Cargando…

A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Twice Daily PPIs versus Once Daily for Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

BACKGROUND: To investigate whether PPIs BID is superior to QD for treatment of GERD in a short time. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, EMBASE, Ovid, EBSCO, and Web of Science databases (from 1998 to May 2016) to select RCTs, which compared the efficacy of PPIs BID versus QD for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Hongying, Yang, Zhiping, Ni, Zhen, Shi, Yongquan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5585660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28912807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9865963
_version_ 1783261677421068288
author Zhang, Hongying
Yang, Zhiping
Ni, Zhen
Shi, Yongquan
author_facet Zhang, Hongying
Yang, Zhiping
Ni, Zhen
Shi, Yongquan
author_sort Zhang, Hongying
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To investigate whether PPIs BID is superior to QD for treatment of GERD in a short time. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, EMBASE, Ovid, EBSCO, and Web of Science databases (from 1998 to May 2016) to select RCTs, which compared the efficacy of PPIs BID versus QD for GERD. The primary outcomes were symptom relief or esophageal mucosal healing at weeks 4 and 8. The M-H method with fixed-effect or random-effect model was used to calculate RR and 95% CIs. RESULTS: Seven RCTs were enrolled. The esophageal healing rates were higher in PPIs BID group (P = 0.01), and rabeprazole 20 mg BID can achieve better mucosal healing than 20 mg QD after 8 weeks (P < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed in heartburn relief (P = 0.27), sustained symptom relief rates at week 4 (P = 0.05), 24 h pH monitoring after treatment (P = 0.11), endoscopic response at week 4 (P = 0.22), and adverse events (P = 0.18). CONCLUSION: PPIs BID more effectively improve endoscopic healing rate at week 8 than PPIs QD. But there are no significant differences in symptom relief, 24 h pH monitoring, sustained symptom relief, and endoscopic response at week 4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5585660
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55856602017-09-14 A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Twice Daily PPIs versus Once Daily for Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Zhang, Hongying Yang, Zhiping Ni, Zhen Shi, Yongquan Gastroenterol Res Pract Review Article BACKGROUND: To investigate whether PPIs BID is superior to QD for treatment of GERD in a short time. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, EMBASE, Ovid, EBSCO, and Web of Science databases (from 1998 to May 2016) to select RCTs, which compared the efficacy of PPIs BID versus QD for GERD. The primary outcomes were symptom relief or esophageal mucosal healing at weeks 4 and 8. The M-H method with fixed-effect or random-effect model was used to calculate RR and 95% CIs. RESULTS: Seven RCTs were enrolled. The esophageal healing rates were higher in PPIs BID group (P = 0.01), and rabeprazole 20 mg BID can achieve better mucosal healing than 20 mg QD after 8 weeks (P < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed in heartburn relief (P = 0.27), sustained symptom relief rates at week 4 (P = 0.05), 24 h pH monitoring after treatment (P = 0.11), endoscopic response at week 4 (P = 0.22), and adverse events (P = 0.18). CONCLUSION: PPIs BID more effectively improve endoscopic healing rate at week 8 than PPIs QD. But there are no significant differences in symptom relief, 24 h pH monitoring, sustained symptom relief, and endoscopic response at week 4. Hindawi 2017 2017-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5585660/ /pubmed/28912807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9865963 Text en Copyright © 2017 Hongying Zhang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Zhang, Hongying
Yang, Zhiping
Ni, Zhen
Shi, Yongquan
A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Twice Daily PPIs versus Once Daily for Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
title A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Twice Daily PPIs versus Once Daily for Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
title_full A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Twice Daily PPIs versus Once Daily for Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
title_fullStr A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Twice Daily PPIs versus Once Daily for Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
title_full_unstemmed A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Twice Daily PPIs versus Once Daily for Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
title_short A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Twice Daily PPIs versus Once Daily for Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
title_sort meta-analysis and systematic review of the efficacy of twice daily ppis versus once daily for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5585660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28912807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9865963
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanghongying ametaanalysisandsystematicreviewoftheefficacyoftwicedailyppisversusoncedailyfortreatmentofgastroesophagealrefluxdisease
AT yangzhiping ametaanalysisandsystematicreviewoftheefficacyoftwicedailyppisversusoncedailyfortreatmentofgastroesophagealrefluxdisease
AT nizhen ametaanalysisandsystematicreviewoftheefficacyoftwicedailyppisversusoncedailyfortreatmentofgastroesophagealrefluxdisease
AT shiyongquan ametaanalysisandsystematicreviewoftheefficacyoftwicedailyppisversusoncedailyfortreatmentofgastroesophagealrefluxdisease
AT zhanghongying metaanalysisandsystematicreviewoftheefficacyoftwicedailyppisversusoncedailyfortreatmentofgastroesophagealrefluxdisease
AT yangzhiping metaanalysisandsystematicreviewoftheefficacyoftwicedailyppisversusoncedailyfortreatmentofgastroesophagealrefluxdisease
AT nizhen metaanalysisandsystematicreviewoftheefficacyoftwicedailyppisversusoncedailyfortreatmentofgastroesophagealrefluxdisease
AT shiyongquan metaanalysisandsystematicreviewoftheefficacyoftwicedailyppisversusoncedailyfortreatmentofgastroesophagealrefluxdisease