Cargando…

A comparison of blood pressure in community pharmacies with ambulatory, home and general practitioner office readings: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Blood pressure (BP) readings are traditionally taken in a clinic setting, with treatment recommendations based on these measurements. The clinical interpretation of BP readings taken in community pharmacies is currently unclear. This study aimed to systematically review all literature co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Albasri, Ali, O'Sullivan, Jack W., Roberts, Nia W., Prinjha, Suman, McManus, Richard J., Sheppard, James P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5585128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28594707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000001443
_version_ 1783261554186125312
author Albasri, Ali
O'Sullivan, Jack W.
Roberts, Nia W.
Prinjha, Suman
McManus, Richard J.
Sheppard, James P.
author_facet Albasri, Ali
O'Sullivan, Jack W.
Roberts, Nia W.
Prinjha, Suman
McManus, Richard J.
Sheppard, James P.
author_sort Albasri, Ali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Blood pressure (BP) readings are traditionally taken in a clinic setting, with treatment recommendations based on these measurements. The clinical interpretation of BP readings taken in community pharmacies is currently unclear. This study aimed to systematically review all literature comparing community pharmacy BP (CPBP) readings with ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), home BP monitoring and general practitioner clinic readings. METHOD: Studies were included if they compared CPBP with at least one other measurement modality used for the diagnosis or management of hypertension. Mean CPBP readings were compared with other measurement modalities and summarized using random-effects meta-analyses. The primary outcome was to compare CPBP with gold standard ABPM readings. RESULTS: Searches generated 3815 studies of which eight were included in the meta-analyses. The mean systolic CPBP-daytime ABPM difference was small [+1.6 mmHg (95% confidence interval −1.2 to 4.3) three studies, n = 319]. CPBP was significantly higher than 24-h ABPM [+7.8 mmHg (95% confidence interval 1.5–14.1) three studies n = 429]. Comparisons with general practitioner clinic readings (six studies, n = 2100) were inconclusive with significant heterogeneity between studies. CPBP and home BP monitoring readings (five studies, n = 1848) were nonsignificantly different. Diastolic comparisons mirrored systolic comparisons in all but the CPBP-daytime ABPM comparison, where CPBP was significantly higher. CONCLUSION: Current evidence around the clinical interpretation of CPBP is inconclusive. Although this review suggests that adopting the 135/85 mmHg threshold for hypertension might be reasonable and potentially result in a higher sensitivity for detecting patients with truly raised BP in pharmacies, the impact of this lower threshold on increased referrals to general practice clinics must be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5585128
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55851282017-09-18 A comparison of blood pressure in community pharmacies with ambulatory, home and general practitioner office readings: systematic review and meta-analysis Albasri, Ali O'Sullivan, Jack W. Roberts, Nia W. Prinjha, Suman McManus, Richard J. Sheppard, James P. J Hypertens Reviews BACKGROUND: Blood pressure (BP) readings are traditionally taken in a clinic setting, with treatment recommendations based on these measurements. The clinical interpretation of BP readings taken in community pharmacies is currently unclear. This study aimed to systematically review all literature comparing community pharmacy BP (CPBP) readings with ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), home BP monitoring and general practitioner clinic readings. METHOD: Studies were included if they compared CPBP with at least one other measurement modality used for the diagnosis or management of hypertension. Mean CPBP readings were compared with other measurement modalities and summarized using random-effects meta-analyses. The primary outcome was to compare CPBP with gold standard ABPM readings. RESULTS: Searches generated 3815 studies of which eight were included in the meta-analyses. The mean systolic CPBP-daytime ABPM difference was small [+1.6 mmHg (95% confidence interval −1.2 to 4.3) three studies, n = 319]. CPBP was significantly higher than 24-h ABPM [+7.8 mmHg (95% confidence interval 1.5–14.1) three studies n = 429]. Comparisons with general practitioner clinic readings (six studies, n = 2100) were inconclusive with significant heterogeneity between studies. CPBP and home BP monitoring readings (five studies, n = 1848) were nonsignificantly different. Diastolic comparisons mirrored systolic comparisons in all but the CPBP-daytime ABPM comparison, where CPBP was significantly higher. CONCLUSION: Current evidence around the clinical interpretation of CPBP is inconclusive. Although this review suggests that adopting the 135/85 mmHg threshold for hypertension might be reasonable and potentially result in a higher sensitivity for detecting patients with truly raised BP in pharmacies, the impact of this lower threshold on increased referrals to general practice clinics must be considered. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017-10 2017-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5585128/ /pubmed/28594707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000001443 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle Reviews
Albasri, Ali
O'Sullivan, Jack W.
Roberts, Nia W.
Prinjha, Suman
McManus, Richard J.
Sheppard, James P.
A comparison of blood pressure in community pharmacies with ambulatory, home and general practitioner office readings: systematic review and meta-analysis
title A comparison of blood pressure in community pharmacies with ambulatory, home and general practitioner office readings: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full A comparison of blood pressure in community pharmacies with ambulatory, home and general practitioner office readings: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr A comparison of blood pressure in community pharmacies with ambulatory, home and general practitioner office readings: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of blood pressure in community pharmacies with ambulatory, home and general practitioner office readings: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short A comparison of blood pressure in community pharmacies with ambulatory, home and general practitioner office readings: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of blood pressure in community pharmacies with ambulatory, home and general practitioner office readings: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5585128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28594707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000001443
work_keys_str_mv AT albasriali acomparisonofbloodpressureincommunitypharmacieswithambulatoryhomeandgeneralpractitionerofficereadingssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT osullivanjackw acomparisonofbloodpressureincommunitypharmacieswithambulatoryhomeandgeneralpractitionerofficereadingssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT robertsniaw acomparisonofbloodpressureincommunitypharmacieswithambulatoryhomeandgeneralpractitionerofficereadingssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT prinjhasuman acomparisonofbloodpressureincommunitypharmacieswithambulatoryhomeandgeneralpractitionerofficereadingssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mcmanusrichardj acomparisonofbloodpressureincommunitypharmacieswithambulatoryhomeandgeneralpractitionerofficereadingssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sheppardjamesp acomparisonofbloodpressureincommunitypharmacieswithambulatoryhomeandgeneralpractitionerofficereadingssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT albasriali comparisonofbloodpressureincommunitypharmacieswithambulatoryhomeandgeneralpractitionerofficereadingssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT osullivanjackw comparisonofbloodpressureincommunitypharmacieswithambulatoryhomeandgeneralpractitionerofficereadingssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT robertsniaw comparisonofbloodpressureincommunitypharmacieswithambulatoryhomeandgeneralpractitionerofficereadingssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT prinjhasuman comparisonofbloodpressureincommunitypharmacieswithambulatoryhomeandgeneralpractitionerofficereadingssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mcmanusrichardj comparisonofbloodpressureincommunitypharmacieswithambulatoryhomeandgeneralpractitionerofficereadingssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sheppardjamesp comparisonofbloodpressureincommunitypharmacieswithambulatoryhomeandgeneralpractitionerofficereadingssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis