Cargando…

Blood Pressure Response to Main Renal Artery and Combined Main Renal Artery Plus Branch Renal Denervation in Patients With Resistant Hypertension

BACKGROUND: Single‐electrode ablation of the main renal artery for renal sympathetic denervation showed mixed blood pressure (BP)‐lowering effects. Further improvement of the technique seems crucial to optimize effectiveness of the procedure. Because sympathetic nerve fibers are closer to the lumen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fengler, Karl, Ewen, Sebastian, Höllriegel, Robert, Rommel, Karl‐Philipp, Kulenthiran, Saaraaken, Lauder, Lucas, Cremers, Bodo, Schuler, Gerhard, Linke, Axel, Böhm, Michael, Mahfoud, Felix, Lurz, Philipp
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5586457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28862930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.006196
_version_ 1783261820245508096
author Fengler, Karl
Ewen, Sebastian
Höllriegel, Robert
Rommel, Karl‐Philipp
Kulenthiran, Saaraaken
Lauder, Lucas
Cremers, Bodo
Schuler, Gerhard
Linke, Axel
Böhm, Michael
Mahfoud, Felix
Lurz, Philipp
author_facet Fengler, Karl
Ewen, Sebastian
Höllriegel, Robert
Rommel, Karl‐Philipp
Kulenthiran, Saaraaken
Lauder, Lucas
Cremers, Bodo
Schuler, Gerhard
Linke, Axel
Böhm, Michael
Mahfoud, Felix
Lurz, Philipp
author_sort Fengler, Karl
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Single‐electrode ablation of the main renal artery for renal sympathetic denervation showed mixed blood pressure (BP)‐lowering effects. Further improvement of the technique seems crucial to optimize effectiveness of the procedure. Because sympathetic nerve fibers are closer to the lumen in the distal part of the renal artery, treatment of the distal main artery and its branches has been shown to reduce variability in treatment effects in preclinical studies and a recent randomized trial. Whether this optimized technique improves clinical outcomes remains uncertain. We report a 2‐center experience of main renal artery and combined main renal artery plus branches renal denervation in patients with resistant hypertension using a multielectrode catheter. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty‐five patients with therapy‐resistant hypertension underwent renal sympathetic denervation with combined main renal artery and renal branch ablation and were compared to matched controls undergoing an ablation of the main renal artery only. BP change was assessed by ambulatory measurement at baseline and after 3 months. At baseline, BP was balanced between the groups. After 3 months, BP changed significantly in the combined ablation group (systolic/diastolic 24‐hour mean and daytime mean BP −8.5±9.8/−7.0±10.7 and −9.4±9.8/−7.1±13.5 mm Hg, P<0.001/0.003 and <0.001/0.016, respectively), but not in patients with main artery treatment (−3.5±11.1/−2.0±7.6 and −2.8±10.9/−1.8±7.7 mm Hg, P=0.19/0.20 and 0.19/0.24, respectively). Systolic daytime BP was significantly more reduced in patients with combined ablation than in patients with main artery ablation (P=0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Combined ablation of the main renal artery and branches appears to improve BP‐lowering efficacy and should be further investigated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5586457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55864572017-09-11 Blood Pressure Response to Main Renal Artery and Combined Main Renal Artery Plus Branch Renal Denervation in Patients With Resistant Hypertension Fengler, Karl Ewen, Sebastian Höllriegel, Robert Rommel, Karl‐Philipp Kulenthiran, Saaraaken Lauder, Lucas Cremers, Bodo Schuler, Gerhard Linke, Axel Böhm, Michael Mahfoud, Felix Lurz, Philipp J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Single‐electrode ablation of the main renal artery for renal sympathetic denervation showed mixed blood pressure (BP)‐lowering effects. Further improvement of the technique seems crucial to optimize effectiveness of the procedure. Because sympathetic nerve fibers are closer to the lumen in the distal part of the renal artery, treatment of the distal main artery and its branches has been shown to reduce variability in treatment effects in preclinical studies and a recent randomized trial. Whether this optimized technique improves clinical outcomes remains uncertain. We report a 2‐center experience of main renal artery and combined main renal artery plus branches renal denervation in patients with resistant hypertension using a multielectrode catheter. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty‐five patients with therapy‐resistant hypertension underwent renal sympathetic denervation with combined main renal artery and renal branch ablation and were compared to matched controls undergoing an ablation of the main renal artery only. BP change was assessed by ambulatory measurement at baseline and after 3 months. At baseline, BP was balanced between the groups. After 3 months, BP changed significantly in the combined ablation group (systolic/diastolic 24‐hour mean and daytime mean BP −8.5±9.8/−7.0±10.7 and −9.4±9.8/−7.1±13.5 mm Hg, P<0.001/0.003 and <0.001/0.016, respectively), but not in patients with main artery treatment (−3.5±11.1/−2.0±7.6 and −2.8±10.9/−1.8±7.7 mm Hg, P=0.19/0.20 and 0.19/0.24, respectively). Systolic daytime BP was significantly more reduced in patients with combined ablation than in patients with main artery ablation (P=0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Combined ablation of the main renal artery and branches appears to improve BP‐lowering efficacy and should be further investigated. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5586457/ /pubmed/28862930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.006196 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Fengler, Karl
Ewen, Sebastian
Höllriegel, Robert
Rommel, Karl‐Philipp
Kulenthiran, Saaraaken
Lauder, Lucas
Cremers, Bodo
Schuler, Gerhard
Linke, Axel
Böhm, Michael
Mahfoud, Felix
Lurz, Philipp
Blood Pressure Response to Main Renal Artery and Combined Main Renal Artery Plus Branch Renal Denervation in Patients With Resistant Hypertension
title Blood Pressure Response to Main Renal Artery and Combined Main Renal Artery Plus Branch Renal Denervation in Patients With Resistant Hypertension
title_full Blood Pressure Response to Main Renal Artery and Combined Main Renal Artery Plus Branch Renal Denervation in Patients With Resistant Hypertension
title_fullStr Blood Pressure Response to Main Renal Artery and Combined Main Renal Artery Plus Branch Renal Denervation in Patients With Resistant Hypertension
title_full_unstemmed Blood Pressure Response to Main Renal Artery and Combined Main Renal Artery Plus Branch Renal Denervation in Patients With Resistant Hypertension
title_short Blood Pressure Response to Main Renal Artery and Combined Main Renal Artery Plus Branch Renal Denervation in Patients With Resistant Hypertension
title_sort blood pressure response to main renal artery and combined main renal artery plus branch renal denervation in patients with resistant hypertension
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5586457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28862930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.006196
work_keys_str_mv AT fenglerkarl bloodpressureresponsetomainrenalarteryandcombinedmainrenalarteryplusbranchrenaldenervationinpatientswithresistanthypertension
AT ewensebastian bloodpressureresponsetomainrenalarteryandcombinedmainrenalarteryplusbranchrenaldenervationinpatientswithresistanthypertension
AT hollriegelrobert bloodpressureresponsetomainrenalarteryandcombinedmainrenalarteryplusbranchrenaldenervationinpatientswithresistanthypertension
AT rommelkarlphilipp bloodpressureresponsetomainrenalarteryandcombinedmainrenalarteryplusbranchrenaldenervationinpatientswithresistanthypertension
AT kulenthiransaaraaken bloodpressureresponsetomainrenalarteryandcombinedmainrenalarteryplusbranchrenaldenervationinpatientswithresistanthypertension
AT lauderlucas bloodpressureresponsetomainrenalarteryandcombinedmainrenalarteryplusbranchrenaldenervationinpatientswithresistanthypertension
AT cremersbodo bloodpressureresponsetomainrenalarteryandcombinedmainrenalarteryplusbranchrenaldenervationinpatientswithresistanthypertension
AT schulergerhard bloodpressureresponsetomainrenalarteryandcombinedmainrenalarteryplusbranchrenaldenervationinpatientswithresistanthypertension
AT linkeaxel bloodpressureresponsetomainrenalarteryandcombinedmainrenalarteryplusbranchrenaldenervationinpatientswithresistanthypertension
AT bohmmichael bloodpressureresponsetomainrenalarteryandcombinedmainrenalarteryplusbranchrenaldenervationinpatientswithresistanthypertension
AT mahfoudfelix bloodpressureresponsetomainrenalarteryandcombinedmainrenalarteryplusbranchrenaldenervationinpatientswithresistanthypertension
AT lurzphilipp bloodpressureresponsetomainrenalarteryandcombinedmainrenalarteryplusbranchrenaldenervationinpatientswithresistanthypertension