Cargando…
Novel and Simple Ultrasonographic Methods for Estimating the Abdominal Visceral Fat Area
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the abdominal visceral fat area (VFA), we developed novel ultrasonographic (US) methods for estimating. METHODS: 100 male volunteers were recruited, and their VFA was calculated by two novel US methods, the triangle method and the ellipse method. The VFA calculated by these m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5585558/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29093737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8796069 |
_version_ | 1783261653663481856 |
---|---|
author | Asano, Takeharu Kubota, Naoto Koizumi, Norihiro Itani, Kazunori Mitake, Tsuyoshi Yuhashi, Kazuhito Liao, Hongen Mitsuishi, Mamoru Takeishi, Shigemi Takahashi, Toshiaki Ohnishi, Shin Sasaki, Shiro Sakuma, Ichiro Kadowaki, Takashi |
author_facet | Asano, Takeharu Kubota, Naoto Koizumi, Norihiro Itani, Kazunori Mitake, Tsuyoshi Yuhashi, Kazuhito Liao, Hongen Mitsuishi, Mamoru Takeishi, Shigemi Takahashi, Toshiaki Ohnishi, Shin Sasaki, Shiro Sakuma, Ichiro Kadowaki, Takashi |
author_sort | Asano, Takeharu |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the abdominal visceral fat area (VFA), we developed novel ultrasonographic (US) methods for estimating. METHODS: 100 male volunteers were recruited, and their VFA was calculated by two novel US methods, the triangle method and the ellipse method. The VFA calculated by these methods was compared with the VFA calculated by CT. RESULTS: Both the VFA calculated by the triangle method (r = 0.766, p < 0.001) and the ellipse method (r = 0.781, p < 0.001) showed a high correlation coefficient with the VFA calculated by CT. Also, the VFA calculated by our novel methods were significantly increased in subjects with one or more metabolic risk factors than in those without any risk factors. Furthermore, the correlation coefficients obtained using the two methods were enhanced by the addition of multiple regression analysis (with the triangle method, r = 0.8586, p < 0.001; with the ellipse method, r = 0.8642, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The VFA calculated by the triangle or ellipse method showed a high correlation coefficient with the VFA calculated by CT. These US methods are easy to use, they involve no radiation exposure, and the measurements can be conducted frequently. We hope that our simple methods would be widely adopted for the evaluation of VFA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5585558 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55855582017-11-01 Novel and Simple Ultrasonographic Methods for Estimating the Abdominal Visceral Fat Area Asano, Takeharu Kubota, Naoto Koizumi, Norihiro Itani, Kazunori Mitake, Tsuyoshi Yuhashi, Kazuhito Liao, Hongen Mitsuishi, Mamoru Takeishi, Shigemi Takahashi, Toshiaki Ohnishi, Shin Sasaki, Shiro Sakuma, Ichiro Kadowaki, Takashi Int J Endocrinol Research Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the abdominal visceral fat area (VFA), we developed novel ultrasonographic (US) methods for estimating. METHODS: 100 male volunteers were recruited, and their VFA was calculated by two novel US methods, the triangle method and the ellipse method. The VFA calculated by these methods was compared with the VFA calculated by CT. RESULTS: Both the VFA calculated by the triangle method (r = 0.766, p < 0.001) and the ellipse method (r = 0.781, p < 0.001) showed a high correlation coefficient with the VFA calculated by CT. Also, the VFA calculated by our novel methods were significantly increased in subjects with one or more metabolic risk factors than in those without any risk factors. Furthermore, the correlation coefficients obtained using the two methods were enhanced by the addition of multiple regression analysis (with the triangle method, r = 0.8586, p < 0.001; with the ellipse method, r = 0.8642, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The VFA calculated by the triangle or ellipse method showed a high correlation coefficient with the VFA calculated by CT. These US methods are easy to use, they involve no radiation exposure, and the measurements can be conducted frequently. We hope that our simple methods would be widely adopted for the evaluation of VFA. Hindawi 2017 2017-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5585558/ /pubmed/29093737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8796069 Text en Copyright © 2017 Takeharu Asano et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Asano, Takeharu Kubota, Naoto Koizumi, Norihiro Itani, Kazunori Mitake, Tsuyoshi Yuhashi, Kazuhito Liao, Hongen Mitsuishi, Mamoru Takeishi, Shigemi Takahashi, Toshiaki Ohnishi, Shin Sasaki, Shiro Sakuma, Ichiro Kadowaki, Takashi Novel and Simple Ultrasonographic Methods for Estimating the Abdominal Visceral Fat Area |
title | Novel and Simple Ultrasonographic Methods for Estimating the Abdominal Visceral Fat Area |
title_full | Novel and Simple Ultrasonographic Methods for Estimating the Abdominal Visceral Fat Area |
title_fullStr | Novel and Simple Ultrasonographic Methods for Estimating the Abdominal Visceral Fat Area |
title_full_unstemmed | Novel and Simple Ultrasonographic Methods for Estimating the Abdominal Visceral Fat Area |
title_short | Novel and Simple Ultrasonographic Methods for Estimating the Abdominal Visceral Fat Area |
title_sort | novel and simple ultrasonographic methods for estimating the abdominal visceral fat area |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5585558/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29093737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8796069 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT asanotakeharu novelandsimpleultrasonographicmethodsforestimatingtheabdominalvisceralfatarea AT kubotanaoto novelandsimpleultrasonographicmethodsforestimatingtheabdominalvisceralfatarea AT koizuminorihiro novelandsimpleultrasonographicmethodsforestimatingtheabdominalvisceralfatarea AT itanikazunori novelandsimpleultrasonographicmethodsforestimatingtheabdominalvisceralfatarea AT mitaketsuyoshi novelandsimpleultrasonographicmethodsforestimatingtheabdominalvisceralfatarea AT yuhashikazuhito novelandsimpleultrasonographicmethodsforestimatingtheabdominalvisceralfatarea AT liaohongen novelandsimpleultrasonographicmethodsforestimatingtheabdominalvisceralfatarea AT mitsuishimamoru novelandsimpleultrasonographicmethodsforestimatingtheabdominalvisceralfatarea AT takeishishigemi novelandsimpleultrasonographicmethodsforestimatingtheabdominalvisceralfatarea AT takahashitoshiaki novelandsimpleultrasonographicmethodsforestimatingtheabdominalvisceralfatarea AT ohnishishin novelandsimpleultrasonographicmethodsforestimatingtheabdominalvisceralfatarea AT sasakishiro novelandsimpleultrasonographicmethodsforestimatingtheabdominalvisceralfatarea AT sakumaichiro novelandsimpleultrasonographicmethodsforestimatingtheabdominalvisceralfatarea AT kadowakitakashi novelandsimpleultrasonographicmethodsforestimatingtheabdominalvisceralfatarea |