Cargando…

Comparison of Anatomic and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Alternative Initial Noninvasive Testing Strategies for the Diagnosis of Stable Coronary Artery Disease

BACKGROUND: The optimal initial noninvasive diagnostic testing strategy for stable coronary artery disease (CAD) is unknown. Although American guidelines recommend an exercise stress test as the first‐line test, European guidelines suggest that stress imaging (myocardial perfusion imaging or stress...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roifman, Idan, Wijeysundera, Harindra C., Austin, Peter C., Rezai, Mohammad R., Wright, Graham A., Tu, Jack V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5586282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28729409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.005462
_version_ 1783261785794543616
author Roifman, Idan
Wijeysundera, Harindra C.
Austin, Peter C.
Rezai, Mohammad R.
Wright, Graham A.
Tu, Jack V.
author_facet Roifman, Idan
Wijeysundera, Harindra C.
Austin, Peter C.
Rezai, Mohammad R.
Wright, Graham A.
Tu, Jack V.
author_sort Roifman, Idan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The optimal initial noninvasive diagnostic testing strategy for stable coronary artery disease (CAD) is unknown. Although American guidelines recommend an exercise stress test as the first‐line test, European guidelines suggest that stress imaging (myocardial perfusion imaging or stress echocardiography) or coronary computed tomography angiography may be preferable. Understanding the relationship between the initial strategy and downstream yield of obstructive CAD and major adverse cardiac events may provide insight as to the optimal strategy. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a population‐based retrospective cohort study of adults in Ontario, Canada, using health administrative and clinical data. The relationship between the initial testing strategy and obstructive CAD on invasive angiography was examined. Patients were then followed from their angiogram onward to determine whether they developed a composite end point of major adverse cardiac events. After adjusting for covariates, patients with initial myocardial perfusion imaging (odds ratio: 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.85, 1.00), coronary computed tomography angiography (odds ratio: 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.91, 2.49), or stress echo (odds ratio: 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.84, 1.08) did not a have significantly different yield of obstructive CAD compared with those with an initial exercise stress test. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in downstream major adverse cardiac events after invasive angiography among the 4 initial testing strategies after adjusting for clinically relevant covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found no evidence to suggest significant differences in either yield of obstructive CAD or downstream major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing an initial noninvasive testing strategy with stress or anatomical imaging compared with those undergoing an initial exercise stress test.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5586282
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55862822017-09-11 Comparison of Anatomic and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Alternative Initial Noninvasive Testing Strategies for the Diagnosis of Stable Coronary Artery Disease Roifman, Idan Wijeysundera, Harindra C. Austin, Peter C. Rezai, Mohammad R. Wright, Graham A. Tu, Jack V. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: The optimal initial noninvasive diagnostic testing strategy for stable coronary artery disease (CAD) is unknown. Although American guidelines recommend an exercise stress test as the first‐line test, European guidelines suggest that stress imaging (myocardial perfusion imaging or stress echocardiography) or coronary computed tomography angiography may be preferable. Understanding the relationship between the initial strategy and downstream yield of obstructive CAD and major adverse cardiac events may provide insight as to the optimal strategy. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a population‐based retrospective cohort study of adults in Ontario, Canada, using health administrative and clinical data. The relationship between the initial testing strategy and obstructive CAD on invasive angiography was examined. Patients were then followed from their angiogram onward to determine whether they developed a composite end point of major adverse cardiac events. After adjusting for covariates, patients with initial myocardial perfusion imaging (odds ratio: 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.85, 1.00), coronary computed tomography angiography (odds ratio: 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.91, 2.49), or stress echo (odds ratio: 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.84, 1.08) did not a have significantly different yield of obstructive CAD compared with those with an initial exercise stress test. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in downstream major adverse cardiac events after invasive angiography among the 4 initial testing strategies after adjusting for clinically relevant covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found no evidence to suggest significant differences in either yield of obstructive CAD or downstream major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing an initial noninvasive testing strategy with stress or anatomical imaging compared with those undergoing an initial exercise stress test. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5586282/ /pubmed/28729409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.005462 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Roifman, Idan
Wijeysundera, Harindra C.
Austin, Peter C.
Rezai, Mohammad R.
Wright, Graham A.
Tu, Jack V.
Comparison of Anatomic and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Alternative Initial Noninvasive Testing Strategies for the Diagnosis of Stable Coronary Artery Disease
title Comparison of Anatomic and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Alternative Initial Noninvasive Testing Strategies for the Diagnosis of Stable Coronary Artery Disease
title_full Comparison of Anatomic and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Alternative Initial Noninvasive Testing Strategies for the Diagnosis of Stable Coronary Artery Disease
title_fullStr Comparison of Anatomic and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Alternative Initial Noninvasive Testing Strategies for the Diagnosis of Stable Coronary Artery Disease
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Anatomic and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Alternative Initial Noninvasive Testing Strategies for the Diagnosis of Stable Coronary Artery Disease
title_short Comparison of Anatomic and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Alternative Initial Noninvasive Testing Strategies for the Diagnosis of Stable Coronary Artery Disease
title_sort comparison of anatomic and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing alternative initial noninvasive testing strategies for the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5586282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28729409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.005462
work_keys_str_mv AT roifmanidan comparisonofanatomicandclinicaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingalternativeinitialnoninvasivetestingstrategiesforthediagnosisofstablecoronaryarterydisease
AT wijeysunderaharindrac comparisonofanatomicandclinicaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingalternativeinitialnoninvasivetestingstrategiesforthediagnosisofstablecoronaryarterydisease
AT austinpeterc comparisonofanatomicandclinicaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingalternativeinitialnoninvasivetestingstrategiesforthediagnosisofstablecoronaryarterydisease
AT rezaimohammadr comparisonofanatomicandclinicaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingalternativeinitialnoninvasivetestingstrategiesforthediagnosisofstablecoronaryarterydisease
AT wrightgrahama comparisonofanatomicandclinicaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingalternativeinitialnoninvasivetestingstrategiesforthediagnosisofstablecoronaryarterydisease
AT tujackv comparisonofanatomicandclinicaloutcomesinpatientsundergoingalternativeinitialnoninvasivetestingstrategiesforthediagnosisofstablecoronaryarterydisease