Cargando…
Comparing Hemodynamic Responses to Diazepam, Propofol and Etomidate During Anesthesia Induction in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: a Double-blind, Randomized Clinical Trial
BACKGROUND: Anesthesia induction is often accompanied by a period of hemodynamic instability, which could be deleterious in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and left ventricular dysfunction undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the he...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5585810/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28974833 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2017.71.198-203 |
_version_ | 1783261698874933248 |
---|---|
author | Soleimani, Aria Heidari, Neda Habibi, Mohammad Reza Kiabi, Farshad Hasanzadeh Khademloo, Mohammad Zeydi, Amir Emami Sohrabi, Fatemeh Bozorg |
author_facet | Soleimani, Aria Heidari, Neda Habibi, Mohammad Reza Kiabi, Farshad Hasanzadeh Khademloo, Mohammad Zeydi, Amir Emami Sohrabi, Fatemeh Bozorg |
author_sort | Soleimani, Aria |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Anesthesia induction is often accompanied by a period of hemodynamic instability, which could be deleterious in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and left ventricular dysfunction undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the hemodynamic responses to propofol, etomidate, and diazepam following anesthesia induction, laryngoscopy and intubation in CABG surgery patients with low ejection fraction (EF). METHODS: A double-blind randomized, clinical study was performed on 150 patients with CAD and left ventricular dysfunction (EF≤35%) scheduled for elective CABG surgery with Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Patients were randomly allocated to three groups A, B, and C. These patients received propofol, etomidate or diazepam at induction of anesthesia, respectively. Hemodynamic variables (systolic and diastolic blood pressure [SBP, DBP], mean arterial pressure [MAP] and heart rate [HR]) were measured and recorded at baseline, immediately before laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation and one and three minutes after intubation. RESULT: One minute after induction and before laryngoscopy, there was a statistically significant decrease from the baseline in SBP, DBP and MAP in all three groups, but these variables in each hemodynamic parameters in diazepam group were less than other two groups (p<0.001). Moreover, the mean HR decreased in patients receiving propofol and etomidate one minute after induction and before laryngoscopy, but did not decreased in the diazepam group (p=0.005). CONCLUSION: The present study showed that in patients undergoing CABG surgery with low EF, diazepam is more favorable in terms of hemodynamic stability compared to propofol and etomidate and this drug can be used safely for induction of anesthesia in patients with impaired ventricular function. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5585810 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55858102017-10-03 Comparing Hemodynamic Responses to Diazepam, Propofol and Etomidate During Anesthesia Induction in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: a Double-blind, Randomized Clinical Trial Soleimani, Aria Heidari, Neda Habibi, Mohammad Reza Kiabi, Farshad Hasanzadeh Khademloo, Mohammad Zeydi, Amir Emami Sohrabi, Fatemeh Bozorg Med Arch Original Paper BACKGROUND: Anesthesia induction is often accompanied by a period of hemodynamic instability, which could be deleterious in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and left ventricular dysfunction undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the hemodynamic responses to propofol, etomidate, and diazepam following anesthesia induction, laryngoscopy and intubation in CABG surgery patients with low ejection fraction (EF). METHODS: A double-blind randomized, clinical study was performed on 150 patients with CAD and left ventricular dysfunction (EF≤35%) scheduled for elective CABG surgery with Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Patients were randomly allocated to three groups A, B, and C. These patients received propofol, etomidate or diazepam at induction of anesthesia, respectively. Hemodynamic variables (systolic and diastolic blood pressure [SBP, DBP], mean arterial pressure [MAP] and heart rate [HR]) were measured and recorded at baseline, immediately before laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation and one and three minutes after intubation. RESULT: One minute after induction and before laryngoscopy, there was a statistically significant decrease from the baseline in SBP, DBP and MAP in all three groups, but these variables in each hemodynamic parameters in diazepam group were less than other two groups (p<0.001). Moreover, the mean HR decreased in patients receiving propofol and etomidate one minute after induction and before laryngoscopy, but did not decreased in the diazepam group (p=0.005). CONCLUSION: The present study showed that in patients undergoing CABG surgery with low EF, diazepam is more favorable in terms of hemodynamic stability compared to propofol and etomidate and this drug can be used safely for induction of anesthesia in patients with impaired ventricular function. AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2017-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5585810/ /pubmed/28974833 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2017.71.198-203 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Aria Soleimani, Neda Heidari, Mohammad Reza Habibi, Farshad Hasanzadeh Kiabi, Mohammad Khademloo, Amir Emami Zeydi, Fatemeh Bozorg Sohrabi http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Soleimani, Aria Heidari, Neda Habibi, Mohammad Reza Kiabi, Farshad Hasanzadeh Khademloo, Mohammad Zeydi, Amir Emami Sohrabi, Fatemeh Bozorg Comparing Hemodynamic Responses to Diazepam, Propofol and Etomidate During Anesthesia Induction in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: a Double-blind, Randomized Clinical Trial |
title | Comparing Hemodynamic Responses to Diazepam, Propofol and Etomidate During Anesthesia Induction in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: a Double-blind, Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full | Comparing Hemodynamic Responses to Diazepam, Propofol and Etomidate During Anesthesia Induction in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: a Double-blind, Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | Comparing Hemodynamic Responses to Diazepam, Propofol and Etomidate During Anesthesia Induction in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: a Double-blind, Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing Hemodynamic Responses to Diazepam, Propofol and Etomidate During Anesthesia Induction in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: a Double-blind, Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_short | Comparing Hemodynamic Responses to Diazepam, Propofol and Etomidate During Anesthesia Induction in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: a Double-blind, Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_sort | comparing hemodynamic responses to diazepam, propofol and etomidate during anesthesia induction in patients with left ventricular dysfunction undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5585810/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28974833 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2017.71.198-203 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT soleimaniaria comparinghemodynamicresponsestodiazepampropofolandetomidateduringanesthesiainductioninpatientswithleftventriculardysfunctionundergoingcoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgeryadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial AT heidarineda comparinghemodynamicresponsestodiazepampropofolandetomidateduringanesthesiainductioninpatientswithleftventriculardysfunctionundergoingcoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgeryadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial AT habibimohammadreza comparinghemodynamicresponsestodiazepampropofolandetomidateduringanesthesiainductioninpatientswithleftventriculardysfunctionundergoingcoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgeryadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial AT kiabifarshadhasanzadeh comparinghemodynamicresponsestodiazepampropofolandetomidateduringanesthesiainductioninpatientswithleftventriculardysfunctionundergoingcoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgeryadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial AT khademloomohammad comparinghemodynamicresponsestodiazepampropofolandetomidateduringanesthesiainductioninpatientswithleftventriculardysfunctionundergoingcoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgeryadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial AT zeydiamiremami comparinghemodynamicresponsestodiazepampropofolandetomidateduringanesthesiainductioninpatientswithleftventriculardysfunctionundergoingcoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgeryadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial AT sohrabifatemehbozorg comparinghemodynamicresponsestodiazepampropofolandetomidateduringanesthesiainductioninpatientswithleftventriculardysfunctionundergoingcoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgeryadoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrial |