Cargando…

Comparison of Space Glucose Control and Routine Glucose Management Protocol for Glycemic Control in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Study

BACKGROUND: The Space Glucose Control (SGC) system is a computer-assisted device combining infusion pumps with the enhanced Model Predictive Control algorithm to achieve the target blood glucose (BG) level safely. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of glycemic contro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Biao, Jiang, Wei, Wang, Chun-Yao, Weng, Li, Hu, Xiao-Yun, Peng, Jin-Min, Du, Bin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5586171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28836546
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.213422
_version_ 1783261761547272192
author Xu, Biao
Jiang, Wei
Wang, Chun-Yao
Weng, Li
Hu, Xiao-Yun
Peng, Jin-Min
Du, Bin
author_facet Xu, Biao
Jiang, Wei
Wang, Chun-Yao
Weng, Li
Hu, Xiao-Yun
Peng, Jin-Min
Du, Bin
author_sort Xu, Biao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Space Glucose Control (SGC) system is a computer-assisted device combining infusion pumps with the enhanced Model Predictive Control algorithm to achieve the target blood glucose (BG) level safely. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of glycemic control by SGC with customized BG target range of 5.8–8.9 mmol/L in the critically ill patients. METHODS: It is a randomized controlled trial of seventy critically ill patients with mechanical ventilation and hyperglycemia (BG ≥ 9.0 mmol/L). Thirty-six patients in the SGC group and 34 in the routine glucose management group were observed for three consecutive days. Target BG for both groups was 5.8–8.9 mmol/L. The primary outcome was the percentage time in the target range. RESULTS: The percentage time within BG target range in the SGC group (69 ± 15%) was significantly higher than in the routine management group (52 ± 24%; P < 0.01). No measurement was ≤2.2 mmol/L, and there was only one episode of hypoglycemia (2.3–3.3 mmol/L) in each group. The average BG was significantly lower in the SGC group (7.8 ± 0.7 mmol/L) than in the routine management group (9.1 ± 1.6 mmol/L, P < 0.001). Target BG level was reached earlier in the SGC group than routine management group (2.5 ± 2.9 vs. 12.1 ± 15.3 h, P = 0.001). However, the SGC group performed worse for daily insulin requirement (59.8 ± 39.3 vs. 28.4 ± 36.7 U, P = 0.001) and sampling interval (2.0 ± 0.5 vs. 3.7 ± 0.5 h, P < 0.001) than the routine management group did. Multiple linear regression showed that the intervention group remained a significant individual predictor (P < 0.001) of the percentage time in target range. CONCLUSIONS: The SGC system, with a BG target of 5.8–8.9 mmol/L, resulted in effective and reliable glycemic control with few hypoglycemic episodes in critically ill patients with mechanical ventilation and hyperglycemia. However, the workload was increased. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT 02491346; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02491346?term=NCT02491346&cond=Hyperglycemia&cntry1=ES%3ACN&rank=1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5586171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55861712017-09-13 Comparison of Space Glucose Control and Routine Glucose Management Protocol for Glycemic Control in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Study Xu, Biao Jiang, Wei Wang, Chun-Yao Weng, Li Hu, Xiao-Yun Peng, Jin-Min Du, Bin Chin Med J (Engl) Original Article BACKGROUND: The Space Glucose Control (SGC) system is a computer-assisted device combining infusion pumps with the enhanced Model Predictive Control algorithm to achieve the target blood glucose (BG) level safely. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of glycemic control by SGC with customized BG target range of 5.8–8.9 mmol/L in the critically ill patients. METHODS: It is a randomized controlled trial of seventy critically ill patients with mechanical ventilation and hyperglycemia (BG ≥ 9.0 mmol/L). Thirty-six patients in the SGC group and 34 in the routine glucose management group were observed for three consecutive days. Target BG for both groups was 5.8–8.9 mmol/L. The primary outcome was the percentage time in the target range. RESULTS: The percentage time within BG target range in the SGC group (69 ± 15%) was significantly higher than in the routine management group (52 ± 24%; P < 0.01). No measurement was ≤2.2 mmol/L, and there was only one episode of hypoglycemia (2.3–3.3 mmol/L) in each group. The average BG was significantly lower in the SGC group (7.8 ± 0.7 mmol/L) than in the routine management group (9.1 ± 1.6 mmol/L, P < 0.001). Target BG level was reached earlier in the SGC group than routine management group (2.5 ± 2.9 vs. 12.1 ± 15.3 h, P = 0.001). However, the SGC group performed worse for daily insulin requirement (59.8 ± 39.3 vs. 28.4 ± 36.7 U, P = 0.001) and sampling interval (2.0 ± 0.5 vs. 3.7 ± 0.5 h, P < 0.001) than the routine management group did. Multiple linear regression showed that the intervention group remained a significant individual predictor (P < 0.001) of the percentage time in target range. CONCLUSIONS: The SGC system, with a BG target of 5.8–8.9 mmol/L, resulted in effective and reliable glycemic control with few hypoglycemic episodes in critically ill patients with mechanical ventilation and hyperglycemia. However, the workload was increased. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT 02491346; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02491346?term=NCT02491346&cond=Hyperglycemia&cntry1=ES%3ACN&rank=1. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5586171/ /pubmed/28836546 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.213422 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Chinese Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Xu, Biao
Jiang, Wei
Wang, Chun-Yao
Weng, Li
Hu, Xiao-Yun
Peng, Jin-Min
Du, Bin
Comparison of Space Glucose Control and Routine Glucose Management Protocol for Glycemic Control in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Study
title Comparison of Space Glucose Control and Routine Glucose Management Protocol for Glycemic Control in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Study
title_full Comparison of Space Glucose Control and Routine Glucose Management Protocol for Glycemic Control in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Space Glucose Control and Routine Glucose Management Protocol for Glycemic Control in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Space Glucose Control and Routine Glucose Management Protocol for Glycemic Control in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Study
title_short Comparison of Space Glucose Control and Routine Glucose Management Protocol for Glycemic Control in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Study
title_sort comparison of space glucose control and routine glucose management protocol for glycemic control in critically ill patients: a prospective, randomized clinical study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5586171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28836546
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.213422
work_keys_str_mv AT xubiao comparisonofspaceglucosecontrolandroutineglucosemanagementprotocolforglycemiccontrolincriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedclinicalstudy
AT jiangwei comparisonofspaceglucosecontrolandroutineglucosemanagementprotocolforglycemiccontrolincriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedclinicalstudy
AT wangchunyao comparisonofspaceglucosecontrolandroutineglucosemanagementprotocolforglycemiccontrolincriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedclinicalstudy
AT wengli comparisonofspaceglucosecontrolandroutineglucosemanagementprotocolforglycemiccontrolincriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedclinicalstudy
AT huxiaoyun comparisonofspaceglucosecontrolandroutineglucosemanagementprotocolforglycemiccontrolincriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedclinicalstudy
AT pengjinmin comparisonofspaceglucosecontrolandroutineglucosemanagementprotocolforglycemiccontrolincriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedclinicalstudy
AT dubin comparisonofspaceglucosecontrolandroutineglucosemanagementprotocolforglycemiccontrolincriticallyillpatientsaprospectiverandomizedclinicalstudy