Cargando…
A new functional method to choose the target lobe for lung volume reduction in emphysema – comparison with the conventional densitometric method
BACKGROUND: Lung volume reduction (LVR) improves breathing mechanics by reducing hyperinflation. Lobar selection usually focuses on choosing the most destroyed emphysematous lobes as seen on an inspiratory CT scan. However, it has never been shown to what extent these densitometric CT parameters pre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5586979/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28919730 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S139304 |
_version_ | 1783261919602278400 |
---|---|
author | Hetzel, Juergen Boeckeler, Michael Horger, Marius Ehab, Ahmed Kloth, Christopher Wagner, Robert Freitag, Lutz Slebos, Dirk-Jan Lewis, Richard Alexander Haentschel, Maik |
author_facet | Hetzel, Juergen Boeckeler, Michael Horger, Marius Ehab, Ahmed Kloth, Christopher Wagner, Robert Freitag, Lutz Slebos, Dirk-Jan Lewis, Richard Alexander Haentschel, Maik |
author_sort | Hetzel, Juergen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Lung volume reduction (LVR) improves breathing mechanics by reducing hyperinflation. Lobar selection usually focuses on choosing the most destroyed emphysematous lobes as seen on an inspiratory CT scan. However, it has never been shown to what extent these densitometric CT parameters predict the least deflation of an individual lobe during expiration. The addition of expiratory CT analysis allows measurement of the extent of lobar air trapping and could therefore provide additional functional information for choice of potential treatment targets. OBJECTIVES: To determine lobar vital capacity/lobar total capacity (LVC/LTC) as a functional parameter for lobar air trapping using on an inspiratory and expiratory CT scan. To compare lobar selection by LVC/LTC with the established morphological CT density parameters. METHODS: 36 patients referred for endoscopic LVR were studied. LVC/LTC, defined as delta volume over maximum volume of a lobe, was calculated using inspiratory and expiratory CT scans. The CT morphological parameters of mean lung density (MLD), low attenuation volume (LAV), and 15th percentile of Hounsfield units (15%P) were determined on an inspiratory CT scan for each lobe. We compared and correlated LVC/LTC with MLD, LAV, and 15%P. RESULTS: There was a weak correlation between the functional parameter LVC/LTC and all inspiratory densitometric parameters. Target lobe selection using lowest lobar deflation (lowest LVC/LTC) correlated with target lobe selection based on lowest MLD in 18 patients (50.0%), with the highest LAV in 13 patients (36.1%), and with the lowest 15%P in 12 patients (33.3%). CONCLUSION: CT-based measurement of deflation (LVC/LTC) as a functional parameter correlates weakly with all densitometric CT parameters on a lobar level. Therefore, morphological criteria based on inspiratory CT densitometry partially reflect the deflation of particular lung lobes, and may be of limited value as a sole predictor for target lobe selection in LVR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5586979 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55869792017-09-15 A new functional method to choose the target lobe for lung volume reduction in emphysema – comparison with the conventional densitometric method Hetzel, Juergen Boeckeler, Michael Horger, Marius Ehab, Ahmed Kloth, Christopher Wagner, Robert Freitag, Lutz Slebos, Dirk-Jan Lewis, Richard Alexander Haentschel, Maik Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: Lung volume reduction (LVR) improves breathing mechanics by reducing hyperinflation. Lobar selection usually focuses on choosing the most destroyed emphysematous lobes as seen on an inspiratory CT scan. However, it has never been shown to what extent these densitometric CT parameters predict the least deflation of an individual lobe during expiration. The addition of expiratory CT analysis allows measurement of the extent of lobar air trapping and could therefore provide additional functional information for choice of potential treatment targets. OBJECTIVES: To determine lobar vital capacity/lobar total capacity (LVC/LTC) as a functional parameter for lobar air trapping using on an inspiratory and expiratory CT scan. To compare lobar selection by LVC/LTC with the established morphological CT density parameters. METHODS: 36 patients referred for endoscopic LVR were studied. LVC/LTC, defined as delta volume over maximum volume of a lobe, was calculated using inspiratory and expiratory CT scans. The CT morphological parameters of mean lung density (MLD), low attenuation volume (LAV), and 15th percentile of Hounsfield units (15%P) were determined on an inspiratory CT scan for each lobe. We compared and correlated LVC/LTC with MLD, LAV, and 15%P. RESULTS: There was a weak correlation between the functional parameter LVC/LTC and all inspiratory densitometric parameters. Target lobe selection using lowest lobar deflation (lowest LVC/LTC) correlated with target lobe selection based on lowest MLD in 18 patients (50.0%), with the highest LAV in 13 patients (36.1%), and with the lowest 15%P in 12 patients (33.3%). CONCLUSION: CT-based measurement of deflation (LVC/LTC) as a functional parameter correlates weakly with all densitometric CT parameters on a lobar level. Therefore, morphological criteria based on inspiratory CT densitometry partially reflect the deflation of particular lung lobes, and may be of limited value as a sole predictor for target lobe selection in LVR. Dove Medical Press 2017-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5586979/ /pubmed/28919730 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S139304 Text en © 2017 Hetzel et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Hetzel, Juergen Boeckeler, Michael Horger, Marius Ehab, Ahmed Kloth, Christopher Wagner, Robert Freitag, Lutz Slebos, Dirk-Jan Lewis, Richard Alexander Haentschel, Maik A new functional method to choose the target lobe for lung volume reduction in emphysema – comparison with the conventional densitometric method |
title | A new functional method to choose the target lobe for lung volume reduction in emphysema – comparison with the conventional densitometric method |
title_full | A new functional method to choose the target lobe for lung volume reduction in emphysema – comparison with the conventional densitometric method |
title_fullStr | A new functional method to choose the target lobe for lung volume reduction in emphysema – comparison with the conventional densitometric method |
title_full_unstemmed | A new functional method to choose the target lobe for lung volume reduction in emphysema – comparison with the conventional densitometric method |
title_short | A new functional method to choose the target lobe for lung volume reduction in emphysema – comparison with the conventional densitometric method |
title_sort | new functional method to choose the target lobe for lung volume reduction in emphysema – comparison with the conventional densitometric method |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5586979/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28919730 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S139304 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hetzeljuergen anewfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod AT boeckelermichael anewfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod AT horgermarius anewfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod AT ehabahmed anewfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod AT klothchristopher anewfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod AT wagnerrobert anewfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod AT freitaglutz anewfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod AT slebosdirkjan anewfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod AT lewisrichardalexander anewfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod AT haentschelmaik anewfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod AT hetzeljuergen newfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod AT boeckelermichael newfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod AT horgermarius newfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod AT ehabahmed newfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod AT klothchristopher newfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod AT wagnerrobert newfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod AT freitaglutz newfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod AT slebosdirkjan newfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod AT lewisrichardalexander newfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod AT haentschelmaik newfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod |