Cargando…

Immunosuppressive Medication Adherence in Kidney Transplant Patients

OBJECTIVES: To assess the degree of immunosuppressive medication adherence in kidney transplant patients (KTPs) and to determine if there is a difference in the rate of adherence to tacrolimus (Tac), cyclosporine (CsA) and sirolimus (Sir). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: From a total of 63 KTPs treated at the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lalić, Jelena, Veličković-Radovanović, Radmila, Mitić, Branka, Paunović, Goran, Cvetković, Tatjana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5586898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24923773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000362792
_version_ 1783261901044580352
author Lalić, Jelena
Veličković-Radovanović, Radmila
Mitić, Branka
Paunović, Goran
Cvetković, Tatjana
author_facet Lalić, Jelena
Veličković-Radovanović, Radmila
Mitić, Branka
Paunović, Goran
Cvetković, Tatjana
author_sort Lalić, Jelena
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the degree of immunosuppressive medication adherence in kidney transplant patients (KTPs) and to determine if there is a difference in the rate of adherence to tacrolimus (Tac), cyclosporine (CsA) and sirolimus (Sir). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: From a total of 63 KTPs treated at the Clinic of Nephrology, Clinical Centre Niš, Serbia, 60 participated in the study by responding to questionnaires. They were divided into the adherence group (n = 43) and the nonadherence group (n = 17) according to their degree of adherence which was measured using a validated survey form, the simplified medication adherence questionnaire. The KTP adherence to the different immunosuppressive regimens (Tac, CsA and Sir) was compared. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t test. RESULTS: Adherence was observed in 43 (71.7%) patients, and only 17 (28.3%) did not follow the prescribed therapy. The estimated glomerular filtration rate was significantly lower in the nonadherence group (38.52 ± 18.22 ml/min) than in the adherence group (52.43 ± 16.91 ml/min, p < 0.05). With regard to the Tac level, a significant difference was also found between the adherers and the nonadherers (6.30 ± 2.06 vs. 5.0 ± 1.52 ng/ml, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The KTPs in this study demonstrated a high level of adherence. Nonadherence was associated with worse graft function and a lower Tac level. Knowledge about the degree of adherence could help the early identification of nonadherent patients and the development of strategies to improve this.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5586898
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher S. Karger AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55868982017-11-01 Immunosuppressive Medication Adherence in Kidney Transplant Patients Lalić, Jelena Veličković-Radovanović, Radmila Mitić, Branka Paunović, Goran Cvetković, Tatjana Med Princ Pract Original Paper OBJECTIVES: To assess the degree of immunosuppressive medication adherence in kidney transplant patients (KTPs) and to determine if there is a difference in the rate of adherence to tacrolimus (Tac), cyclosporine (CsA) and sirolimus (Sir). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: From a total of 63 KTPs treated at the Clinic of Nephrology, Clinical Centre Niš, Serbia, 60 participated in the study by responding to questionnaires. They were divided into the adherence group (n = 43) and the nonadherence group (n = 17) according to their degree of adherence which was measured using a validated survey form, the simplified medication adherence questionnaire. The KTP adherence to the different immunosuppressive regimens (Tac, CsA and Sir) was compared. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t test. RESULTS: Adherence was observed in 43 (71.7%) patients, and only 17 (28.3%) did not follow the prescribed therapy. The estimated glomerular filtration rate was significantly lower in the nonadherence group (38.52 ± 18.22 ml/min) than in the adherence group (52.43 ± 16.91 ml/min, p < 0.05). With regard to the Tac level, a significant difference was also found between the adherers and the nonadherers (6.30 ± 2.06 vs. 5.0 ± 1.52 ng/ml, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The KTPs in this study demonstrated a high level of adherence. Nonadherence was associated with worse graft function and a lower Tac level. Knowledge about the degree of adherence could help the early identification of nonadherent patients and the development of strategies to improve this. S. Karger AG 2014-07 2014-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5586898/ /pubmed/24923773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000362792 Text en Copyright © 2014 by S. Karger AG, Basel http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported license (CC BY-NC) (www.karger.com/OA-license), applicable to the online version of the article only. Distribution permitted for non-commercial purposes only.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Lalić, Jelena
Veličković-Radovanović, Radmila
Mitić, Branka
Paunović, Goran
Cvetković, Tatjana
Immunosuppressive Medication Adherence in Kidney Transplant Patients
title Immunosuppressive Medication Adherence in Kidney Transplant Patients
title_full Immunosuppressive Medication Adherence in Kidney Transplant Patients
title_fullStr Immunosuppressive Medication Adherence in Kidney Transplant Patients
title_full_unstemmed Immunosuppressive Medication Adherence in Kidney Transplant Patients
title_short Immunosuppressive Medication Adherence in Kidney Transplant Patients
title_sort immunosuppressive medication adherence in kidney transplant patients
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5586898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24923773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000362792
work_keys_str_mv AT lalicjelena immunosuppressivemedicationadherenceinkidneytransplantpatients
AT velickovicradovanovicradmila immunosuppressivemedicationadherenceinkidneytransplantpatients
AT miticbranka immunosuppressivemedicationadherenceinkidneytransplantpatients
AT paunovicgoran immunosuppressivemedicationadherenceinkidneytransplantpatients
AT cvetkovictatjana immunosuppressivemedicationadherenceinkidneytransplantpatients