Cargando…

The complexity of mating decisions in stalk‐eyed flies

All too often, studies of sexual selection focus exclusively on the responses in one sex, on single traits, typically those that are exaggerated and strongly sexually dimorphic. They ignore a range of less obvious traits and behavior, in both sexes, involved in the interactions leading to mate choic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chapman, Nadine C., Siriwat, Penthai, Howie, James, Towlson, Aaron, Bellamy, Lawrence, Fowler, Kevin, Pomiankowski, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5587473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28904748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3225
_version_ 1783261988742234112
author Chapman, Nadine C.
Siriwat, Penthai
Howie, James
Towlson, Aaron
Bellamy, Lawrence
Fowler, Kevin
Pomiankowski, Andrew
author_facet Chapman, Nadine C.
Siriwat, Penthai
Howie, James
Towlson, Aaron
Bellamy, Lawrence
Fowler, Kevin
Pomiankowski, Andrew
author_sort Chapman, Nadine C.
collection PubMed
description All too often, studies of sexual selection focus exclusively on the responses in one sex, on single traits, typically those that are exaggerated and strongly sexually dimorphic. They ignore a range of less obvious traits and behavior, in both sexes, involved in the interactions leading to mate choice. To remedy this imbalance, we analyze a textbook example of sexual selection in the stalk‐eyed fly (Diasemopsis meigenii). We studied several traits in a novel, insightful, and efficient experimental design, examining 2,400 male–female pairs in a “round‐robin” array, where each female was tested against multiple males and vice versa. In D. meigenii, females exhibit strong mate preference for males with highly exaggerated eyespan, and so we deliberately constrained variation in male eyespan to reveal the importance of other traits. Males performing more precopulatory behavior were more likely to attempt to mate with females and be accepted by them. However, behavior was not a necessary part of courtship, as it was absent from over almost half the interactions. Males with larger reproductive organs (testes and accessory glands) did not make more mating attempts, but there was a strong tendency for females to accept mating attempts from such males. How females detect differences in male reproductive organ size remains unclear. In addition, females with larger eyespan, an indicator of size and fecundity, attracted more mating attempts from males, but this trait did not alter female acceptance. Genetic variation among males had a strong influence on male mating attempts and female acceptance, both via the traits we studied and other unmeasured attributes. These findings demonstrate the importance of assaying multiple traits in males and females, rather than focusing solely on prominent and exaggerated sexually dimorphic traits. The approach allows a more complete understanding of the complex mating decisions made by both males and females.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5587473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55874732017-09-13 The complexity of mating decisions in stalk‐eyed flies Chapman, Nadine C. Siriwat, Penthai Howie, James Towlson, Aaron Bellamy, Lawrence Fowler, Kevin Pomiankowski, Andrew Ecol Evol Original Research All too often, studies of sexual selection focus exclusively on the responses in one sex, on single traits, typically those that are exaggerated and strongly sexually dimorphic. They ignore a range of less obvious traits and behavior, in both sexes, involved in the interactions leading to mate choice. To remedy this imbalance, we analyze a textbook example of sexual selection in the stalk‐eyed fly (Diasemopsis meigenii). We studied several traits in a novel, insightful, and efficient experimental design, examining 2,400 male–female pairs in a “round‐robin” array, where each female was tested against multiple males and vice versa. In D. meigenii, females exhibit strong mate preference for males with highly exaggerated eyespan, and so we deliberately constrained variation in male eyespan to reveal the importance of other traits. Males performing more precopulatory behavior were more likely to attempt to mate with females and be accepted by them. However, behavior was not a necessary part of courtship, as it was absent from over almost half the interactions. Males with larger reproductive organs (testes and accessory glands) did not make more mating attempts, but there was a strong tendency for females to accept mating attempts from such males. How females detect differences in male reproductive organ size remains unclear. In addition, females with larger eyespan, an indicator of size and fecundity, attracted more mating attempts from males, but this trait did not alter female acceptance. Genetic variation among males had a strong influence on male mating attempts and female acceptance, both via the traits we studied and other unmeasured attributes. These findings demonstrate the importance of assaying multiple traits in males and females, rather than focusing solely on prominent and exaggerated sexually dimorphic traits. The approach allows a more complete understanding of the complex mating decisions made by both males and females. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5587473/ /pubmed/28904748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3225 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Chapman, Nadine C.
Siriwat, Penthai
Howie, James
Towlson, Aaron
Bellamy, Lawrence
Fowler, Kevin
Pomiankowski, Andrew
The complexity of mating decisions in stalk‐eyed flies
title The complexity of mating decisions in stalk‐eyed flies
title_full The complexity of mating decisions in stalk‐eyed flies
title_fullStr The complexity of mating decisions in stalk‐eyed flies
title_full_unstemmed The complexity of mating decisions in stalk‐eyed flies
title_short The complexity of mating decisions in stalk‐eyed flies
title_sort complexity of mating decisions in stalk‐eyed flies
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5587473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28904748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3225
work_keys_str_mv AT chapmannadinec thecomplexityofmatingdecisionsinstalkeyedflies
AT siriwatpenthai thecomplexityofmatingdecisionsinstalkeyedflies
AT howiejames thecomplexityofmatingdecisionsinstalkeyedflies
AT towlsonaaron thecomplexityofmatingdecisionsinstalkeyedflies
AT bellamylawrence thecomplexityofmatingdecisionsinstalkeyedflies
AT fowlerkevin thecomplexityofmatingdecisionsinstalkeyedflies
AT pomiankowskiandrew thecomplexityofmatingdecisionsinstalkeyedflies
AT chapmannadinec complexityofmatingdecisionsinstalkeyedflies
AT siriwatpenthai complexityofmatingdecisionsinstalkeyedflies
AT howiejames complexityofmatingdecisionsinstalkeyedflies
AT towlsonaaron complexityofmatingdecisionsinstalkeyedflies
AT bellamylawrence complexityofmatingdecisionsinstalkeyedflies
AT fowlerkevin complexityofmatingdecisionsinstalkeyedflies
AT pomiankowskiandrew complexityofmatingdecisionsinstalkeyedflies