Cargando…

Automated Photoreceptor Cell Identification on Nonconfocal Adaptive Optics Images Using Multiscale Circular Voting

PURPOSE: Adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO) has enabled quantification of the photoreceptor mosaic in the living human eye using metrics such as cell density and average spacing. These rely on the identification of individual cells. Here, we demonstrate a novel approach for comput...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Jianfei, Jung, HaeWon, Dubra, Alfredo, Tam, Johnny
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5586244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28873173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.16-21003
_version_ 1783261777001185280
author Liu, Jianfei
Jung, HaeWon
Dubra, Alfredo
Tam, Johnny
author_facet Liu, Jianfei
Jung, HaeWon
Dubra, Alfredo
Tam, Johnny
author_sort Liu, Jianfei
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO) has enabled quantification of the photoreceptor mosaic in the living human eye using metrics such as cell density and average spacing. These rely on the identification of individual cells. Here, we demonstrate a novel approach for computer-aided identification of cone photoreceptors on nonconfocal split detection AOSLO images. METHODS: Algorithms for identification of cone photoreceptors were developed, based on multiscale circular voting (MSCV) in combination with a priori knowledge that split detection images resemble Nomarski differential interference contrast images, in which dark and bright regions are present on the two sides of each cell. The proposed algorithm locates dark and bright region pairs, iteratively refining the identification across multiple scales. Identification accuracy was assessed in data from 10 subjects by comparing automated identifications with manual labeling, followed by computation of density and spacing metrics for comparison to histology and published data. RESULTS: There was good agreement between manual and automated cone identifications with overall recall, precision, and F1 score of 92.9%, 90.8%, and 91.8%, respectively. On average, computed density and spacing values using automated identification were within 10.7% and 11.2% of the expected histology values across eccentricities ranging from 0.5 to 6.2 mm. There was no statistically significant difference between MSCV-based and histology-based density measurements (P = 0.96, Kolmogorov-Smirnov 2-sample test). CONCLUSIONS: MSCV can accurately detect cone photoreceptors on split detection images across a range of eccentricities, enabling quick, objective estimation of photoreceptor mosaic metrics, which will be important for future clinical trials utilizing adaptive optics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5586244
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55862442017-09-12 Automated Photoreceptor Cell Identification on Nonconfocal Adaptive Optics Images Using Multiscale Circular Voting Liu, Jianfei Jung, HaeWon Dubra, Alfredo Tam, Johnny Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Multidisciplinary Ophthalmic Imaging PURPOSE: Adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO) has enabled quantification of the photoreceptor mosaic in the living human eye using metrics such as cell density and average spacing. These rely on the identification of individual cells. Here, we demonstrate a novel approach for computer-aided identification of cone photoreceptors on nonconfocal split detection AOSLO images. METHODS: Algorithms for identification of cone photoreceptors were developed, based on multiscale circular voting (MSCV) in combination with a priori knowledge that split detection images resemble Nomarski differential interference contrast images, in which dark and bright regions are present on the two sides of each cell. The proposed algorithm locates dark and bright region pairs, iteratively refining the identification across multiple scales. Identification accuracy was assessed in data from 10 subjects by comparing automated identifications with manual labeling, followed by computation of density and spacing metrics for comparison to histology and published data. RESULTS: There was good agreement between manual and automated cone identifications with overall recall, precision, and F1 score of 92.9%, 90.8%, and 91.8%, respectively. On average, computed density and spacing values using automated identification were within 10.7% and 11.2% of the expected histology values across eccentricities ranging from 0.5 to 6.2 mm. There was no statistically significant difference between MSCV-based and histology-based density measurements (P = 0.96, Kolmogorov-Smirnov 2-sample test). CONCLUSIONS: MSCV can accurately detect cone photoreceptors on split detection images across a range of eccentricities, enabling quick, objective estimation of photoreceptor mosaic metrics, which will be important for future clinical trials utilizing adaptive optics. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2017-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5586244/ /pubmed/28873173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.16-21003 Text en Copyright 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Multidisciplinary Ophthalmic Imaging
Liu, Jianfei
Jung, HaeWon
Dubra, Alfredo
Tam, Johnny
Automated Photoreceptor Cell Identification on Nonconfocal Adaptive Optics Images Using Multiscale Circular Voting
title Automated Photoreceptor Cell Identification on Nonconfocal Adaptive Optics Images Using Multiscale Circular Voting
title_full Automated Photoreceptor Cell Identification on Nonconfocal Adaptive Optics Images Using Multiscale Circular Voting
title_fullStr Automated Photoreceptor Cell Identification on Nonconfocal Adaptive Optics Images Using Multiscale Circular Voting
title_full_unstemmed Automated Photoreceptor Cell Identification on Nonconfocal Adaptive Optics Images Using Multiscale Circular Voting
title_short Automated Photoreceptor Cell Identification on Nonconfocal Adaptive Optics Images Using Multiscale Circular Voting
title_sort automated photoreceptor cell identification on nonconfocal adaptive optics images using multiscale circular voting
topic Multidisciplinary Ophthalmic Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5586244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28873173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.16-21003
work_keys_str_mv AT liujianfei automatedphotoreceptorcellidentificationonnonconfocaladaptiveopticsimagesusingmultiscalecircularvoting
AT junghaewon automatedphotoreceptorcellidentificationonnonconfocaladaptiveopticsimagesusingmultiscalecircularvoting
AT dubraalfredo automatedphotoreceptorcellidentificationonnonconfocaladaptiveopticsimagesusingmultiscalecircularvoting
AT tamjohnny automatedphotoreceptorcellidentificationonnonconfocaladaptiveopticsimagesusingmultiscalecircularvoting