Cargando…
The Impact of Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation on Healthcare Utilization and Costs: An Economic Analysis From the FIRE AND ICE Trial
BACKGROUND: This study sought to assess payer costs following cryoballoon or radiofrequency current (RFC) catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in the randomized FIRE AND ICE trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: A trial period analysis of healthcare costs evaluated the impact of ablation modali...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5586445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28751544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.006043 |
_version_ | 1783261817387089920 |
---|---|
author | Chun, K. R. Julian Brugada, Josep Elvan, Arif Gellér, Laszlo Busch, Matthias Barrera, Alberto Schilling, Richard J. Reynolds, Matthew R. Hokanson, Robert B. Holbrook, Reece Brown, Benedict Schlüter, Michael Kuck, Karl‐Heinz |
author_facet | Chun, K. R. Julian Brugada, Josep Elvan, Arif Gellér, Laszlo Busch, Matthias Barrera, Alberto Schilling, Richard J. Reynolds, Matthew R. Hokanson, Robert B. Holbrook, Reece Brown, Benedict Schlüter, Michael Kuck, Karl‐Heinz |
author_sort | Chun, K. R. Julian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study sought to assess payer costs following cryoballoon or radiofrequency current (RFC) catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in the randomized FIRE AND ICE trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: A trial period analysis of healthcare costs evaluated the impact of ablation modality (cryoballoon versus RFC) on differences in resource use and associated payer costs. Analyses were based on repeat interventions, rehospitalizations, and cardioversions during the trial, with unit costs based on 3 national healthcare systems (Germany [€], the United Kingdom [£], and the United States [[Formula: see text]]). Total payer costs were calculated by applying standard unit costs to hospital stays, using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision diagnoses and procedure codes that were mapped to country‐specific diagnosis‐related groups. Patients (N=750) randomized 1:1 to cryoballoon (n=374) or RFC (n=376) ablation were followed for a mean of 1.5 years. Resource use was lower in the cryoballoon than the RFC group (205 hospitalizations and/or interventions in 122 patients versus 268 events in 154 patients). The cost differences per patient in mean total payer costs during follow‐up were €640, £364, and [Formula: see text] 925 in favor of cryoballoon ablation (P=0.012, 0.013, and 0.016, respectively). This resulted in trial period total cost savings of €245 000, £140 000, and [Formula: see text] 355 000. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with RFC ablation, cryoballoon ablation was associated with a reduction in resource use and payer costs. In all 3 national healthcare systems analyzed, this reduction resulted in substantial trial period cost savings, primarily attributable to fewer repeat ablations and a reduction in cardiovascular rehospitalizations with cryoballoon ablation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT01490814. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5586445 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55864452017-09-11 The Impact of Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation on Healthcare Utilization and Costs: An Economic Analysis From the FIRE AND ICE Trial Chun, K. R. Julian Brugada, Josep Elvan, Arif Gellér, Laszlo Busch, Matthias Barrera, Alberto Schilling, Richard J. Reynolds, Matthew R. Hokanson, Robert B. Holbrook, Reece Brown, Benedict Schlüter, Michael Kuck, Karl‐Heinz J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: This study sought to assess payer costs following cryoballoon or radiofrequency current (RFC) catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in the randomized FIRE AND ICE trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: A trial period analysis of healthcare costs evaluated the impact of ablation modality (cryoballoon versus RFC) on differences in resource use and associated payer costs. Analyses were based on repeat interventions, rehospitalizations, and cardioversions during the trial, with unit costs based on 3 national healthcare systems (Germany [€], the United Kingdom [£], and the United States [[Formula: see text]]). Total payer costs were calculated by applying standard unit costs to hospital stays, using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision diagnoses and procedure codes that were mapped to country‐specific diagnosis‐related groups. Patients (N=750) randomized 1:1 to cryoballoon (n=374) or RFC (n=376) ablation were followed for a mean of 1.5 years. Resource use was lower in the cryoballoon than the RFC group (205 hospitalizations and/or interventions in 122 patients versus 268 events in 154 patients). The cost differences per patient in mean total payer costs during follow‐up were €640, £364, and [Formula: see text] 925 in favor of cryoballoon ablation (P=0.012, 0.013, and 0.016, respectively). This resulted in trial period total cost savings of €245 000, £140 000, and [Formula: see text] 355 000. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with RFC ablation, cryoballoon ablation was associated with a reduction in resource use and payer costs. In all 3 national healthcare systems analyzed, this reduction resulted in substantial trial period cost savings, primarily attributable to fewer repeat ablations and a reduction in cardiovascular rehospitalizations with cryoballoon ablation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT01490814. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5586445/ /pubmed/28751544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.006043 Text en © 2017 The Authors and Medtronic. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Chun, K. R. Julian Brugada, Josep Elvan, Arif Gellér, Laszlo Busch, Matthias Barrera, Alberto Schilling, Richard J. Reynolds, Matthew R. Hokanson, Robert B. Holbrook, Reece Brown, Benedict Schlüter, Michael Kuck, Karl‐Heinz The Impact of Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation on Healthcare Utilization and Costs: An Economic Analysis From the FIRE AND ICE Trial |
title | The Impact of Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation on Healthcare Utilization and Costs: An Economic Analysis From the FIRE AND ICE Trial |
title_full | The Impact of Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation on Healthcare Utilization and Costs: An Economic Analysis From the FIRE AND ICE Trial |
title_fullStr | The Impact of Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation on Healthcare Utilization and Costs: An Economic Analysis From the FIRE AND ICE Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation on Healthcare Utilization and Costs: An Economic Analysis From the FIRE AND ICE Trial |
title_short | The Impact of Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation on Healthcare Utilization and Costs: An Economic Analysis From the FIRE AND ICE Trial |
title_sort | impact of cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation on healthcare utilization and costs: an economic analysis from the fire and ice trial |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5586445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28751544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.006043 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chunkrjulian theimpactofcryoballoonversusradiofrequencyablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationonhealthcareutilizationandcostsaneconomicanalysisfromthefireandicetrial AT brugadajosep theimpactofcryoballoonversusradiofrequencyablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationonhealthcareutilizationandcostsaneconomicanalysisfromthefireandicetrial AT elvanarif theimpactofcryoballoonversusradiofrequencyablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationonhealthcareutilizationandcostsaneconomicanalysisfromthefireandicetrial AT gellerlaszlo theimpactofcryoballoonversusradiofrequencyablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationonhealthcareutilizationandcostsaneconomicanalysisfromthefireandicetrial AT buschmatthias theimpactofcryoballoonversusradiofrequencyablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationonhealthcareutilizationandcostsaneconomicanalysisfromthefireandicetrial AT barreraalberto theimpactofcryoballoonversusradiofrequencyablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationonhealthcareutilizationandcostsaneconomicanalysisfromthefireandicetrial AT schillingrichardj theimpactofcryoballoonversusradiofrequencyablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationonhealthcareutilizationandcostsaneconomicanalysisfromthefireandicetrial AT reynoldsmatthewr theimpactofcryoballoonversusradiofrequencyablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationonhealthcareutilizationandcostsaneconomicanalysisfromthefireandicetrial AT hokansonrobertb theimpactofcryoballoonversusradiofrequencyablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationonhealthcareutilizationandcostsaneconomicanalysisfromthefireandicetrial AT holbrookreece theimpactofcryoballoonversusradiofrequencyablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationonhealthcareutilizationandcostsaneconomicanalysisfromthefireandicetrial AT brownbenedict theimpactofcryoballoonversusradiofrequencyablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationonhealthcareutilizationandcostsaneconomicanalysisfromthefireandicetrial AT schlutermichael theimpactofcryoballoonversusradiofrequencyablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationonhealthcareutilizationandcostsaneconomicanalysisfromthefireandicetrial AT kuckkarlheinz theimpactofcryoballoonversusradiofrequencyablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationonhealthcareutilizationandcostsaneconomicanalysisfromthefireandicetrial AT theimpactofcryoballoonversusradiofrequencyablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationonhealthcareutilizationandcostsaneconomicanalysisfromthefireandicetrial AT chunkrjulian impactofcryoballoonversusradiofrequencyablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationonhealthcareutilizationandcostsaneconomicanalysisfromthefireandicetrial AT brugadajosep impactofcryoballoonversusradiofrequencyablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationonhealthcareutilizationandcostsaneconomicanalysisfromthefireandicetrial AT elvanarif impactofcryoballoonversusradiofrequencyablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationonhealthcareutilizationandcostsaneconomicanalysisfromthefireandicetrial AT gellerlaszlo impactofcryoballoonversusradiofrequencyablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationonhealthcareutilizationandcostsaneconomicanalysisfromthefireandicetrial AT buschmatthias impactofcryoballoonversusradiofrequencyablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationonhealthcareutilizationandcostsaneconomicanalysisfromthefireandicetrial AT barreraalberto impactofcryoballoonversusradiofrequencyablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationonhealthcareutilizationandcostsaneconomicanalysisfromthefireandicetrial AT schillingrichardj impactofcryoballoonversusradiofrequencyablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationonhealthcareutilizationandcostsaneconomicanalysisfromthefireandicetrial AT reynoldsmatthewr impactofcryoballoonversusradiofrequencyablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationonhealthcareutilizationandcostsaneconomicanalysisfromthefireandicetrial AT hokansonrobertb impactofcryoballoonversusradiofrequencyablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationonhealthcareutilizationandcostsaneconomicanalysisfromthefireandicetrial AT holbrookreece impactofcryoballoonversusradiofrequencyablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationonhealthcareutilizationandcostsaneconomicanalysisfromthefireandicetrial AT brownbenedict impactofcryoballoonversusradiofrequencyablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationonhealthcareutilizationandcostsaneconomicanalysisfromthefireandicetrial AT schlutermichael impactofcryoballoonversusradiofrequencyablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationonhealthcareutilizationandcostsaneconomicanalysisfromthefireandicetrial AT kuckkarlheinz impactofcryoballoonversusradiofrequencyablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationonhealthcareutilizationandcostsaneconomicanalysisfromthefireandicetrial AT impactofcryoballoonversusradiofrequencyablationforparoxysmalatrialfibrillationonhealthcareutilizationandcostsaneconomicanalysisfromthefireandicetrial |