Cargando…

Thalidomide and lenalidomide for recurrent ovarian cancer: A systematic review of the literature

The present review aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of thalidomide and lenalidomide, two immunomodulatory drugs with anti-angiogenic properties, in women with recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer. A systematic review of the literature was conducted whereby Medline...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tempfer, Clemens B., Schultheis, Beate, Hilal, Ziad, Dogan, Askin, Rezniczek, Günther A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5587990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28927084
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.6578
_version_ 1783262098272288768
author Tempfer, Clemens B.
Schultheis, Beate
Hilal, Ziad
Dogan, Askin
Rezniczek, Günther A.
author_facet Tempfer, Clemens B.
Schultheis, Beate
Hilal, Ziad
Dogan, Askin
Rezniczek, Günther A.
author_sort Tempfer, Clemens B.
collection PubMed
description The present review aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of thalidomide and lenalidomide, two immunomodulatory drugs with anti-angiogenic properties, in women with recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer. A systematic review of the literature was conducted whereby Medline and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched using terms associated with thalidomide, lenalidomide, and recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer. Published English language case reports, trials and studies that described the safety and efficacy of thalidomide or lenalidomide alone, or in combination with other drugs were reviewed. A total of 16 clinical studies involving 394 patients treated with thalidomide (n=188), lenalidomide (n=77) and 129 controls were identified, including five case reports (n=6), three case series (n=45), two phase I trials (n=27), four phase II trials (n=109), and two randomized phase III trials (n=207). In a pooled analysis of thalidomide investigated as a single drug, the overall clinical benefit rate was 43% (43/99) with a mean time to progression of 5.6 months. The response rate (complete response + partial response) was 25%. In a phase III trial, the combination of thalidomide and topotecan significantly increased the overall response rate compared with topotecan alone [14/30 (47%) vs. 8/39 (21%)]. In another phase III trial involving women with asymptomatic biochemical recurrence, compared with tamoxifen, thalidomide was not more effective. Lenalidomide was investigated in three phase I trials and in one phase II trial with an overall clinical benefit rate of 52% (34/65), and a mean time to progression of 4.6 months. The response rate (complete response + partial response) was 6%. Systemic toxicity of both drugs was noted in >77% of patients with pneumonitis/pneumonia, fatigue, neuropathy and venous thromboembolism reported as the most common side effects. Thalidomide and lenalidomide are moderately active in recurrent ovarian cancer. Thalidomide possesses synergistic effects with topotecan. The toxicity of both drugs is considerable and there is a greater amount of data available for thalidomide compared to lenalidomide.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5587990
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55879902017-09-18 Thalidomide and lenalidomide for recurrent ovarian cancer: A systematic review of the literature Tempfer, Clemens B. Schultheis, Beate Hilal, Ziad Dogan, Askin Rezniczek, Günther A. Oncol Lett Articles The present review aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of thalidomide and lenalidomide, two immunomodulatory drugs with anti-angiogenic properties, in women with recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer. A systematic review of the literature was conducted whereby Medline and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched using terms associated with thalidomide, lenalidomide, and recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer. Published English language case reports, trials and studies that described the safety and efficacy of thalidomide or lenalidomide alone, or in combination with other drugs were reviewed. A total of 16 clinical studies involving 394 patients treated with thalidomide (n=188), lenalidomide (n=77) and 129 controls were identified, including five case reports (n=6), three case series (n=45), two phase I trials (n=27), four phase II trials (n=109), and two randomized phase III trials (n=207). In a pooled analysis of thalidomide investigated as a single drug, the overall clinical benefit rate was 43% (43/99) with a mean time to progression of 5.6 months. The response rate (complete response + partial response) was 25%. In a phase III trial, the combination of thalidomide and topotecan significantly increased the overall response rate compared with topotecan alone [14/30 (47%) vs. 8/39 (21%)]. In another phase III trial involving women with asymptomatic biochemical recurrence, compared with tamoxifen, thalidomide was not more effective. Lenalidomide was investigated in three phase I trials and in one phase II trial with an overall clinical benefit rate of 52% (34/65), and a mean time to progression of 4.6 months. The response rate (complete response + partial response) was 6%. Systemic toxicity of both drugs was noted in >77% of patients with pneumonitis/pneumonia, fatigue, neuropathy and venous thromboembolism reported as the most common side effects. Thalidomide and lenalidomide are moderately active in recurrent ovarian cancer. Thalidomide possesses synergistic effects with topotecan. The toxicity of both drugs is considerable and there is a greater amount of data available for thalidomide compared to lenalidomide. D.A. Spandidos 2017-09 2017-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5587990/ /pubmed/28927084 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.6578 Text en Copyright: © Tempfer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Tempfer, Clemens B.
Schultheis, Beate
Hilal, Ziad
Dogan, Askin
Rezniczek, Günther A.
Thalidomide and lenalidomide for recurrent ovarian cancer: A systematic review of the literature
title Thalidomide and lenalidomide for recurrent ovarian cancer: A systematic review of the literature
title_full Thalidomide and lenalidomide for recurrent ovarian cancer: A systematic review of the literature
title_fullStr Thalidomide and lenalidomide for recurrent ovarian cancer: A systematic review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Thalidomide and lenalidomide for recurrent ovarian cancer: A systematic review of the literature
title_short Thalidomide and lenalidomide for recurrent ovarian cancer: A systematic review of the literature
title_sort thalidomide and lenalidomide for recurrent ovarian cancer: a systematic review of the literature
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5587990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28927084
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.6578
work_keys_str_mv AT tempferclemensb thalidomideandlenalidomideforrecurrentovariancancerasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT schultheisbeate thalidomideandlenalidomideforrecurrentovariancancerasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT hilalziad thalidomideandlenalidomideforrecurrentovariancancerasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT doganaskin thalidomideandlenalidomideforrecurrentovariancancerasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT rezniczekgunthera thalidomideandlenalidomideforrecurrentovariancancerasystematicreviewoftheliterature