Cargando…
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy in sepsis between presepsin, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The soluble cluster of differentiation 14 (or presepsin) is a free fragment of glycoprotein expressed on monocytes and macrophages. Although many studies have been conducted recently, the diagnostic performance of presepsin for sepsis remains debated. We performed a systematic review and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5585118/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28875483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-017-0316-z |
_version_ | 1783261551794323456 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Chin-Chieh Lan, Hao-Min Han, Shih-Tsung Chaou, Chung-Hsien Yeh, Chun-Fu Liu, Su-Hsun Li, Chih-Huang Blaney, Gerald N. Liu, Zhen-Ying Chen, Kuan-Fu |
author_facet | Wu, Chin-Chieh Lan, Hao-Min Han, Shih-Tsung Chaou, Chung-Hsien Yeh, Chun-Fu Liu, Su-Hsun Li, Chih-Huang Blaney, Gerald N. Liu, Zhen-Ying Chen, Kuan-Fu |
author_sort | Wu, Chin-Chieh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The soluble cluster of differentiation 14 (or presepsin) is a free fragment of glycoprotein expressed on monocytes and macrophages. Although many studies have been conducted recently, the diagnostic performance of presepsin for sepsis remains debated. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature to assess the accuracy of presepsin for the diagnosis of sepsis in adult patients and compared the performance between presepsin, C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin (PCT). METHODS: A comprehensive systemic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar for studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of presepsin for sepsis until January 2017. The hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic method was used to pool individual sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: Eighteen studies, comprising 3470 patients, met our inclusion criteria. The pooled diagnosis sensitivity and specificity of presepsin for sepsis were 0.84 (95% CI 0.80–0.87) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.67–0.82), respectively. Furthermore, the pooled DOR, PLR, NLR, and AUC were 16 (95% CI 10–25), 3.4 (95% CI 2.5–4.6), 0.22 (95% CI 0.17–0.27), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.85–0.90), respectively. Significant heterogeneity was found in both sensitivities (Cochrane Q = 137.43, p < 0.001, I (2) = 87.63%) and specificities (Cochrane Q = 180.76, p < 0.001, I (2) = 90.60%). Additionally, we found no significant difference between presepsin and PCT (AUC 0.87 vs. 0.86) or CRP (AUC 0.85 vs. 0.85). However, for studies conducted in ICU, the pooled sensitivity of presepsin was found to be higher than PCT (0.88, 95% CI 0.82–0.92 vs. 0.75, 95% CI 0.68–0.81), while the pooled specificity of presepsin was lower than PCT (0.58, 95% CI 0.42–0.73 vs. 0.75, 95% CI 0.65–0.83). CONCLUSION: Based on the results of our meta-analysis, presepsin is a promising marker for diagnosis of sepsis as PCT or CRP, but its results should be interpreted more carefully and cautiously since too few studies were included and those studies had high heterogeneity between them. In addition, continuing re-evaluation during the course of sepsis is advisable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5585118 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55851182017-09-22 Comparison of diagnostic accuracy in sepsis between presepsin, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein: a systematic review and meta-analysis Wu, Chin-Chieh Lan, Hao-Min Han, Shih-Tsung Chaou, Chung-Hsien Yeh, Chun-Fu Liu, Su-Hsun Li, Chih-Huang Blaney, Gerald N. Liu, Zhen-Ying Chen, Kuan-Fu Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: The soluble cluster of differentiation 14 (or presepsin) is a free fragment of glycoprotein expressed on monocytes and macrophages. Although many studies have been conducted recently, the diagnostic performance of presepsin for sepsis remains debated. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature to assess the accuracy of presepsin for the diagnosis of sepsis in adult patients and compared the performance between presepsin, C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin (PCT). METHODS: A comprehensive systemic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar for studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of presepsin for sepsis until January 2017. The hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic method was used to pool individual sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: Eighteen studies, comprising 3470 patients, met our inclusion criteria. The pooled diagnosis sensitivity and specificity of presepsin for sepsis were 0.84 (95% CI 0.80–0.87) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.67–0.82), respectively. Furthermore, the pooled DOR, PLR, NLR, and AUC were 16 (95% CI 10–25), 3.4 (95% CI 2.5–4.6), 0.22 (95% CI 0.17–0.27), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.85–0.90), respectively. Significant heterogeneity was found in both sensitivities (Cochrane Q = 137.43, p < 0.001, I (2) = 87.63%) and specificities (Cochrane Q = 180.76, p < 0.001, I (2) = 90.60%). Additionally, we found no significant difference between presepsin and PCT (AUC 0.87 vs. 0.86) or CRP (AUC 0.85 vs. 0.85). However, for studies conducted in ICU, the pooled sensitivity of presepsin was found to be higher than PCT (0.88, 95% CI 0.82–0.92 vs. 0.75, 95% CI 0.68–0.81), while the pooled specificity of presepsin was lower than PCT (0.58, 95% CI 0.42–0.73 vs. 0.75, 95% CI 0.65–0.83). CONCLUSION: Based on the results of our meta-analysis, presepsin is a promising marker for diagnosis of sepsis as PCT or CRP, but its results should be interpreted more carefully and cautiously since too few studies were included and those studies had high heterogeneity between them. In addition, continuing re-evaluation during the course of sepsis is advisable. Springer International Publishing 2017-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5585118/ /pubmed/28875483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-017-0316-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Wu, Chin-Chieh Lan, Hao-Min Han, Shih-Tsung Chaou, Chung-Hsien Yeh, Chun-Fu Liu, Su-Hsun Li, Chih-Huang Blaney, Gerald N. Liu, Zhen-Ying Chen, Kuan-Fu Comparison of diagnostic accuracy in sepsis between presepsin, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Comparison of diagnostic accuracy in sepsis between presepsin, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparison of diagnostic accuracy in sepsis between presepsin, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of diagnostic accuracy in sepsis between presepsin, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of diagnostic accuracy in sepsis between presepsin, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparison of diagnostic accuracy in sepsis between presepsin, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparison of diagnostic accuracy in sepsis between presepsin, procalcitonin, and c-reactive protein: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5585118/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28875483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-017-0316-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wuchinchieh comparisonofdiagnosticaccuracyinsepsisbetweenpresepsinprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lanhaomin comparisonofdiagnosticaccuracyinsepsisbetweenpresepsinprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hanshihtsung comparisonofdiagnosticaccuracyinsepsisbetweenpresepsinprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chaouchunghsien comparisonofdiagnosticaccuracyinsepsisbetweenpresepsinprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yehchunfu comparisonofdiagnosticaccuracyinsepsisbetweenpresepsinprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liusuhsun comparisonofdiagnosticaccuracyinsepsisbetweenpresepsinprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lichihhuang comparisonofdiagnosticaccuracyinsepsisbetweenpresepsinprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT blaneygeraldn comparisonofdiagnosticaccuracyinsepsisbetweenpresepsinprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuzhenying comparisonofdiagnosticaccuracyinsepsisbetweenpresepsinprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenkuanfu comparisonofdiagnosticaccuracyinsepsisbetweenpresepsinprocalcitoninandcreactiveproteinasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |