Cargando…

Household Financial Burden and Poverty Impacts of Cancer Treatment in Vietnam

PURPOSE: This paper aims to analyze the household financial burden and poverty impacts of cancer treatment in Vietnam. METHODS: Under the “ASEAN CosTs in ONcology” study design, three major specialized cancer hospitals were employed to assemble the Vietnamese data. Factors of socioeconomic, direct,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoang, Van Minh, Pham, Cam Phuong, Vu, Quynh Mai, Ngo, Thuy Trang, Tran, Dinh Ha, Bui, Dieu, Pham, Xuan Dung, Tran, Dang Khoa, Mai, Trong Khoa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5585616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28904976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9350147
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: This paper aims to analyze the household financial burden and poverty impacts of cancer treatment in Vietnam. METHODS: Under the “ASEAN CosTs in ONcology” study design, three major specialized cancer hospitals were employed to assemble the Vietnamese data. Factors of socioeconomic, direct, and indirect costs of healthcare were collected prospectively through both individual interviews and hospital financial records. RESULTS: The rates of catastrophic expenditure based on the cut-off points of 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% of household's income were 82.6%, 73.7%, 64.7%, and 56.9%, respectively. 37.4% of the households with patient were impoverished by the treatment costs for cancer. The statistically significant correlates of the impoverishment problem were higher among older patients (40–60 years: 1.77, 95% CI 1.14–2.73; above 60 years: 1.75, 95% CI 1.03–2.98); poorer patients (less than 100% national income: 29, 95% CI 18.6–45.24; less than 200% national income: 2.89, 95% CI 1.69–4.93); patients who underwent surgery alone (receiving nonsurgery treatment: 2.46, 95% CI 1.32–4.59; receiving multiple treatments: 2.4, 95% CI 1.38–4.17). CONCLUSIONS: Lots of households were pushed into poverty due to their expenditure on cancer care; more actions are urgently needed to improve financial protection to the vulnerable groups.