Cargando…

Retrospective Review on Accuracy: A Pilot Study of Robotically Guided Thoracolumbar/Sacral Pedicle Screws Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided and Computerized Tomography Stealth-Guided Screws

Introduction Pedicle screw insertion is the mainstay of thora­cic and lumbosacral posterior spinal instrumentation. However, it may be associated with complications such as screw mal­positioning. The purpose of this study was to develop a pilot study to compare the accuracy of robot-guided screw ins...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fiani, Brian, Quadri, Syed A, Ramakrishnan, Vivek, Berman, Blake, Khan, Yasir, Siddiqi, Javed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5587408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28924524
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1437
_version_ 1783261983094603776
author Fiani, Brian
Quadri, Syed A
Ramakrishnan, Vivek
Berman, Blake
Khan, Yasir
Siddiqi, Javed
author_facet Fiani, Brian
Quadri, Syed A
Ramakrishnan, Vivek
Berman, Blake
Khan, Yasir
Siddiqi, Javed
author_sort Fiani, Brian
collection PubMed
description Introduction Pedicle screw insertion is the mainstay of thora­cic and lumbosacral posterior spinal instrumentation. However, it may be associated with complications such as screw mal­positioning. The purpose of this study was to develop a pilot study to compare the accuracy of robot-guided screw insertion versus hand-guided screw placement for spinal instrumentation. The hand-guided screws were placed with assistance from computerized tomography (CT) stealth guidance or fluoroscopy. Materials and methods A retrospective analysis of medical records was done for all patients that had pedicle screw insertion for instrumentation between the dates of December 2013 and January 2016 with post-screw placement CT imaging. The analysis was conducted on screw accuracy between the two categories based on the Gertzbein-Robbins classification. Results A total of 49 screws were analyzed for accuracy in six patients. There was no statistically significant difference between the accuracy of hand-placed pedicle screws versus the robotically placed screws (p = 0.311). There was no statistically significant difference in blood loss (p = 0.616), length of procedure (p = 0.192), or post-operative length of stay (p = 0.587). Conclusion The findings of our pilot study agree with most prior studies that there was no statistically significant difference in the accuracy of pedicle screw placement between the two methods of screw placement. Therefore, the techniques are equivocal in accuracy. The new technology (robotic-guidance) is as safe as conventional techniques for screw placement. Just like in any surgery, the technique preference should remain surgeon dependent. The results are only from a small sample size in the development of a pilot study so a strong reliance on the data would not be suggested. The study was a preliminary study that will be used as a template and learning process to create a future prospective study to investigate CT stealth and robotically guided screw placement versus “free hand” guided screws.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5587408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55874082017-09-18 Retrospective Review on Accuracy: A Pilot Study of Robotically Guided Thoracolumbar/Sacral Pedicle Screws Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided and Computerized Tomography Stealth-Guided Screws Fiani, Brian Quadri, Syed A Ramakrishnan, Vivek Berman, Blake Khan, Yasir Siddiqi, Javed Cureus Orthopedics Introduction Pedicle screw insertion is the mainstay of thora­cic and lumbosacral posterior spinal instrumentation. However, it may be associated with complications such as screw mal­positioning. The purpose of this study was to develop a pilot study to compare the accuracy of robot-guided screw insertion versus hand-guided screw placement for spinal instrumentation. The hand-guided screws were placed with assistance from computerized tomography (CT) stealth guidance or fluoroscopy. Materials and methods A retrospective analysis of medical records was done for all patients that had pedicle screw insertion for instrumentation between the dates of December 2013 and January 2016 with post-screw placement CT imaging. The analysis was conducted on screw accuracy between the two categories based on the Gertzbein-Robbins classification. Results A total of 49 screws were analyzed for accuracy in six patients. There was no statistically significant difference between the accuracy of hand-placed pedicle screws versus the robotically placed screws (p = 0.311). There was no statistically significant difference in blood loss (p = 0.616), length of procedure (p = 0.192), or post-operative length of stay (p = 0.587). Conclusion The findings of our pilot study agree with most prior studies that there was no statistically significant difference in the accuracy of pedicle screw placement between the two methods of screw placement. Therefore, the techniques are equivocal in accuracy. The new technology (robotic-guidance) is as safe as conventional techniques for screw placement. Just like in any surgery, the technique preference should remain surgeon dependent. The results are only from a small sample size in the development of a pilot study so a strong reliance on the data would not be suggested. The study was a preliminary study that will be used as a template and learning process to create a future prospective study to investigate CT stealth and robotically guided screw placement versus “free hand” guided screws. Cureus 2017-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5587408/ /pubmed/28924524 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1437 Text en Copyright © 2017, Fiani et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Orthopedics
Fiani, Brian
Quadri, Syed A
Ramakrishnan, Vivek
Berman, Blake
Khan, Yasir
Siddiqi, Javed
Retrospective Review on Accuracy: A Pilot Study of Robotically Guided Thoracolumbar/Sacral Pedicle Screws Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided and Computerized Tomography Stealth-Guided Screws
title Retrospective Review on Accuracy: A Pilot Study of Robotically Guided Thoracolumbar/Sacral Pedicle Screws Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided and Computerized Tomography Stealth-Guided Screws
title_full Retrospective Review on Accuracy: A Pilot Study of Robotically Guided Thoracolumbar/Sacral Pedicle Screws Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided and Computerized Tomography Stealth-Guided Screws
title_fullStr Retrospective Review on Accuracy: A Pilot Study of Robotically Guided Thoracolumbar/Sacral Pedicle Screws Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided and Computerized Tomography Stealth-Guided Screws
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective Review on Accuracy: A Pilot Study of Robotically Guided Thoracolumbar/Sacral Pedicle Screws Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided and Computerized Tomography Stealth-Guided Screws
title_short Retrospective Review on Accuracy: A Pilot Study of Robotically Guided Thoracolumbar/Sacral Pedicle Screws Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided and Computerized Tomography Stealth-Guided Screws
title_sort retrospective review on accuracy: a pilot study of robotically guided thoracolumbar/sacral pedicle screws versus fluoroscopy-guided and computerized tomography stealth-guided screws
topic Orthopedics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5587408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28924524
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1437
work_keys_str_mv AT fianibrian retrospectivereviewonaccuracyapilotstudyofroboticallyguidedthoracolumbarsacralpediclescrewsversusfluoroscopyguidedandcomputerizedtomographystealthguidedscrews
AT quadrisyeda retrospectivereviewonaccuracyapilotstudyofroboticallyguidedthoracolumbarsacralpediclescrewsversusfluoroscopyguidedandcomputerizedtomographystealthguidedscrews
AT ramakrishnanvivek retrospectivereviewonaccuracyapilotstudyofroboticallyguidedthoracolumbarsacralpediclescrewsversusfluoroscopyguidedandcomputerizedtomographystealthguidedscrews
AT bermanblake retrospectivereviewonaccuracyapilotstudyofroboticallyguidedthoracolumbarsacralpediclescrewsversusfluoroscopyguidedandcomputerizedtomographystealthguidedscrews
AT khanyasir retrospectivereviewonaccuracyapilotstudyofroboticallyguidedthoracolumbarsacralpediclescrewsversusfluoroscopyguidedandcomputerizedtomographystealthguidedscrews
AT siddiqijaved retrospectivereviewonaccuracyapilotstudyofroboticallyguidedthoracolumbarsacralpediclescrewsversusfluoroscopyguidedandcomputerizedtomographystealthguidedscrews