Cargando…

Comparison of diagnostic accuracy in sepsis between presepsin, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The soluble cluster of differentiation 14 (or presepsin) is a free fragment of glycoprotein expressed on monocytes and macrophages. Although many studies have been conducted recently, the diagnostic performance of presepsin for sepsis remains debated. We performed a systematic review and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Chin-Chieh, Lan, Hao-Min, Han, Shih-Tsung, Chaou, Chung-Hsien, Yeh, Chun-Fu, Liu, Su-Hsun, Li, Chih-Huang, Blaney, Gerald N., Liu, Zhen-Ying, Chen, Kuan-Fu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5585118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28875483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-017-0316-z
_version_ 1783261551794323456
author Wu, Chin-Chieh
Lan, Hao-Min
Han, Shih-Tsung
Chaou, Chung-Hsien
Yeh, Chun-Fu
Liu, Su-Hsun
Li, Chih-Huang
Blaney, Gerald N.
Liu, Zhen-Ying
Chen, Kuan-Fu
author_facet Wu, Chin-Chieh
Lan, Hao-Min
Han, Shih-Tsung
Chaou, Chung-Hsien
Yeh, Chun-Fu
Liu, Su-Hsun
Li, Chih-Huang
Blaney, Gerald N.
Liu, Zhen-Ying
Chen, Kuan-Fu
author_sort Wu, Chin-Chieh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The soluble cluster of differentiation 14 (or presepsin) is a free fragment of glycoprotein expressed on monocytes and macrophages. Although many studies have been conducted recently, the diagnostic performance of presepsin for sepsis remains debated. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature to assess the accuracy of presepsin for the diagnosis of sepsis in adult patients and compared the performance between presepsin, C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin (PCT). METHODS: A comprehensive systemic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar for studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of presepsin for sepsis until January 2017. The hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic method was used to pool individual sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: Eighteen studies, comprising 3470 patients, met our inclusion criteria. The pooled diagnosis sensitivity and specificity of presepsin for sepsis were 0.84 (95% CI 0.80–0.87) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.67–0.82), respectively. Furthermore, the pooled DOR, PLR, NLR, and AUC were 16 (95% CI 10–25), 3.4 (95% CI 2.5–4.6), 0.22 (95% CI 0.17–0.27), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.85–0.90), respectively. Significant heterogeneity was found in both sensitivities (Cochrane Q = 137.43, p < 0.001, I (2) = 87.63%) and specificities (Cochrane Q = 180.76, p < 0.001, I (2) = 90.60%). Additionally, we found no significant difference between presepsin and PCT (AUC 0.87 vs. 0.86) or CRP (AUC 0.85 vs. 0.85). However, for studies conducted in ICU, the pooled sensitivity of presepsin was found to be higher than PCT (0.88, 95% CI 0.82–0.92 vs. 0.75, 95% CI 0.68–0.81), while the pooled specificity of presepsin was lower than PCT (0.58, 95% CI 0.42–0.73 vs. 0.75, 95% CI 0.65–0.83). CONCLUSION: Based on the results of our meta-analysis, presepsin is a promising marker for diagnosis of sepsis as PCT or CRP, but its results should be interpreted more carefully and cautiously since too few studies were included and those studies had high heterogeneity between them. In addition, continuing re-evaluation during the course of sepsis is advisable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5585118
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55851182017-09-22 Comparison of diagnostic accuracy in sepsis between presepsin, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein: a systematic review and meta-analysis Wu, Chin-Chieh Lan, Hao-Min Han, Shih-Tsung Chaou, Chung-Hsien Yeh, Chun-Fu Liu, Su-Hsun Li, Chih-Huang Blaney, Gerald N. Liu, Zhen-Ying Chen, Kuan-Fu Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: The soluble cluster of differentiation 14 (or presepsin) is a free fragment of glycoprotein expressed on monocytes and macrophages. Although many studies have been conducted recently, the diagnostic performance of presepsin for sepsis remains debated. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature to assess the accuracy of presepsin for the diagnosis of sepsis in adult patients and compared the performance between presepsin, C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin (PCT). METHODS: A comprehensive systemic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar for studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of presepsin for sepsis until January 2017. The hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic method was used to pool individual sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: Eighteen studies, comprising 3470 patients, met our inclusion criteria. The pooled diagnosis sensitivity and specificity of presepsin for sepsis were 0.84 (95% CI 0.80–0.87) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.67–0.82), respectively. Furthermore, the pooled DOR, PLR, NLR, and AUC were 16 (95% CI 10–25), 3.4 (95% CI 2.5–4.6), 0.22 (95% CI 0.17–0.27), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.85–0.90), respectively. Significant heterogeneity was found in both sensitivities (Cochrane Q = 137.43, p < 0.001, I (2) = 87.63%) and specificities (Cochrane Q = 180.76, p < 0.001, I (2) = 90.60%). Additionally, we found no significant difference between presepsin and PCT (AUC 0.87 vs. 0.86) or CRP (AUC 0.85 vs. 0.85). However, for studies conducted in ICU, the pooled sensitivity of presepsin was found to be higher than PCT (0.88, 95% CI 0.82–0.92 vs. 0.75, 95% CI 0.68–0.81), while the pooled specificity of presepsin was lower than PCT (0.58, 95% CI 0.42–0.73 vs. 0.75, 95% CI 0.65–0.83). CONCLUSION: Based on the results of our meta-analysis, presepsin is a promising marker for diagnosis of sepsis as PCT or CRP, but its results should be interpreted more carefully and cautiously since too few studies were included and those studies had high heterogeneity between them. In addition, continuing re-evaluation during the course of sepsis is advisable. Springer International Publishing 2017-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5585118/ /pubmed/28875483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-017-0316-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Wu, Chin-Chieh
Lan, Hao-Min
Han, Shih-Tsung
Chaou, Chung-Hsien
Yeh, Chun-Fu
Liu, Su-Hsun
Li, Chih-Huang
Blaney, Gerald N.
Liu, Zhen-Ying
Chen, Kuan-Fu
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy in sepsis between presepsin, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Comparison of diagnostic accuracy in sepsis between presepsin, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Comparison of diagnostic accuracy in sepsis between presepsin, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of diagnostic accuracy in sepsis between presepsin, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of diagnostic accuracy in sepsis between presepsin, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Comparison of diagnostic accuracy in sepsis between presepsin, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of diagnostic accuracy in sepsis between presepsin, procalcitonin, and c-reactive protein: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5585118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28875483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-017-0316-z
work_keys_str_mv AT wuchinchieh comparisonofdiagnosticaccuracyinsepsisbetweenpresepsinprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lanhaomin comparisonofdiagnosticaccuracyinsepsisbetweenpresepsinprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hanshihtsung comparisonofdiagnosticaccuracyinsepsisbetweenpresepsinprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chaouchunghsien comparisonofdiagnosticaccuracyinsepsisbetweenpresepsinprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yehchunfu comparisonofdiagnosticaccuracyinsepsisbetweenpresepsinprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liusuhsun comparisonofdiagnosticaccuracyinsepsisbetweenpresepsinprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lichihhuang comparisonofdiagnosticaccuracyinsepsisbetweenpresepsinprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT blaneygeraldn comparisonofdiagnosticaccuracyinsepsisbetweenpresepsinprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuzhenying comparisonofdiagnosticaccuracyinsepsisbetweenpresepsinprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenkuanfu comparisonofdiagnosticaccuracyinsepsisbetweenpresepsinprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis