Cargando…

Oxygen Uptake Kinetics Is Slower in Swimming Than Arm Cranking and Cycling during Heavy Intensity

Oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]) kinetics has been reported to be influenced by the activity mode. However, only few studies have compared [Formula: see text] O(2) kinetics between activities in the same subjects in which they were equally trained. Therefore, this study compared the [Formula: see...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sousa, Ana, Borrani, Fabio, Rodríguez, Ferran A., Millet, Grégoire P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5585224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28919863
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00639
_version_ 1783261576829075456
author Sousa, Ana
Borrani, Fabio
Rodríguez, Ferran A.
Millet, Grégoire P.
author_facet Sousa, Ana
Borrani, Fabio
Rodríguez, Ferran A.
Millet, Grégoire P.
author_sort Sousa, Ana
collection PubMed
description Oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]) kinetics has been reported to be influenced by the activity mode. However, only few studies have compared [Formula: see text] O(2) kinetics between activities in the same subjects in which they were equally trained. Therefore, this study compared the [Formula: see text] O(2) kinetics response to swimming, arm cranking, and cycling within the same group of subjects within the heavy exercise intensity domain. Ten trained male triathletes (age 23.2 ± 4.5 years; height 180.8 ± 8.3 cm; weight 72.3 ± 6.6 kg) completed an incremental test to exhaustion and a 6-min heavy constant-load test in the three exercise modes in random order. Gas exchange was measured by a breath-by-breath analyzer and the on-transient [Formula: see text] O(2) kinetics was modeled using bi-exponential functions. [Formula: see text] O(2peak) was higher in cycling (65.6 ± 4.0 ml·kg(−1)·min(−1)) than in arm cranking or swimming (48.7 ± 8.0 and 53.0 ± 6.7 ml·kg(−1)·min(−1); P < 0.01), but the [Formula: see text] O(2) kinetics were slower in swimming (τ(1) = 31.7 ± 6.2 s) than in arm cranking (19.3 ± 4.2 s; P = 0.001) and cycling (12.4 ± 3.7 s; P = 0.001). The amplitude of the primary component was lower in both arm cranking and swimming (21.9 ± 4.7 and 28.4 ± 5.1 ml·kg(−1)·min(−1)) compared with cycling (39.4 ± 4.1 ml·kg(−1)·min(−1); P = 0.001). Although the gain of the primary component was higher in arm cranking compared with cycling (15.3 ± 4.2 and 10.7 ± 1.3 ml·min(−1)·W(−1); P = 0.02), the slow component amplitude, in both absolute and relative terms, did not differ between exercise modes. The slower [Formula: see text] O(2) kinetics during heavy-intensity swimming is exercise-mode dependent. Besides differences in muscle mass and greater type II muscle fibers recruitment, the horizontal position adopted and the involvement of trunk and lower-body stabilizing muscles could be additional mechanisms that explain the differences between exercise modalities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5585224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55852242017-09-15 Oxygen Uptake Kinetics Is Slower in Swimming Than Arm Cranking and Cycling during Heavy Intensity Sousa, Ana Borrani, Fabio Rodríguez, Ferran A. Millet, Grégoire P. Front Physiol Physiology Oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]) kinetics has been reported to be influenced by the activity mode. However, only few studies have compared [Formula: see text] O(2) kinetics between activities in the same subjects in which they were equally trained. Therefore, this study compared the [Formula: see text] O(2) kinetics response to swimming, arm cranking, and cycling within the same group of subjects within the heavy exercise intensity domain. Ten trained male triathletes (age 23.2 ± 4.5 years; height 180.8 ± 8.3 cm; weight 72.3 ± 6.6 kg) completed an incremental test to exhaustion and a 6-min heavy constant-load test in the three exercise modes in random order. Gas exchange was measured by a breath-by-breath analyzer and the on-transient [Formula: see text] O(2) kinetics was modeled using bi-exponential functions. [Formula: see text] O(2peak) was higher in cycling (65.6 ± 4.0 ml·kg(−1)·min(−1)) than in arm cranking or swimming (48.7 ± 8.0 and 53.0 ± 6.7 ml·kg(−1)·min(−1); P < 0.01), but the [Formula: see text] O(2) kinetics were slower in swimming (τ(1) = 31.7 ± 6.2 s) than in arm cranking (19.3 ± 4.2 s; P = 0.001) and cycling (12.4 ± 3.7 s; P = 0.001). The amplitude of the primary component was lower in both arm cranking and swimming (21.9 ± 4.7 and 28.4 ± 5.1 ml·kg(−1)·min(−1)) compared with cycling (39.4 ± 4.1 ml·kg(−1)·min(−1); P = 0.001). Although the gain of the primary component was higher in arm cranking compared with cycling (15.3 ± 4.2 and 10.7 ± 1.3 ml·min(−1)·W(−1); P = 0.02), the slow component amplitude, in both absolute and relative terms, did not differ between exercise modes. The slower [Formula: see text] O(2) kinetics during heavy-intensity swimming is exercise-mode dependent. Besides differences in muscle mass and greater type II muscle fibers recruitment, the horizontal position adopted and the involvement of trunk and lower-body stabilizing muscles could be additional mechanisms that explain the differences between exercise modalities. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5585224/ /pubmed/28919863 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00639 Text en Copyright © 2017 Sousa, Borrani, Rodríguez and Millet. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Sousa, Ana
Borrani, Fabio
Rodríguez, Ferran A.
Millet, Grégoire P.
Oxygen Uptake Kinetics Is Slower in Swimming Than Arm Cranking and Cycling during Heavy Intensity
title Oxygen Uptake Kinetics Is Slower in Swimming Than Arm Cranking and Cycling during Heavy Intensity
title_full Oxygen Uptake Kinetics Is Slower in Swimming Than Arm Cranking and Cycling during Heavy Intensity
title_fullStr Oxygen Uptake Kinetics Is Slower in Swimming Than Arm Cranking and Cycling during Heavy Intensity
title_full_unstemmed Oxygen Uptake Kinetics Is Slower in Swimming Than Arm Cranking and Cycling during Heavy Intensity
title_short Oxygen Uptake Kinetics Is Slower in Swimming Than Arm Cranking and Cycling during Heavy Intensity
title_sort oxygen uptake kinetics is slower in swimming than arm cranking and cycling during heavy intensity
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5585224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28919863
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00639
work_keys_str_mv AT sousaana oxygenuptakekineticsisslowerinswimmingthanarmcrankingandcyclingduringheavyintensity
AT borranifabio oxygenuptakekineticsisslowerinswimmingthanarmcrankingandcyclingduringheavyintensity
AT rodriguezferrana oxygenuptakekineticsisslowerinswimmingthanarmcrankingandcyclingduringheavyintensity
AT milletgregoirep oxygenuptakekineticsisslowerinswimmingthanarmcrankingandcyclingduringheavyintensity