Cargando…

A new functional method to choose the target lobe for lung volume reduction in emphysema – comparison with the conventional densitometric method

BACKGROUND: Lung volume reduction (LVR) improves breathing mechanics by reducing hyperinflation. Lobar selection usually focuses on choosing the most destroyed emphysematous lobes as seen on an inspiratory CT scan. However, it has never been shown to what extent these densitometric CT parameters pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hetzel, Juergen, Boeckeler, Michael, Horger, Marius, Ehab, Ahmed, Kloth, Christopher, Wagner, Robert, Freitag, Lutz, Slebos, Dirk-Jan, Lewis, Richard Alexander, Haentschel, Maik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5586979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28919730
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S139304
_version_ 1783261919602278400
author Hetzel, Juergen
Boeckeler, Michael
Horger, Marius
Ehab, Ahmed
Kloth, Christopher
Wagner, Robert
Freitag, Lutz
Slebos, Dirk-Jan
Lewis, Richard Alexander
Haentschel, Maik
author_facet Hetzel, Juergen
Boeckeler, Michael
Horger, Marius
Ehab, Ahmed
Kloth, Christopher
Wagner, Robert
Freitag, Lutz
Slebos, Dirk-Jan
Lewis, Richard Alexander
Haentschel, Maik
author_sort Hetzel, Juergen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lung volume reduction (LVR) improves breathing mechanics by reducing hyperinflation. Lobar selection usually focuses on choosing the most destroyed emphysematous lobes as seen on an inspiratory CT scan. However, it has never been shown to what extent these densitometric CT parameters predict the least deflation of an individual lobe during expiration. The addition of expiratory CT analysis allows measurement of the extent of lobar air trapping and could therefore provide additional functional information for choice of potential treatment targets. OBJECTIVES: To determine lobar vital capacity/lobar total capacity (LVC/LTC) as a functional parameter for lobar air trapping using on an inspiratory and expiratory CT scan. To compare lobar selection by LVC/LTC with the established morphological CT density parameters. METHODS: 36 patients referred for endoscopic LVR were studied. LVC/LTC, defined as delta volume over maximum volume of a lobe, was calculated using inspiratory and expiratory CT scans. The CT morphological parameters of mean lung density (MLD), low attenuation volume (LAV), and 15th percentile of Hounsfield units (15%P) were determined on an inspiratory CT scan for each lobe. We compared and correlated LVC/LTC with MLD, LAV, and 15%P. RESULTS: There was a weak correlation between the functional parameter LVC/LTC and all inspiratory densitometric parameters. Target lobe selection using lowest lobar deflation (lowest LVC/LTC) correlated with target lobe selection based on lowest MLD in 18 patients (50.0%), with the highest LAV in 13 patients (36.1%), and with the lowest 15%P in 12 patients (33.3%). CONCLUSION: CT-based measurement of deflation (LVC/LTC) as a functional parameter correlates weakly with all densitometric CT parameters on a lobar level. Therefore, morphological criteria based on inspiratory CT densitometry partially reflect the deflation of particular lung lobes, and may be of limited value as a sole predictor for target lobe selection in LVR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5586979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55869792017-09-15 A new functional method to choose the target lobe for lung volume reduction in emphysema – comparison with the conventional densitometric method Hetzel, Juergen Boeckeler, Michael Horger, Marius Ehab, Ahmed Kloth, Christopher Wagner, Robert Freitag, Lutz Slebos, Dirk-Jan Lewis, Richard Alexander Haentschel, Maik Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: Lung volume reduction (LVR) improves breathing mechanics by reducing hyperinflation. Lobar selection usually focuses on choosing the most destroyed emphysematous lobes as seen on an inspiratory CT scan. However, it has never been shown to what extent these densitometric CT parameters predict the least deflation of an individual lobe during expiration. The addition of expiratory CT analysis allows measurement of the extent of lobar air trapping and could therefore provide additional functional information for choice of potential treatment targets. OBJECTIVES: To determine lobar vital capacity/lobar total capacity (LVC/LTC) as a functional parameter for lobar air trapping using on an inspiratory and expiratory CT scan. To compare lobar selection by LVC/LTC with the established morphological CT density parameters. METHODS: 36 patients referred for endoscopic LVR were studied. LVC/LTC, defined as delta volume over maximum volume of a lobe, was calculated using inspiratory and expiratory CT scans. The CT morphological parameters of mean lung density (MLD), low attenuation volume (LAV), and 15th percentile of Hounsfield units (15%P) were determined on an inspiratory CT scan for each lobe. We compared and correlated LVC/LTC with MLD, LAV, and 15%P. RESULTS: There was a weak correlation between the functional parameter LVC/LTC and all inspiratory densitometric parameters. Target lobe selection using lowest lobar deflation (lowest LVC/LTC) correlated with target lobe selection based on lowest MLD in 18 patients (50.0%), with the highest LAV in 13 patients (36.1%), and with the lowest 15%P in 12 patients (33.3%). CONCLUSION: CT-based measurement of deflation (LVC/LTC) as a functional parameter correlates weakly with all densitometric CT parameters on a lobar level. Therefore, morphological criteria based on inspiratory CT densitometry partially reflect the deflation of particular lung lobes, and may be of limited value as a sole predictor for target lobe selection in LVR. Dove Medical Press 2017-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5586979/ /pubmed/28919730 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S139304 Text en © 2017 Hetzel et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Hetzel, Juergen
Boeckeler, Michael
Horger, Marius
Ehab, Ahmed
Kloth, Christopher
Wagner, Robert
Freitag, Lutz
Slebos, Dirk-Jan
Lewis, Richard Alexander
Haentschel, Maik
A new functional method to choose the target lobe for lung volume reduction in emphysema – comparison with the conventional densitometric method
title A new functional method to choose the target lobe for lung volume reduction in emphysema – comparison with the conventional densitometric method
title_full A new functional method to choose the target lobe for lung volume reduction in emphysema – comparison with the conventional densitometric method
title_fullStr A new functional method to choose the target lobe for lung volume reduction in emphysema – comparison with the conventional densitometric method
title_full_unstemmed A new functional method to choose the target lobe for lung volume reduction in emphysema – comparison with the conventional densitometric method
title_short A new functional method to choose the target lobe for lung volume reduction in emphysema – comparison with the conventional densitometric method
title_sort new functional method to choose the target lobe for lung volume reduction in emphysema – comparison with the conventional densitometric method
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5586979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28919730
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S139304
work_keys_str_mv AT hetzeljuergen anewfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod
AT boeckelermichael anewfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod
AT horgermarius anewfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod
AT ehabahmed anewfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod
AT klothchristopher anewfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod
AT wagnerrobert anewfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod
AT freitaglutz anewfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod
AT slebosdirkjan anewfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod
AT lewisrichardalexander anewfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod
AT haentschelmaik anewfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod
AT hetzeljuergen newfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod
AT boeckelermichael newfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod
AT horgermarius newfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod
AT ehabahmed newfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod
AT klothchristopher newfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod
AT wagnerrobert newfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod
AT freitaglutz newfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod
AT slebosdirkjan newfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod
AT lewisrichardalexander newfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod
AT haentschelmaik newfunctionalmethodtochoosethetargetlobeforlungvolumereductioninemphysemacomparisonwiththeconventionaldensitometricmethod