Cargando…
A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Twice Daily PPIs versus Once Daily for Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
BACKGROUND: To investigate whether PPIs BID is superior to QD for treatment of GERD in a short time. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, EMBASE, Ovid, EBSCO, and Web of Science databases (from 1998 to May 2016) to select RCTs, which compared the efficacy of PPIs BID versus QD for...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5585660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28912807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9865963 |
_version_ | 1783261677421068288 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Hongying Yang, Zhiping Ni, Zhen Shi, Yongquan |
author_facet | Zhang, Hongying Yang, Zhiping Ni, Zhen Shi, Yongquan |
author_sort | Zhang, Hongying |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To investigate whether PPIs BID is superior to QD for treatment of GERD in a short time. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, EMBASE, Ovid, EBSCO, and Web of Science databases (from 1998 to May 2016) to select RCTs, which compared the efficacy of PPIs BID versus QD for GERD. The primary outcomes were symptom relief or esophageal mucosal healing at weeks 4 and 8. The M-H method with fixed-effect or random-effect model was used to calculate RR and 95% CIs. RESULTS: Seven RCTs were enrolled. The esophageal healing rates were higher in PPIs BID group (P = 0.01), and rabeprazole 20 mg BID can achieve better mucosal healing than 20 mg QD after 8 weeks (P < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed in heartburn relief (P = 0.27), sustained symptom relief rates at week 4 (P = 0.05), 24 h pH monitoring after treatment (P = 0.11), endoscopic response at week 4 (P = 0.22), and adverse events (P = 0.18). CONCLUSION: PPIs BID more effectively improve endoscopic healing rate at week 8 than PPIs QD. But there are no significant differences in symptom relief, 24 h pH monitoring, sustained symptom relief, and endoscopic response at week 4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5585660 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55856602017-09-14 A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Twice Daily PPIs versus Once Daily for Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Zhang, Hongying Yang, Zhiping Ni, Zhen Shi, Yongquan Gastroenterol Res Pract Review Article BACKGROUND: To investigate whether PPIs BID is superior to QD for treatment of GERD in a short time. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, EMBASE, Ovid, EBSCO, and Web of Science databases (from 1998 to May 2016) to select RCTs, which compared the efficacy of PPIs BID versus QD for GERD. The primary outcomes were symptom relief or esophageal mucosal healing at weeks 4 and 8. The M-H method with fixed-effect or random-effect model was used to calculate RR and 95% CIs. RESULTS: Seven RCTs were enrolled. The esophageal healing rates were higher in PPIs BID group (P = 0.01), and rabeprazole 20 mg BID can achieve better mucosal healing than 20 mg QD after 8 weeks (P < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed in heartburn relief (P = 0.27), sustained symptom relief rates at week 4 (P = 0.05), 24 h pH monitoring after treatment (P = 0.11), endoscopic response at week 4 (P = 0.22), and adverse events (P = 0.18). CONCLUSION: PPIs BID more effectively improve endoscopic healing rate at week 8 than PPIs QD. But there are no significant differences in symptom relief, 24 h pH monitoring, sustained symptom relief, and endoscopic response at week 4. Hindawi 2017 2017-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5585660/ /pubmed/28912807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9865963 Text en Copyright © 2017 Hongying Zhang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Zhang, Hongying Yang, Zhiping Ni, Zhen Shi, Yongquan A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Twice Daily PPIs versus Once Daily for Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease |
title | A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Twice Daily PPIs versus Once Daily for Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease |
title_full | A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Twice Daily PPIs versus Once Daily for Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease |
title_fullStr | A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Twice Daily PPIs versus Once Daily for Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease |
title_full_unstemmed | A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Twice Daily PPIs versus Once Daily for Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease |
title_short | A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Twice Daily PPIs versus Once Daily for Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease |
title_sort | meta-analysis and systematic review of the efficacy of twice daily ppis versus once daily for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5585660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28912807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9865963 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhanghongying ametaanalysisandsystematicreviewoftheefficacyoftwicedailyppisversusoncedailyfortreatmentofgastroesophagealrefluxdisease AT yangzhiping ametaanalysisandsystematicreviewoftheefficacyoftwicedailyppisversusoncedailyfortreatmentofgastroesophagealrefluxdisease AT nizhen ametaanalysisandsystematicreviewoftheefficacyoftwicedailyppisversusoncedailyfortreatmentofgastroesophagealrefluxdisease AT shiyongquan ametaanalysisandsystematicreviewoftheefficacyoftwicedailyppisversusoncedailyfortreatmentofgastroesophagealrefluxdisease AT zhanghongying metaanalysisandsystematicreviewoftheefficacyoftwicedailyppisversusoncedailyfortreatmentofgastroesophagealrefluxdisease AT yangzhiping metaanalysisandsystematicreviewoftheefficacyoftwicedailyppisversusoncedailyfortreatmentofgastroesophagealrefluxdisease AT nizhen metaanalysisandsystematicreviewoftheefficacyoftwicedailyppisversusoncedailyfortreatmentofgastroesophagealrefluxdisease AT shiyongquan metaanalysisandsystematicreviewoftheefficacyoftwicedailyppisversusoncedailyfortreatmentofgastroesophagealrefluxdisease |