Cargando…

A review and meta-analysis of corneal cross-linking for post-laser vision correction ectasia

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to review the safety and stability of cornea cross-linking (CXL) for the treatment of keratectasia after Excimer Laser Refractive Surgery. METHODS: Eligible studies were identified by systematically searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and reference lists. Meta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wan, Qi, Wang, Dan, Ye, HongQuan, Tang, Jing, Han, Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5587251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28913504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2017.02.008
_version_ 1783261959495352320
author Wan, Qi
Wang, Dan
Ye, HongQuan
Tang, Jing
Han, Yu
author_facet Wan, Qi
Wang, Dan
Ye, HongQuan
Tang, Jing
Han, Yu
author_sort Wan, Qi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to review the safety and stability of cornea cross-linking (CXL) for the treatment of keratectasia after Excimer Laser Refractive Surgery. METHODS: Eligible studies were identified by systematically searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and reference lists. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 12.1 software. The primary outcome parameters included the changes of corrected distant visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), the maximum keratometry value (Kmax) and minimum keratometry value (Kmin), the surface regularity index (SRI), the surface asymmetry index (SAI), the keratoconus prediction index (KPI), corneal thickness, and endothelial cell count. Efficacy estimates were evaluated by weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for absolute changes of the interested outcomes. RESULTS: Seven studies involving 118 patients treated with CXL for progressive ectasia after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) (140 eyes; the follow-up time range from 12 to 62 months) were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that there were no significant differences in Kmax and Kmin values after CXL (WMD = 0.584; 95% CI: −0.289 to 1.458; P = 0.19; WMD = 0.466; 95% CI: −0.625 to 1.556; P = 0.403, respectively). The CDVA improved significantly after CXL (WMD = 0.045; 95% CI: 0.010 to 0.079; P = 0.011), whereas UCVA did not differ statistically (WMD = 0.011; 95% CI: −0.055 to 0.077; P = 0.746). The changes were not statistically significant in SRI, SAI, and KPI (WMD = 0.116; 95% CI: −0.090 to 0.322; P = 0.269; WMD = 0.240; 95% CI: −0.200 to 0.681; P = 0.285; WMD = 0.045; 95% CI: −0.001 to 0.090; P = 0.056, respectively). Endothelial cell count and corneal thickness did not deteriorate (WMD = 12.634; 95% CI: −29.460 to 54.729; P = 0.556; WMD = 0.657; 95% CI: −9.402 to 10.717; P = 0.898, respectively). CONCLUSION: The study showed that CXL is a promising treatment to stabilize the keratectasia after Excimer Laser Refractive Surgery. Further long-term follow-up studies are necessary to assess the persistence of the effect of the CXL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5587251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55872512017-09-14 A review and meta-analysis of corneal cross-linking for post-laser vision correction ectasia Wan, Qi Wang, Dan Ye, HongQuan Tang, Jing Han, Yu J Curr Ophthalmol Review PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to review the safety and stability of cornea cross-linking (CXL) for the treatment of keratectasia after Excimer Laser Refractive Surgery. METHODS: Eligible studies were identified by systematically searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and reference lists. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 12.1 software. The primary outcome parameters included the changes of corrected distant visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), the maximum keratometry value (Kmax) and minimum keratometry value (Kmin), the surface regularity index (SRI), the surface asymmetry index (SAI), the keratoconus prediction index (KPI), corneal thickness, and endothelial cell count. Efficacy estimates were evaluated by weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for absolute changes of the interested outcomes. RESULTS: Seven studies involving 118 patients treated with CXL for progressive ectasia after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) (140 eyes; the follow-up time range from 12 to 62 months) were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that there were no significant differences in Kmax and Kmin values after CXL (WMD = 0.584; 95% CI: −0.289 to 1.458; P = 0.19; WMD = 0.466; 95% CI: −0.625 to 1.556; P = 0.403, respectively). The CDVA improved significantly after CXL (WMD = 0.045; 95% CI: 0.010 to 0.079; P = 0.011), whereas UCVA did not differ statistically (WMD = 0.011; 95% CI: −0.055 to 0.077; P = 0.746). The changes were not statistically significant in SRI, SAI, and KPI (WMD = 0.116; 95% CI: −0.090 to 0.322; P = 0.269; WMD = 0.240; 95% CI: −0.200 to 0.681; P = 0.285; WMD = 0.045; 95% CI: −0.001 to 0.090; P = 0.056, respectively). Endothelial cell count and corneal thickness did not deteriorate (WMD = 12.634; 95% CI: −29.460 to 54.729; P = 0.556; WMD = 0.657; 95% CI: −9.402 to 10.717; P = 0.898, respectively). CONCLUSION: The study showed that CXL is a promising treatment to stabilize the keratectasia after Excimer Laser Refractive Surgery. Further long-term follow-up studies are necessary to assess the persistence of the effect of the CXL. Elsevier 2017-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5587251/ /pubmed/28913504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2017.02.008 Text en Copyright © 2017, Iranian Society of Ophthalmology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Wan, Qi
Wang, Dan
Ye, HongQuan
Tang, Jing
Han, Yu
A review and meta-analysis of corneal cross-linking for post-laser vision correction ectasia
title A review and meta-analysis of corneal cross-linking for post-laser vision correction ectasia
title_full A review and meta-analysis of corneal cross-linking for post-laser vision correction ectasia
title_fullStr A review and meta-analysis of corneal cross-linking for post-laser vision correction ectasia
title_full_unstemmed A review and meta-analysis of corneal cross-linking for post-laser vision correction ectasia
title_short A review and meta-analysis of corneal cross-linking for post-laser vision correction ectasia
title_sort review and meta-analysis of corneal cross-linking for post-laser vision correction ectasia
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5587251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28913504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2017.02.008
work_keys_str_mv AT wanqi areviewandmetaanalysisofcornealcrosslinkingforpostlaservisioncorrectionectasia
AT wangdan areviewandmetaanalysisofcornealcrosslinkingforpostlaservisioncorrectionectasia
AT yehongquan areviewandmetaanalysisofcornealcrosslinkingforpostlaservisioncorrectionectasia
AT tangjing areviewandmetaanalysisofcornealcrosslinkingforpostlaservisioncorrectionectasia
AT hanyu areviewandmetaanalysisofcornealcrosslinkingforpostlaservisioncorrectionectasia
AT wanqi reviewandmetaanalysisofcornealcrosslinkingforpostlaservisioncorrectionectasia
AT wangdan reviewandmetaanalysisofcornealcrosslinkingforpostlaservisioncorrectionectasia
AT yehongquan reviewandmetaanalysisofcornealcrosslinkingforpostlaservisioncorrectionectasia
AT tangjing reviewandmetaanalysisofcornealcrosslinkingforpostlaservisioncorrectionectasia
AT hanyu reviewandmetaanalysisofcornealcrosslinkingforpostlaservisioncorrectionectasia