Cargando…

Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of three current guidelines for the evaluation of asymptomatic pancreatic cystic neoplasms

Asymptomatic pancreatic cysts are a common clinical problem but only a minority of these cases progress to cancer. Our aim was to compare the accuracy to detect malignancy of the 2015 American Gastroenterological Association (AGA), the 2012 International Consensus/Fukuoka (Fukuoka guidelines [FG]),...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Ming-ming, Yin, Shi, Siddiqui, Ali A., Salem, Ronald R., Schrope, Beth, Sethi, Amrita, Poneros, John M., Gress, Frank G., Genkinger, Jeanine M., Do, Catherine, Brooks, Christian A., Chabot, John A., Kluger, Michael D., Kowalski, Thomas, Loren, David E., Aslanian, Harry, Farrell, James J., Gonda, Tamas A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5585501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28858107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007900
_version_ 1783261640505950208
author Xu, Ming-ming
Yin, Shi
Siddiqui, Ali A.
Salem, Ronald R.
Schrope, Beth
Sethi, Amrita
Poneros, John M.
Gress, Frank G.
Genkinger, Jeanine M.
Do, Catherine
Brooks, Christian A.
Chabot, John A.
Kluger, Michael D.
Kowalski, Thomas
Loren, David E.
Aslanian, Harry
Farrell, James J.
Gonda, Tamas A.
author_facet Xu, Ming-ming
Yin, Shi
Siddiqui, Ali A.
Salem, Ronald R.
Schrope, Beth
Sethi, Amrita
Poneros, John M.
Gress, Frank G.
Genkinger, Jeanine M.
Do, Catherine
Brooks, Christian A.
Chabot, John A.
Kluger, Michael D.
Kowalski, Thomas
Loren, David E.
Aslanian, Harry
Farrell, James J.
Gonda, Tamas A.
author_sort Xu, Ming-ming
collection PubMed
description Asymptomatic pancreatic cysts are a common clinical problem but only a minority of these cases progress to cancer. Our aim was to compare the accuracy to detect malignancy of the 2015 American Gastroenterological Association (AGA), the 2012 International Consensus/Fukuoka (Fukuoka guidelines [FG]), and the 2010 American College of Radiology (ACR) guidelines. We conducted a retrospective study at 3 referral centers for all patients who underwent resection for an asymptomatic pancreatic cyst between January 2008 and December 2013. We compared the accuracy of 3 guidelines in predicting high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or cancer in resected cysts. We performed logistic regression analyses to examine the association between cyst features and risk of HGD or cancer. A total of 269 patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 228 (84.8%) had a benign diagnosis or low-grade dysplasia on surgical pathology, and 41 patients (15.2%) had either HGD (n = 14) or invasive cancer (n = 27). Of the 41 patients with HGD or cancer on resection, only 3 patients would have met the AGA guideline's indications for resection based on the preoperative cyst characteristics, whereas 30/41 patients would have met the FG criteria for resection and 22/41 patients met the ACR criteria. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of HGD, and/or cancer of the AGA guidelines were 7.3%, 88.2%, 10%, and 84.1%, compared to 73.2%, 45.6%, 19.5%, and 90.4% for the FG and 53.7%, 61%, 19.8%, and 88% for the ACR guidelines. In multivariable analysis, cyst size >3 cm, compared to ≤3 cm, (odds ratio [OR] = 2.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11, 4.2) and each year increase in age (OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.03, 1.11) were positively associated with risk of HGD or cancer on resection. In patients with asymptomatic branch duct-intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms or mucinous cystic neoplasms who underwent resection, the prevalence rate of HGD or cancer was 15.2%. Using the 2015 AGA criteria for resection would have missed 92.6% of patients with HGD or cancer. The more “inclusive” FG and ACR had a higher sensitivity for HGD or cancer but lower specificity. Given the current deficiencies of these guidelines, it will be important to determine the acceptable rate of false-positives in order to prevent a single true-positive.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5585501
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55855012017-09-11 Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of three current guidelines for the evaluation of asymptomatic pancreatic cystic neoplasms Xu, Ming-ming Yin, Shi Siddiqui, Ali A. Salem, Ronald R. Schrope, Beth Sethi, Amrita Poneros, John M. Gress, Frank G. Genkinger, Jeanine M. Do, Catherine Brooks, Christian A. Chabot, John A. Kluger, Michael D. Kowalski, Thomas Loren, David E. Aslanian, Harry Farrell, James J. Gonda, Tamas A. Medicine (Baltimore) 4500 Asymptomatic pancreatic cysts are a common clinical problem but only a minority of these cases progress to cancer. Our aim was to compare the accuracy to detect malignancy of the 2015 American Gastroenterological Association (AGA), the 2012 International Consensus/Fukuoka (Fukuoka guidelines [FG]), and the 2010 American College of Radiology (ACR) guidelines. We conducted a retrospective study at 3 referral centers for all patients who underwent resection for an asymptomatic pancreatic cyst between January 2008 and December 2013. We compared the accuracy of 3 guidelines in predicting high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or cancer in resected cysts. We performed logistic regression analyses to examine the association between cyst features and risk of HGD or cancer. A total of 269 patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 228 (84.8%) had a benign diagnosis or low-grade dysplasia on surgical pathology, and 41 patients (15.2%) had either HGD (n = 14) or invasive cancer (n = 27). Of the 41 patients with HGD or cancer on resection, only 3 patients would have met the AGA guideline's indications for resection based on the preoperative cyst characteristics, whereas 30/41 patients would have met the FG criteria for resection and 22/41 patients met the ACR criteria. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of HGD, and/or cancer of the AGA guidelines were 7.3%, 88.2%, 10%, and 84.1%, compared to 73.2%, 45.6%, 19.5%, and 90.4% for the FG and 53.7%, 61%, 19.8%, and 88% for the ACR guidelines. In multivariable analysis, cyst size >3 cm, compared to ≤3 cm, (odds ratio [OR] = 2.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11, 4.2) and each year increase in age (OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.03, 1.11) were positively associated with risk of HGD or cancer on resection. In patients with asymptomatic branch duct-intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms or mucinous cystic neoplasms who underwent resection, the prevalence rate of HGD or cancer was 15.2%. Using the 2015 AGA criteria for resection would have missed 92.6% of patients with HGD or cancer. The more “inclusive” FG and ACR had a higher sensitivity for HGD or cancer but lower specificity. Given the current deficiencies of these guidelines, it will be important to determine the acceptable rate of false-positives in order to prevent a single true-positive. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5585501/ /pubmed/28858107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007900 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives License 4.0, which allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0
spellingShingle 4500
Xu, Ming-ming
Yin, Shi
Siddiqui, Ali A.
Salem, Ronald R.
Schrope, Beth
Sethi, Amrita
Poneros, John M.
Gress, Frank G.
Genkinger, Jeanine M.
Do, Catherine
Brooks, Christian A.
Chabot, John A.
Kluger, Michael D.
Kowalski, Thomas
Loren, David E.
Aslanian, Harry
Farrell, James J.
Gonda, Tamas A.
Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of three current guidelines for the evaluation of asymptomatic pancreatic cystic neoplasms
title Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of three current guidelines for the evaluation of asymptomatic pancreatic cystic neoplasms
title_full Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of three current guidelines for the evaluation of asymptomatic pancreatic cystic neoplasms
title_fullStr Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of three current guidelines for the evaluation of asymptomatic pancreatic cystic neoplasms
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of three current guidelines for the evaluation of asymptomatic pancreatic cystic neoplasms
title_short Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of three current guidelines for the evaluation of asymptomatic pancreatic cystic neoplasms
title_sort comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of three current guidelines for the evaluation of asymptomatic pancreatic cystic neoplasms
topic 4500
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5585501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28858107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007900
work_keys_str_mv AT xumingming comparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyofthreecurrentguidelinesfortheevaluationofasymptomaticpancreaticcysticneoplasms
AT yinshi comparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyofthreecurrentguidelinesfortheevaluationofasymptomaticpancreaticcysticneoplasms
AT siddiquialia comparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyofthreecurrentguidelinesfortheevaluationofasymptomaticpancreaticcysticneoplasms
AT salemronaldr comparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyofthreecurrentguidelinesfortheevaluationofasymptomaticpancreaticcysticneoplasms
AT schropebeth comparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyofthreecurrentguidelinesfortheevaluationofasymptomaticpancreaticcysticneoplasms
AT sethiamrita comparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyofthreecurrentguidelinesfortheevaluationofasymptomaticpancreaticcysticneoplasms
AT ponerosjohnm comparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyofthreecurrentguidelinesfortheevaluationofasymptomaticpancreaticcysticneoplasms
AT gressfrankg comparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyofthreecurrentguidelinesfortheevaluationofasymptomaticpancreaticcysticneoplasms
AT genkingerjeaninem comparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyofthreecurrentguidelinesfortheevaluationofasymptomaticpancreaticcysticneoplasms
AT docatherine comparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyofthreecurrentguidelinesfortheevaluationofasymptomaticpancreaticcysticneoplasms
AT brookschristiana comparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyofthreecurrentguidelinesfortheevaluationofasymptomaticpancreaticcysticneoplasms
AT chabotjohna comparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyofthreecurrentguidelinesfortheevaluationofasymptomaticpancreaticcysticneoplasms
AT klugermichaeld comparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyofthreecurrentguidelinesfortheevaluationofasymptomaticpancreaticcysticneoplasms
AT kowalskithomas comparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyofthreecurrentguidelinesfortheevaluationofasymptomaticpancreaticcysticneoplasms
AT lorendavide comparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyofthreecurrentguidelinesfortheevaluationofasymptomaticpancreaticcysticneoplasms
AT aslanianharry comparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyofthreecurrentguidelinesfortheevaluationofasymptomaticpancreaticcysticneoplasms
AT farrelljamesj comparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyofthreecurrentguidelinesfortheevaluationofasymptomaticpancreaticcysticneoplasms
AT gondatamasa comparisonofthediagnosticaccuracyofthreecurrentguidelinesfortheevaluationofasymptomaticpancreaticcysticneoplasms