Cargando…
Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Computed Tomography Angiography–Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Testing in Stable Patients With Intermediate‐Range Coronary Lesions: Influence on Downstream Diagnostic Workflows and Invasive Angiography Findings
BACKGROUND: Data on the clinical utility of coronary computed tomography angiography–derived fractional flow reserve (FFR(CT)) are sparse. In patients with intermediate (40–70%) coronary stenosis determined by coronary computed tomography angiography, we investigated the association of replacing sta...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5586421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28862968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.005587 |
_version_ | 1783261811694370816 |
---|---|
author | Nørgaard, Bjarne L. Gormsen, Lars C. Bøtker, Hans Erik Parner, Erik Nielsen, Lene H. Mathiassen, Ole N. Grove, Erik L. Øvrehus, Kristian A. Gaur, Sara Leipsic, Jonathon Pedersen, Kamilla Terkelsen, Christian J. Christiansen, Evald H. Kaltoft, Anne Mæng, Michael Kristensen, Steen D. Krusell, Lars R. Lassen, Jens F. Jensen, Jesper M. |
author_facet | Nørgaard, Bjarne L. Gormsen, Lars C. Bøtker, Hans Erik Parner, Erik Nielsen, Lene H. Mathiassen, Ole N. Grove, Erik L. Øvrehus, Kristian A. Gaur, Sara Leipsic, Jonathon Pedersen, Kamilla Terkelsen, Christian J. Christiansen, Evald H. Kaltoft, Anne Mæng, Michael Kristensen, Steen D. Krusell, Lars R. Lassen, Jens F. Jensen, Jesper M. |
author_sort | Nørgaard, Bjarne L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Data on the clinical utility of coronary computed tomography angiography–derived fractional flow reserve (FFR(CT)) are sparse. In patients with intermediate (40–70%) coronary stenosis determined by coronary computed tomography angiography, we investigated the association of replacing standard myocardial perfusion imaging with FFR(CT) testing with downstream utilization of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and the diagnostic yield of ICA (rate of no obstructive disease, and rate of revascularization). METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a single‐center observational study of symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease referred to coronary computed tomography angiography between 2013 and 2015. Patients were divided into 3 historical groups based on the adjunctive functional testing approach: myocardial perfusion imaging (n=1332) or FFR(CT) “implementation” (n=800) or “clinical use” (n=1391). Propensity score matching was used to estimate the average period effect on outcomes. Patients in the FFR(CT) clinical use group versus the myocardial perfusion imaging group were older and had higher pretest probability of obstructive disease. After adjusting for baseline risk characteristics, there was a reduction in downstream ICA utilization (absolute risk difference: −4.2; 95% CI, −6.9 to −1.6; P=0.002). In patients referred to ICA, findings of no obstructive coronary artery disease decreased (−12.8%; 95% CI, −22.2 to −3.4; P=0.008) and rate of coronary revascularization increased (14.1%; 95% CI, 3.3–24.9; P=0.01), as did availability of functional information for guidance of revascularization (27.8%; 95% CI, 11.3–44.4; P<0.001) after clinical adoption of FFR(CT). CONCLUSIONS: Replacing adjunctive myocardial perfusion imaging with FFR(CT) testing for functional assessment of intermediate stenosis determined by coronary computed tomography angiography in stable coronary artery disease was associated with less ICA utilization, and a higher ICA diagnostic yield. The findings in this observational study needs confirmation in prospective, randomized trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5586421 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55864212017-09-11 Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Computed Tomography Angiography–Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Testing in Stable Patients With Intermediate‐Range Coronary Lesions: Influence on Downstream Diagnostic Workflows and Invasive Angiography Findings Nørgaard, Bjarne L. Gormsen, Lars C. Bøtker, Hans Erik Parner, Erik Nielsen, Lene H. Mathiassen, Ole N. Grove, Erik L. Øvrehus, Kristian A. Gaur, Sara Leipsic, Jonathon Pedersen, Kamilla Terkelsen, Christian J. Christiansen, Evald H. Kaltoft, Anne Mæng, Michael Kristensen, Steen D. Krusell, Lars R. Lassen, Jens F. Jensen, Jesper M. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Data on the clinical utility of coronary computed tomography angiography–derived fractional flow reserve (FFR(CT)) are sparse. In patients with intermediate (40–70%) coronary stenosis determined by coronary computed tomography angiography, we investigated the association of replacing standard myocardial perfusion imaging with FFR(CT) testing with downstream utilization of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and the diagnostic yield of ICA (rate of no obstructive disease, and rate of revascularization). METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a single‐center observational study of symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease referred to coronary computed tomography angiography between 2013 and 2015. Patients were divided into 3 historical groups based on the adjunctive functional testing approach: myocardial perfusion imaging (n=1332) or FFR(CT) “implementation” (n=800) or “clinical use” (n=1391). Propensity score matching was used to estimate the average period effect on outcomes. Patients in the FFR(CT) clinical use group versus the myocardial perfusion imaging group were older and had higher pretest probability of obstructive disease. After adjusting for baseline risk characteristics, there was a reduction in downstream ICA utilization (absolute risk difference: −4.2; 95% CI, −6.9 to −1.6; P=0.002). In patients referred to ICA, findings of no obstructive coronary artery disease decreased (−12.8%; 95% CI, −22.2 to −3.4; P=0.008) and rate of coronary revascularization increased (14.1%; 95% CI, 3.3–24.9; P=0.01), as did availability of functional information for guidance of revascularization (27.8%; 95% CI, 11.3–44.4; P<0.001) after clinical adoption of FFR(CT). CONCLUSIONS: Replacing adjunctive myocardial perfusion imaging with FFR(CT) testing for functional assessment of intermediate stenosis determined by coronary computed tomography angiography in stable coronary artery disease was associated with less ICA utilization, and a higher ICA diagnostic yield. The findings in this observational study needs confirmation in prospective, randomized trials. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5586421/ /pubmed/28862968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.005587 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Nørgaard, Bjarne L. Gormsen, Lars C. Bøtker, Hans Erik Parner, Erik Nielsen, Lene H. Mathiassen, Ole N. Grove, Erik L. Øvrehus, Kristian A. Gaur, Sara Leipsic, Jonathon Pedersen, Kamilla Terkelsen, Christian J. Christiansen, Evald H. Kaltoft, Anne Mæng, Michael Kristensen, Steen D. Krusell, Lars R. Lassen, Jens F. Jensen, Jesper M. Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Computed Tomography Angiography–Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Testing in Stable Patients With Intermediate‐Range Coronary Lesions: Influence on Downstream Diagnostic Workflows and Invasive Angiography Findings |
title | Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Computed Tomography Angiography–Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Testing in Stable Patients With Intermediate‐Range Coronary Lesions: Influence on Downstream Diagnostic Workflows and Invasive Angiography Findings |
title_full | Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Computed Tomography Angiography–Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Testing in Stable Patients With Intermediate‐Range Coronary Lesions: Influence on Downstream Diagnostic Workflows and Invasive Angiography Findings |
title_fullStr | Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Computed Tomography Angiography–Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Testing in Stable Patients With Intermediate‐Range Coronary Lesions: Influence on Downstream Diagnostic Workflows and Invasive Angiography Findings |
title_full_unstemmed | Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Computed Tomography Angiography–Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Testing in Stable Patients With Intermediate‐Range Coronary Lesions: Influence on Downstream Diagnostic Workflows and Invasive Angiography Findings |
title_short | Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Computed Tomography Angiography–Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Testing in Stable Patients With Intermediate‐Range Coronary Lesions: Influence on Downstream Diagnostic Workflows and Invasive Angiography Findings |
title_sort | myocardial perfusion imaging versus computed tomography angiography–derived fractional flow reserve testing in stable patients with intermediate‐range coronary lesions: influence on downstream diagnostic workflows and invasive angiography findings |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5586421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28862968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.005587 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nørgaardbjarnel myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings AT gormsenlarsc myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings AT bøtkerhanserik myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings AT parnererik myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings AT nielsenleneh myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings AT mathiassenolen myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings AT groveerikl myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings AT øvrehuskristiana myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings AT gaursara myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings AT leipsicjonathon myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings AT pedersenkamilla myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings AT terkelsenchristianj myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings AT christiansenevaldh myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings AT kaltoftanne myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings AT mængmichael myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings AT kristensensteend myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings AT kruselllarsr myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings AT lassenjensf myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings AT jensenjesperm myocardialperfusionimagingversuscomputedtomographyangiographyderivedfractionalflowreservetestinginstablepatientswithintermediaterangecoronarylesionsinfluenceondownstreamdiagnosticworkflowsandinvasiveangiographyfindings |