Cargando…

Should Surgical Burs Be Used as Single-Use Devices to Avoid Cross Infection? A Case-Control Study

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the rate of bacterial contamination of reused and new unused burs after different sterilization sessions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The test group consisted of 40 used fissure burs, and the control group of 40 unused new fissure burs (tot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Jandan, Badr A., Ahmed, Mohamed Gafar, Al-Khalifa, Khalifa Sulaiman, Farooq, Imran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5588341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26535887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000442166
_version_ 1783262159694725120
author Al-Jandan, Badr A.
Ahmed, Mohamed Gafar
Al-Khalifa, Khalifa Sulaiman
Farooq, Imran
author_facet Al-Jandan, Badr A.
Ahmed, Mohamed Gafar
Al-Khalifa, Khalifa Sulaiman
Farooq, Imran
author_sort Al-Jandan, Badr A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the rate of bacterial contamination of reused and new unused burs after different sterilization sessions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The test group consisted of 40 used fissure burs, and the control group of 40 unused new fissure burs (total n = 80). The burs from both groups were precleaned according to standard protocols and then subjected to two sterilization sessions (high- and low-steam pressure autoclaving). After each sterilization session, the burs were transferred into incubation tubes which contained thioglycollate culture medium and were monitored daily for a period of 48 h to detect any bacterial growth. Data were collected and statistical analysis was done using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Of the 40 burs of the test group, 2 burs (5%) showed positive bacterial growth, whereas no bur from the control group showed any sign of bacterial growth after high-pressure autoclaving. The colony structure and Gram staining were compatible with the growth of Staphylococcus epidermis. After a second sterilization session at low-pressure steam autoclaving, no bacterial growth was observed for the test group, but 1 bur (2.5%) from the control group showed bacterial growth and Gram-positive staining matched well with the growth of Brevibacterium species. CONCLUSIONS: The new and unused burs were 100% sterile after high-pressure steam autoclaving, whereas 5% of the reused burs appeared positive with bacterial contamination. After low-pressure steam autoclaving, reused burs were 100% sterile, but 1 new bur demonstrated bacterial contamination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5588341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher S. Karger AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55883412017-11-01 Should Surgical Burs Be Used as Single-Use Devices to Avoid Cross Infection? A Case-Control Study Al-Jandan, Badr A. Ahmed, Mohamed Gafar Al-Khalifa, Khalifa Sulaiman Farooq, Imran Med Princ Pract Original Paper OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the rate of bacterial contamination of reused and new unused burs after different sterilization sessions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The test group consisted of 40 used fissure burs, and the control group of 40 unused new fissure burs (total n = 80). The burs from both groups were precleaned according to standard protocols and then subjected to two sterilization sessions (high- and low-steam pressure autoclaving). After each sterilization session, the burs were transferred into incubation tubes which contained thioglycollate culture medium and were monitored daily for a period of 48 h to detect any bacterial growth. Data were collected and statistical analysis was done using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Of the 40 burs of the test group, 2 burs (5%) showed positive bacterial growth, whereas no bur from the control group showed any sign of bacterial growth after high-pressure autoclaving. The colony structure and Gram staining were compatible with the growth of Staphylococcus epidermis. After a second sterilization session at low-pressure steam autoclaving, no bacterial growth was observed for the test group, but 1 bur (2.5%) from the control group showed bacterial growth and Gram-positive staining matched well with the growth of Brevibacterium species. CONCLUSIONS: The new and unused burs were 100% sterile after high-pressure steam autoclaving, whereas 5% of the reused burs appeared positive with bacterial contamination. After low-pressure steam autoclaving, reused burs were 100% sterile, but 1 new bur demonstrated bacterial contamination. S. Karger AG 2016-02 2015-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5588341/ /pubmed/26535887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000442166 Text en Copyright © 2015 by S. Karger AG, Basel http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported license (CC BY-NC) (www.karger.com/OA-license), applicable to the online version of the article only. Distribution permitted for non-commercial purposes only.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Al-Jandan, Badr A.
Ahmed, Mohamed Gafar
Al-Khalifa, Khalifa Sulaiman
Farooq, Imran
Should Surgical Burs Be Used as Single-Use Devices to Avoid Cross Infection? A Case-Control Study
title Should Surgical Burs Be Used as Single-Use Devices to Avoid Cross Infection? A Case-Control Study
title_full Should Surgical Burs Be Used as Single-Use Devices to Avoid Cross Infection? A Case-Control Study
title_fullStr Should Surgical Burs Be Used as Single-Use Devices to Avoid Cross Infection? A Case-Control Study
title_full_unstemmed Should Surgical Burs Be Used as Single-Use Devices to Avoid Cross Infection? A Case-Control Study
title_short Should Surgical Burs Be Used as Single-Use Devices to Avoid Cross Infection? A Case-Control Study
title_sort should surgical burs be used as single-use devices to avoid cross infection? a case-control study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5588341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26535887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000442166
work_keys_str_mv AT aljandanbadra shouldsurgicalbursbeusedassingleusedevicestoavoidcrossinfectionacasecontrolstudy
AT ahmedmohamedgafar shouldsurgicalbursbeusedassingleusedevicestoavoidcrossinfectionacasecontrolstudy
AT alkhalifakhalifasulaiman shouldsurgicalbursbeusedassingleusedevicestoavoidcrossinfectionacasecontrolstudy
AT farooqimran shouldsurgicalbursbeusedassingleusedevicestoavoidcrossinfectionacasecontrolstudy