Cargando…

Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Computed Tomography Angiography–Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Testing in Stable Patients With Intermediate‐Range Coronary Lesions: Influence on Downstream Diagnostic Workflows and Invasive Angiography Findings

BACKGROUND: Data on the clinical utility of coronary computed tomography angiography–derived fractional flow reserve (FFR(CT)) are sparse. In patients with intermediate (40–70%) coronary stenosis determined by coronary computed tomography angiography, we investigated the association of replacing sta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nørgaard, Bjarne L., Gormsen, Lars C., Bøtker, Hans Erik, Parner, Erik, Nielsen, Lene H., Mathiassen, Ole N., Grove, Erik L., Øvrehus, Kristian A., Gaur, Sara, Leipsic, Jonathon, Pedersen, Kamilla, Terkelsen, Christian J., Christiansen, Evald H., Kaltoft, Anne, Mæng, Michael, Kristensen, Steen D., Krusell, Lars R., Lassen, Jens F., Jensen, Jesper M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5586421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28862968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.005587
_version_ 1783261811694370816
author Nørgaard, Bjarne L.
Gormsen, Lars C.
Bøtker, Hans Erik
Parner, Erik
Nielsen, Lene H.
Mathiassen, Ole N.
Grove, Erik L.
Øvrehus, Kristian A.
Gaur, Sara
Leipsic, Jonathon
Pedersen, Kamilla
Terkelsen, Christian J.
Christiansen, Evald H.
Kaltoft, Anne
Mæng, Michael
Kristensen, Steen D.
Krusell, Lars R.
Lassen, Jens F.
Jensen, Jesper M.
author_facet Nørgaard, Bjarne L.
Gormsen, Lars C.
Bøtker, Hans Erik
Parner, Erik
Nielsen, Lene H.
Mathiassen, Ole N.
Grove, Erik L.
Øvrehus, Kristian A.
Gaur, Sara
Leipsic, Jonathon
Pedersen, Kamilla
Terkelsen, Christian J.
Christiansen, Evald H.
Kaltoft, Anne
Mæng, Michael
Kristensen, Steen D.
Krusell, Lars R.
Lassen, Jens F.
Jensen, Jesper M.
author_sort Nørgaard, Bjarne L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Data on the clinical utility of coronary computed tomography angiography–derived fractional flow reserve (FFR(CT)) are sparse. In patients with intermediate (40–70%) coronary stenosis determined by coronary computed tomography angiography, we investigated the association of replacing standard myocardial perfusion imaging with FFR(CT) testing with downstream utilization of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and the diagnostic yield of ICA (rate of no obstructive disease, and rate of revascularization). METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a single‐center observational study of symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease referred to coronary computed tomography angiography between 2013 and 2015. Patients were divided into 3 historical groups based on the adjunctive functional testing approach: myocardial perfusion imaging (n=1332) or FFR(CT) “implementation” (n=800) or “clinical use” (n=1391). Propensity score matching was used to estimate the average period effect on outcomes. Patients in the FFR(CT) clinical use group versus the myocardial perfusion imaging group were older and had higher pretest probability of obstructive disease. After adjusting for baseline risk characteristics, there was a reduction in downstream ICA utilization (absolute risk difference: −4.2; 95% CI, −6.9 to −1.6; P=0.002). In patients referred to ICA, findings of no obstructive coronary artery disease decreased (−12.8%; 95% CI, −22.2 to −3.4; P=0.008) and rate of coronary revascularization increased (14.1%; 95% CI, 3.3–24.9; P=0.01), as did availability of functional information for guidance of revascularization (27.8%; 95% CI, 11.3–44.4; P<0.001) after clinical adoption of FFR(CT). CONCLUSIONS: Replacing adjunctive myocardial perfusion imaging with FFR(CT) testing for functional assessment of intermediate stenosis determined by coronary computed tomography angiography in stable coronary artery disease was associated with less ICA utilization, and a higher ICA diagnostic yield. The findings in this observational study needs confirmation in prospective, randomized trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5586421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55864212017-09-11 Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Computed Tomography Angiography–Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Testing in Stable Patients With Intermediate‐Range Coronary Lesions: Influence on Downstream Diagnostic Workflows and Invasive Angiography Findings Nørgaard, Bjarne L. Gormsen, Lars C. Bøtker, Hans Erik Parner, Erik Nielsen, Lene H. Mathiassen, Ole N. Grove, Erik L. Øvrehus, Kristian A. Gaur, Sara Leipsic, Jonathon Pedersen, Kamilla Terkelsen, Christian J. Christiansen, Evald H. Kaltoft, Anne Mæng, Michael Kristensen, Steen D. Krusell, Lars R. Lassen, Jens F. Jensen, Jesper M. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Data on the clinical utility of coronary computed tomography angiography–derived fractional flow reserve (FFR(CT)) are sparse. In patients with intermediate (40–70%) coronary stenosis determined by coronary computed tomography angiography, we investigated the association of replacing standard myocardial perfusion imaging with FFR(CT) testing with downstream utilization of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and the diagnostic yield of ICA (rate of no obstructive disease, and rate of revascularization). METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a single‐center observational study of symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease referred to coronary computed tomography angiography between 2013 and 2015. Patients were divided into 3 historical groups based on the adjunctive functional testing approach: myocardial perfusion imaging (n=1332) or FFR(CT) “implementation” (n=800) or “clinical use” (n=1391). Propensity score matching was used to estimate the average period effect on outcomes. Patients in the FFR(CT) clinical use group versus the myocardial perfusion imaging group were older and had higher pretest probability of obstructive disease. After adjusting for baseline risk characteristics, there was a reduction in downstream ICA utilization (absolute risk difference: −4.2; 95% CI, −6.9 to −1.6; P=0.002). In patients referred to ICA, findings of no obstructive coronary artery disease decreased (−12.8%; 95% CI, −22.2 to −3.4; P=0.008) and rate of coronary revascularization increased (14.1%; 95% CI, 3.3–24.9; P=0.01), as did availability of functional information for guidance of revascularization (27.8%; 95% CI, 11.3–44.4; P<0.001) after clinical adoption of FFR(CT). CONCLUSIONS: Replacing adjunctive myocardial perfusion imaging with FFR(CT) testing for functional assessment of intermediate stenosis determined by coronary computed tomography angiography in stable coronary artery disease was associated with less ICA utilization, and a higher ICA diagnostic yield. The findings in this observational study needs confirmation in prospective, randomized trials. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5586421/ /pubmed/28862968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.005587 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Nørgaard, Bjarne L.
Gormsen, Lars C.
Bøtker, Hans Erik
Parner, Erik
Nielsen, Lene H.
Mathiassen, Ole N.
Grove, Erik L.
Øvrehus, Kristian A.
Gaur, Sara
Leipsic, Jonathon
Pedersen, Kamilla
Terkelsen, Christian J.
Christiansen, Evald H.
Kaltoft, Anne
Mæng, Michael
Kristensen, Steen D.
Krusell, Lars R.
Lassen, Jens F.
Jensen, Jesper M.
Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Computed Tomography Angiography–Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Testing in Stable Patients With Intermediate‐Range Coronary Lesions: Influence on Downstream Diagnostic Workflows and Invasive Angiography Findings
title Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Computed Tomography Angiography–Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Testing in Stable Patients With Intermediate‐Range Coronary Lesions: Influence on Downstream Diagnostic Workflows and Invasive Angiography Findings
title_full Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Computed Tomography Angiography–Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Testing in Stable Patients With Intermediate‐Range Coronary Lesions: Influence on Downstream Diagnostic Workflows and Invasive Angiography Findings
title_fullStr Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Computed Tomography Angiography–Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Testing in Stable Patients With Intermediate‐Range Coronary Lesions: Influence on Downstream Diagnostic Workflows and Invasive Angiography Findings
title_full_unstemmed Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Computed Tomography Angiography–Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Testing in Stable Patients With Intermediate‐Range Coronary Lesions: Influence on Downstream Diagnostic Workflows and Invasive Angiography Findings
title_short Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Computed Tomography Angiography–Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Testing in Stable Patients With Intermediate‐Range Coronary Lesions: Influence on Downstream Diagnostic Workflows and Invasive Angiography Findings
title_sort myocardial perfusion imaging versus computed tomography angiography–derived fractional flow reserve testing in stable patients with intermediate‐range coronary lesions: influence on downstream diagnostic workflows and invasive angiography findings
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5586421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28862968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.005587
work_keys_str_mv AT nørgaardbjarnel myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings
AT gormsenlarsc myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings
AT bøtkerhanserik myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings
AT parnererik myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings
AT nielsenleneh myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings
AT mathiassenolen myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings
AT groveerikl myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings
AT øvrehuskristiana myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings
AT gaursara myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings
AT leipsicjonathon myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings
AT pedersenkamilla myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings
AT terkelsenchristianj myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings
AT christiansenevaldh myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings
AT kaltoftanne myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings
AT mængmichael myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings
AT kristensensteend myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings
AT kruselllarsr myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings
AT lassenjensf myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings
AT jensenjesperm myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings