Cargando…

Is biotechnology (more) acceptable when it enables a reduction in phytosanitary treatments? A European comparison of the acceptability of transgenesis and cisgenesis

Reduced pesticide use is one of the reasons given by Europeans for accepting new genetic engineering techniques. According to the advocates of these techniques, consumers are likely to embrace the application of cisgenesis to apple trees. In order to verify the acceptability of these techniques, we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rousselière, Damien, Rousselière, Samira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5587272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28877215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183213
_version_ 1783261964516982784
author Rousselière, Damien
Rousselière, Samira
author_facet Rousselière, Damien
Rousselière, Samira
author_sort Rousselière, Damien
collection PubMed
description Reduced pesticide use is one of the reasons given by Europeans for accepting new genetic engineering techniques. According to the advocates of these techniques, consumers are likely to embrace the application of cisgenesis to apple trees. In order to verify the acceptability of these techniques, we estimate a Bayesian multilevel structural equation model, which takes into account the multidimensional nature of acceptability and individual, national, and European effects, using data from the Eurobarometer 2010 73.1 on science. The results underline the persistence of clear differences between European countries and whilst showing considerable defiance, a relatively wider acceptability of vertical gene transfer as a means of reducing phytosanitary treatments, compared to horizontal transfer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5587272
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55872722017-09-15 Is biotechnology (more) acceptable when it enables a reduction in phytosanitary treatments? A European comparison of the acceptability of transgenesis and cisgenesis Rousselière, Damien Rousselière, Samira PLoS One Research Article Reduced pesticide use is one of the reasons given by Europeans for accepting new genetic engineering techniques. According to the advocates of these techniques, consumers are likely to embrace the application of cisgenesis to apple trees. In order to verify the acceptability of these techniques, we estimate a Bayesian multilevel structural equation model, which takes into account the multidimensional nature of acceptability and individual, national, and European effects, using data from the Eurobarometer 2010 73.1 on science. The results underline the persistence of clear differences between European countries and whilst showing considerable defiance, a relatively wider acceptability of vertical gene transfer as a means of reducing phytosanitary treatments, compared to horizontal transfer. Public Library of Science 2017-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5587272/ /pubmed/28877215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183213 Text en © 2017 Rousselière, Rousselière http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rousselière, Damien
Rousselière, Samira
Is biotechnology (more) acceptable when it enables a reduction in phytosanitary treatments? A European comparison of the acceptability of transgenesis and cisgenesis
title Is biotechnology (more) acceptable when it enables a reduction in phytosanitary treatments? A European comparison of the acceptability of transgenesis and cisgenesis
title_full Is biotechnology (more) acceptable when it enables a reduction in phytosanitary treatments? A European comparison of the acceptability of transgenesis and cisgenesis
title_fullStr Is biotechnology (more) acceptable when it enables a reduction in phytosanitary treatments? A European comparison of the acceptability of transgenesis and cisgenesis
title_full_unstemmed Is biotechnology (more) acceptable when it enables a reduction in phytosanitary treatments? A European comparison of the acceptability of transgenesis and cisgenesis
title_short Is biotechnology (more) acceptable when it enables a reduction in phytosanitary treatments? A European comparison of the acceptability of transgenesis and cisgenesis
title_sort is biotechnology (more) acceptable when it enables a reduction in phytosanitary treatments? a european comparison of the acceptability of transgenesis and cisgenesis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5587272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28877215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183213
work_keys_str_mv AT rousselieredamien isbiotechnologymoreacceptablewhenitenablesareductioninphytosanitarytreatmentsaeuropeancomparisonoftheacceptabilityoftransgenesisandcisgenesis
AT rousselieresamira isbiotechnologymoreacceptablewhenitenablesareductioninphytosanitarytreatmentsaeuropeancomparisonoftheacceptabilityoftransgenesisandcisgenesis