Cargando…
Early intraprosthetic dislocation in dual-mobility implants: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Dual mobility implants are subject to a specific implant-related complication, intraprosthetic dislocation (IPD), in which the polyethylene liner dissociates from the femoral head. For older generation designs, IPD was attributable to late polyethylene wear and subsequent failure of the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5585769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28913407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2016.12.002 |
_version_ | 1783261692546777088 |
---|---|
author | De Martino, Ivan D'Apolito, Rocco Waddell, Bradford S. McLawhorn, Alexander S. Sculco, Peter K. Sculco, Thomas P. |
author_facet | De Martino, Ivan D'Apolito, Rocco Waddell, Bradford S. McLawhorn, Alexander S. Sculco, Peter K. Sculco, Thomas P. |
author_sort | De Martino, Ivan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Dual mobility implants are subject to a specific implant-related complication, intraprosthetic dislocation (IPD), in which the polyethylene liner dissociates from the femoral head. For older generation designs, IPD was attributable to late polyethylene wear and subsequent failure of the head capture mechanism. However, early IPDs have been reportedly affecting contemporary designs. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines was performed. A comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar was conducted for English articles between January 1974 and August 2016 using various combinations of the keywords “intraprosthetic dislocation,” “dual mobility,” “dual-mobility,” “tripolar,” “double mobility,” “double-mobility,” “hip,” “cup,” “socket,” and “dislocation.” RESULTS: In all, 16 articles met our inclusion criteria. Fourteen were case reports and 2 were retrospective case series. These included a total of 19 total hip arthroplasties, which were divided into 2 groups: studies dealing with early IPD after attempted closed reduction and those dealing with early IPD with no history of previous attempted closed reduction. Early IPD was reported in 15 patients after a mean follow-up of 3.2 months (2.9 SD) in the first group and in 4 patients after a mean follow-up of 15.1 months (9.9 SD) in the second group. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the current data, most cases have been preceded by an attempted closed reduction in the setting of outer, large articulation dislocation, perhaps indicating an iatrogenic etiology for early IPD. Recognition of this possible failure mode is essential to its prevention and treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5585769 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55857692017-09-14 Early intraprosthetic dislocation in dual-mobility implants: a systematic review De Martino, Ivan D'Apolito, Rocco Waddell, Bradford S. McLawhorn, Alexander S. Sculco, Peter K. Sculco, Thomas P. Arthroplast Today Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Dual mobility implants are subject to a specific implant-related complication, intraprosthetic dislocation (IPD), in which the polyethylene liner dissociates from the femoral head. For older generation designs, IPD was attributable to late polyethylene wear and subsequent failure of the head capture mechanism. However, early IPDs have been reportedly affecting contemporary designs. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines was performed. A comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar was conducted for English articles between January 1974 and August 2016 using various combinations of the keywords “intraprosthetic dislocation,” “dual mobility,” “dual-mobility,” “tripolar,” “double mobility,” “double-mobility,” “hip,” “cup,” “socket,” and “dislocation.” RESULTS: In all, 16 articles met our inclusion criteria. Fourteen were case reports and 2 were retrospective case series. These included a total of 19 total hip arthroplasties, which were divided into 2 groups: studies dealing with early IPD after attempted closed reduction and those dealing with early IPD with no history of previous attempted closed reduction. Early IPD was reported in 15 patients after a mean follow-up of 3.2 months (2.9 SD) in the first group and in 4 patients after a mean follow-up of 15.1 months (9.9 SD) in the second group. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the current data, most cases have been preceded by an attempted closed reduction in the setting of outer, large articulation dislocation, perhaps indicating an iatrogenic etiology for early IPD. Recognition of this possible failure mode is essential to its prevention and treatment. Elsevier 2017-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5585769/ /pubmed/28913407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2016.12.002 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review De Martino, Ivan D'Apolito, Rocco Waddell, Bradford S. McLawhorn, Alexander S. Sculco, Peter K. Sculco, Thomas P. Early intraprosthetic dislocation in dual-mobility implants: a systematic review |
title | Early intraprosthetic dislocation in dual-mobility implants: a systematic review |
title_full | Early intraprosthetic dislocation in dual-mobility implants: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Early intraprosthetic dislocation in dual-mobility implants: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Early intraprosthetic dislocation in dual-mobility implants: a systematic review |
title_short | Early intraprosthetic dislocation in dual-mobility implants: a systematic review |
title_sort | early intraprosthetic dislocation in dual-mobility implants: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5585769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28913407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2016.12.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT demartinoivan earlyintraprostheticdislocationindualmobilityimplantsasystematicreview AT dapolitorocco earlyintraprostheticdislocationindualmobilityimplantsasystematicreview AT waddellbradfords earlyintraprostheticdislocationindualmobilityimplantsasystematicreview AT mclawhornalexanders earlyintraprostheticdislocationindualmobilityimplantsasystematicreview AT sculcopeterk earlyintraprostheticdislocationindualmobilityimplantsasystematicreview AT sculcothomasp earlyintraprostheticdislocationindualmobilityimplantsasystematicreview |