Cargando…

Comparison of Hemodynamic Changes in Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia Versus Epidural Anesthesia Below the T10 Sensory Level in Unilateral Surgeries: a Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: Unilateral spinal anesthesia is used to limit the spread of block. The aim of the present study was to compare hemodynamic changes and complications in unilateral spinal anesthesia and epidural anesthesia below the T10 sensory level in unilateral surgeries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kiasari, Alieh Zamani, Babaei, Anahita, Alipour, Abbas, Motevalli, Shima, Baradari, Afshin Gholipour
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5585788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28974849
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2017.71.274-279
_version_ 1783261694419533824
author Kiasari, Alieh Zamani
Babaei, Anahita
Alipour, Abbas
Motevalli, Shima
Baradari, Afshin Gholipour
author_facet Kiasari, Alieh Zamani
Babaei, Anahita
Alipour, Abbas
Motevalli, Shima
Baradari, Afshin Gholipour
author_sort Kiasari, Alieh Zamani
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Unilateral spinal anesthesia is used to limit the spread of block. The aim of the present study was to compare hemodynamic changes and complications in unilateral spinal anesthesia and epidural anesthesia below the T10 sensory level in unilateral surgeries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this double-blind randomized clinical trial in total 120 patients were randomly divided into a unilateral spinal anesthesia group (Group S) and an epidural anesthesia group (Group E). Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rates were measured before and immediately after the administration of spinal or epidural anesthesia and then at 5-, 10-, 15-, 20-, 25-, and 30-min intervals. The rates of prescribed ephedrine and intraoperative respiratory arrest were recorded, in addition to postoperative nausea and vomiting, puncture headaches, and back pain during the first 24 h after the surgery. RESULTS: SBP, DBP, and MAP values initially showed a statistically significant downward trend in both groups (p = 0.001). The prevalence of hypotension in Group S was lower than in Group E, and the observed difference was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). The mean heart rate change in Group E was greater than in Group S, although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.68). The incidence of prescribed ephedrine in response to a critical hemodynamic situation was 5.1% (n = 3) and 75% (n = 42) in Group S and Group E, respectively (p = 0.0001). The incidence of headaches, back pain, and nausea/vomiting was 15.3%, 15.3%, and 10.2% in Group S and 1.8%, 30.4%, and 5.4% in Group E (p = 0.017, 0.07, and 0.49, respectively). CONCLUSION: Hemodynamic stability, reduced administration of ephedrine, a simple, low-cost technique, and adequate sensory and motor block are major advantages of unilateral spinal anesthesia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5585788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55857882017-10-03 Comparison of Hemodynamic Changes in Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia Versus Epidural Anesthesia Below the T10 Sensory Level in Unilateral Surgeries: a Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial Kiasari, Alieh Zamani Babaei, Anahita Alipour, Abbas Motevalli, Shima Baradari, Afshin Gholipour Med Arch Original Paper BACKGROUND: Unilateral spinal anesthesia is used to limit the spread of block. The aim of the present study was to compare hemodynamic changes and complications in unilateral spinal anesthesia and epidural anesthesia below the T10 sensory level in unilateral surgeries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this double-blind randomized clinical trial in total 120 patients were randomly divided into a unilateral spinal anesthesia group (Group S) and an epidural anesthesia group (Group E). Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rates were measured before and immediately after the administration of spinal or epidural anesthesia and then at 5-, 10-, 15-, 20-, 25-, and 30-min intervals. The rates of prescribed ephedrine and intraoperative respiratory arrest were recorded, in addition to postoperative nausea and vomiting, puncture headaches, and back pain during the first 24 h after the surgery. RESULTS: SBP, DBP, and MAP values initially showed a statistically significant downward trend in both groups (p = 0.001). The prevalence of hypotension in Group S was lower than in Group E, and the observed difference was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). The mean heart rate change in Group E was greater than in Group S, although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.68). The incidence of prescribed ephedrine in response to a critical hemodynamic situation was 5.1% (n = 3) and 75% (n = 42) in Group S and Group E, respectively (p = 0.0001). The incidence of headaches, back pain, and nausea/vomiting was 15.3%, 15.3%, and 10.2% in Group S and 1.8%, 30.4%, and 5.4% in Group E (p = 0.017, 0.07, and 0.49, respectively). CONCLUSION: Hemodynamic stability, reduced administration of ephedrine, a simple, low-cost technique, and adequate sensory and motor block are major advantages of unilateral spinal anesthesia. AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2017-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5585788/ /pubmed/28974849 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2017.71.274-279 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Alieh Zamani Kiasari, Anahita Babaei, Abbas Alipour, Shima Motevalli, Afshin Gholipour Baradari http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Kiasari, Alieh Zamani
Babaei, Anahita
Alipour, Abbas
Motevalli, Shima
Baradari, Afshin Gholipour
Comparison of Hemodynamic Changes in Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia Versus Epidural Anesthesia Below the T10 Sensory Level in Unilateral Surgeries: a Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title Comparison of Hemodynamic Changes in Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia Versus Epidural Anesthesia Below the T10 Sensory Level in Unilateral Surgeries: a Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Comparison of Hemodynamic Changes in Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia Versus Epidural Anesthesia Below the T10 Sensory Level in Unilateral Surgeries: a Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Comparison of Hemodynamic Changes in Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia Versus Epidural Anesthesia Below the T10 Sensory Level in Unilateral Surgeries: a Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Hemodynamic Changes in Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia Versus Epidural Anesthesia Below the T10 Sensory Level in Unilateral Surgeries: a Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Comparison of Hemodynamic Changes in Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia Versus Epidural Anesthesia Below the T10 Sensory Level in Unilateral Surgeries: a Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort comparison of hemodynamic changes in unilateral spinal anesthesia versus epidural anesthesia below the t10 sensory level in unilateral surgeries: a double-blind randomized clinical trial
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5585788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28974849
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2017.71.274-279
work_keys_str_mv AT kiasarialiehzamani comparisonofhemodynamicchangesinunilateralspinalanesthesiaversusepiduralanesthesiabelowthet10sensorylevelinunilateralsurgeriesadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT babaeianahita comparisonofhemodynamicchangesinunilateralspinalanesthesiaversusepiduralanesthesiabelowthet10sensorylevelinunilateralsurgeriesadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT alipourabbas comparisonofhemodynamicchangesinunilateralspinalanesthesiaversusepiduralanesthesiabelowthet10sensorylevelinunilateralsurgeriesadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT motevallishima comparisonofhemodynamicchangesinunilateralspinalanesthesiaversusepiduralanesthesiabelowthet10sensorylevelinunilateralsurgeriesadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT baradariafshingholipour comparisonofhemodynamicchangesinunilateralspinalanesthesiaversusepiduralanesthesiabelowthet10sensorylevelinunilateralsurgeriesadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial