliable Paper 1: An introduction to research on harms
por: Qureshi, Riaz, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Refractive Errors and Concomitant Strabismus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
por: Tang, Shu Min, et al.
Publicado: (2016)