Cargando…
The complexity of mating decisions in stalk‐eyed flies
All too often, studies of sexual selection focus exclusively on the responses in one sex, on single traits, typically those that are exaggerated and strongly sexually dimorphic. They ignore a range of less obvious traits and behavior, in both sexes, involved in the interactions leading to mate choic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5587473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28904748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3225 |
_version_ | 1783261988742234112 |
---|---|
author | Chapman, Nadine C. Siriwat, Penthai Howie, James Towlson, Aaron Bellamy, Lawrence Fowler, Kevin Pomiankowski, Andrew |
author_facet | Chapman, Nadine C. Siriwat, Penthai Howie, James Towlson, Aaron Bellamy, Lawrence Fowler, Kevin Pomiankowski, Andrew |
author_sort | Chapman, Nadine C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | All too often, studies of sexual selection focus exclusively on the responses in one sex, on single traits, typically those that are exaggerated and strongly sexually dimorphic. They ignore a range of less obvious traits and behavior, in both sexes, involved in the interactions leading to mate choice. To remedy this imbalance, we analyze a textbook example of sexual selection in the stalk‐eyed fly (Diasemopsis meigenii). We studied several traits in a novel, insightful, and efficient experimental design, examining 2,400 male–female pairs in a “round‐robin” array, where each female was tested against multiple males and vice versa. In D. meigenii, females exhibit strong mate preference for males with highly exaggerated eyespan, and so we deliberately constrained variation in male eyespan to reveal the importance of other traits. Males performing more precopulatory behavior were more likely to attempt to mate with females and be accepted by them. However, behavior was not a necessary part of courtship, as it was absent from over almost half the interactions. Males with larger reproductive organs (testes and accessory glands) did not make more mating attempts, but there was a strong tendency for females to accept mating attempts from such males. How females detect differences in male reproductive organ size remains unclear. In addition, females with larger eyespan, an indicator of size and fecundity, attracted more mating attempts from males, but this trait did not alter female acceptance. Genetic variation among males had a strong influence on male mating attempts and female acceptance, both via the traits we studied and other unmeasured attributes. These findings demonstrate the importance of assaying multiple traits in males and females, rather than focusing solely on prominent and exaggerated sexually dimorphic traits. The approach allows a more complete understanding of the complex mating decisions made by both males and females. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5587473 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55874732017-09-13 The complexity of mating decisions in stalk‐eyed flies Chapman, Nadine C. Siriwat, Penthai Howie, James Towlson, Aaron Bellamy, Lawrence Fowler, Kevin Pomiankowski, Andrew Ecol Evol Original Research All too often, studies of sexual selection focus exclusively on the responses in one sex, on single traits, typically those that are exaggerated and strongly sexually dimorphic. They ignore a range of less obvious traits and behavior, in both sexes, involved in the interactions leading to mate choice. To remedy this imbalance, we analyze a textbook example of sexual selection in the stalk‐eyed fly (Diasemopsis meigenii). We studied several traits in a novel, insightful, and efficient experimental design, examining 2,400 male–female pairs in a “round‐robin” array, where each female was tested against multiple males and vice versa. In D. meigenii, females exhibit strong mate preference for males with highly exaggerated eyespan, and so we deliberately constrained variation in male eyespan to reveal the importance of other traits. Males performing more precopulatory behavior were more likely to attempt to mate with females and be accepted by them. However, behavior was not a necessary part of courtship, as it was absent from over almost half the interactions. Males with larger reproductive organs (testes and accessory glands) did not make more mating attempts, but there was a strong tendency for females to accept mating attempts from such males. How females detect differences in male reproductive organ size remains unclear. In addition, females with larger eyespan, an indicator of size and fecundity, attracted more mating attempts from males, but this trait did not alter female acceptance. Genetic variation among males had a strong influence on male mating attempts and female acceptance, both via the traits we studied and other unmeasured attributes. These findings demonstrate the importance of assaying multiple traits in males and females, rather than focusing solely on prominent and exaggerated sexually dimorphic traits. The approach allows a more complete understanding of the complex mating decisions made by both males and females. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5587473/ /pubmed/28904748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3225 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Chapman, Nadine C. Siriwat, Penthai Howie, James Towlson, Aaron Bellamy, Lawrence Fowler, Kevin Pomiankowski, Andrew The complexity of mating decisions in stalk‐eyed flies |
title | The complexity of mating decisions in stalk‐eyed flies |
title_full | The complexity of mating decisions in stalk‐eyed flies |
title_fullStr | The complexity of mating decisions in stalk‐eyed flies |
title_full_unstemmed | The complexity of mating decisions in stalk‐eyed flies |
title_short | The complexity of mating decisions in stalk‐eyed flies |
title_sort | complexity of mating decisions in stalk‐eyed flies |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5587473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28904748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3225 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chapmannadinec thecomplexityofmatingdecisionsinstalkeyedflies AT siriwatpenthai thecomplexityofmatingdecisionsinstalkeyedflies AT howiejames thecomplexityofmatingdecisionsinstalkeyedflies AT towlsonaaron thecomplexityofmatingdecisionsinstalkeyedflies AT bellamylawrence thecomplexityofmatingdecisionsinstalkeyedflies AT fowlerkevin thecomplexityofmatingdecisionsinstalkeyedflies AT pomiankowskiandrew thecomplexityofmatingdecisionsinstalkeyedflies AT chapmannadinec complexityofmatingdecisionsinstalkeyedflies AT siriwatpenthai complexityofmatingdecisionsinstalkeyedflies AT howiejames complexityofmatingdecisionsinstalkeyedflies AT towlsonaaron complexityofmatingdecisionsinstalkeyedflies AT bellamylawrence complexityofmatingdecisionsinstalkeyedflies AT fowlerkevin complexityofmatingdecisionsinstalkeyedflies AT pomiankowskiandrew complexityofmatingdecisionsinstalkeyedflies |