Cargando…

Current Recommendations for Cervical Cancer Screening: Do They Render the Annual Pelvic Examination Obsolete?

The development of a screening test for cervical dysplasia has been a major force in diminishing the worldwide incidence of invasive cervical cancer. Screening intervals recommended by professional organizations have changed over the past half century. Recognition of the human papillomavirus (HPV) a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kauffman, Robert P., Griffin, Stephen J., Lund, Jon D., Tullar, Paul E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5586750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23328247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000346137
_version_ 1783261866963763200
author Kauffman, Robert P.
Griffin, Stephen J.
Lund, Jon D.
Tullar, Paul E.
author_facet Kauffman, Robert P.
Griffin, Stephen J.
Lund, Jon D.
Tullar, Paul E.
author_sort Kauffman, Robert P.
collection PubMed
description The development of a screening test for cervical dysplasia has been a major force in diminishing the worldwide incidence of invasive cervical cancer. Screening intervals recommended by professional organizations have changed over the past half century. Recognition of the human papillomavirus (HPV) as the causative agent and enhanced understanding of the natural history of HPV and cervical dysplasia in different age groups have prompted the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and other professional societies to defer Pap smear screening to intervals no less than 2 years apart in women 21–29, and every 3 years in women 30 and over assuming no prior history of cervical dysplasia. Screening should start no sooner than age 21. These recommendations more closely resemble those currently practiced in Europe and other parts of the developed world. Those who have undergone hysterectomy no longer need screening unless high-grade dysplasia was present. Although the value of pelvic examination is not debated in women with symptoms referable to the female genital tract, the endorsement by several professional societies of less than annual cervical cancer screening in healthy women also begs the question of whether annual pelvic examination (speculum and/or bimanual examination) benefits asymptomatic women. Some sexually transmitted infections are amenable to self-insertion of a vaginal probe or detectable by voided urine specimen. Bimanual examination is insensitive in detecting early ovarian cancer with a high false-positive rate leading to patient anxiety, excessive diagnostic testing, and unnecessary surgical procedures. Future study should focus on the frequency in which healthy asymptomatic women should undergo pelvic examination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5586750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher S. Karger AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55867502017-11-01 Current Recommendations for Cervical Cancer Screening: Do They Render the Annual Pelvic Examination Obsolete? Kauffman, Robert P. Griffin, Stephen J. Lund, Jon D. Tullar, Paul E. Med Princ Pract Review The development of a screening test for cervical dysplasia has been a major force in diminishing the worldwide incidence of invasive cervical cancer. Screening intervals recommended by professional organizations have changed over the past half century. Recognition of the human papillomavirus (HPV) as the causative agent and enhanced understanding of the natural history of HPV and cervical dysplasia in different age groups have prompted the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and other professional societies to defer Pap smear screening to intervals no less than 2 years apart in women 21–29, and every 3 years in women 30 and over assuming no prior history of cervical dysplasia. Screening should start no sooner than age 21. These recommendations more closely resemble those currently practiced in Europe and other parts of the developed world. Those who have undergone hysterectomy no longer need screening unless high-grade dysplasia was present. Although the value of pelvic examination is not debated in women with symptoms referable to the female genital tract, the endorsement by several professional societies of less than annual cervical cancer screening in healthy women also begs the question of whether annual pelvic examination (speculum and/or bimanual examination) benefits asymptomatic women. Some sexually transmitted infections are amenable to self-insertion of a vaginal probe or detectable by voided urine specimen. Bimanual examination is insensitive in detecting early ovarian cancer with a high false-positive rate leading to patient anxiety, excessive diagnostic testing, and unnecessary surgical procedures. Future study should focus on the frequency in which healthy asymptomatic women should undergo pelvic examination. S. Karger AG 2013-06 2013-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5586750/ /pubmed/23328247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000346137 Text en Copyright © 2013 by S. Karger AG, Basel http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported license (CC BY-NC) (www.karger.com/OA-license), applicable to the online version of the article only. Distribution permitted for non-commercial purposes only.
spellingShingle Review
Kauffman, Robert P.
Griffin, Stephen J.
Lund, Jon D.
Tullar, Paul E.
Current Recommendations for Cervical Cancer Screening: Do They Render the Annual Pelvic Examination Obsolete?
title Current Recommendations for Cervical Cancer Screening: Do They Render the Annual Pelvic Examination Obsolete?
title_full Current Recommendations for Cervical Cancer Screening: Do They Render the Annual Pelvic Examination Obsolete?
title_fullStr Current Recommendations for Cervical Cancer Screening: Do They Render the Annual Pelvic Examination Obsolete?
title_full_unstemmed Current Recommendations for Cervical Cancer Screening: Do They Render the Annual Pelvic Examination Obsolete?
title_short Current Recommendations for Cervical Cancer Screening: Do They Render the Annual Pelvic Examination Obsolete?
title_sort current recommendations for cervical cancer screening: do they render the annual pelvic examination obsolete?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5586750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23328247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000346137
work_keys_str_mv AT kauffmanrobertp currentrecommendationsforcervicalcancerscreeningdotheyrendertheannualpelvicexaminationobsolete
AT griffinstephenj currentrecommendationsforcervicalcancerscreeningdotheyrendertheannualpelvicexaminationobsolete
AT lundjond currentrecommendationsforcervicalcancerscreeningdotheyrendertheannualpelvicexaminationobsolete
AT tullarpaule currentrecommendationsforcervicalcancerscreeningdotheyrendertheannualpelvicexaminationobsolete