Cargando…

A protocol for a randomised controlled trial of the bone response to impact loading or resistance training in young women with lower than average bone mass: the OPTIMA-Ex trial

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the Osteoporosis Prevention Through Impact and Muscle-loading Approaches to Exercise trial is to compare the bone response to two known osteogenic stimuli — impact loading exercise and resistance training. Specifically, we will examine the effect of a 10-month, twice-weekly,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lambert, Conor, Beck, Belinda R, Harding, Amy T, Watson, Steven L, Weeks, Benjamin K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5588984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28864705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016983
_version_ 1783262259854704640
author Lambert, Conor
Beck, Belinda R
Harding, Amy T
Watson, Steven L
Weeks, Benjamin K
author_facet Lambert, Conor
Beck, Belinda R
Harding, Amy T
Watson, Steven L
Weeks, Benjamin K
author_sort Lambert, Conor
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of the Osteoporosis Prevention Through Impact and Muscle-loading Approaches to Exercise trial is to compare the bone response to two known osteogenic stimuli — impact loading exercise and resistance training. Specifically, we will examine the effect of a 10-month, twice-weekly, high-intensity impact loading exercise intervention and a 10-month, twice-weekly, high-intensity resistance training intervention on bone mass and strength at clinically important skeletal sites. The intervention groups will be compared against a home-based ‘positive’ control group. Safety and acceptability of each exercise modality will also be determined. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Sedentary otherwise healthy young women aged 18–30 years with bone mineral density (BMD) T-scores less than or equal to 0 at the hip and lumbar spine, screened for conditions and medications that influence bone and physical function, will be recruited. Eligible participants are randomised to 10-month, twice-weekly, either supervised high-intensity impact training, high-intensity resistance training or a home-based ‘positive’ control group. The primary outcome measure will be lumbar spine areal BMD, while secondary outcome measures will include: whole body, femoral neck and regional measures (upper and lower limb) of bone, muscle and fat; anthropometrics; muscle strength and power; quality of life and exercise safety, enjoyment and acceptability. All outcome measures will be conducted at baseline (T0) and 10 months (T10) and will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle and per protocol. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been granted ethical approval from the Griffith University Human Research Ethics Committee (GU Ref: 2015/775). Standard scientific reporting practices will occur, including publication in peer-reviewed journals. Participant confidentiality will be maintained in all forms of reporting. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12616001444471.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5588984
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55889842017-09-14 A protocol for a randomised controlled trial of the bone response to impact loading or resistance training in young women with lower than average bone mass: the OPTIMA-Ex trial Lambert, Conor Beck, Belinda R Harding, Amy T Watson, Steven L Weeks, Benjamin K BMJ Open Sports and Exercise Medicine INTRODUCTION: The aim of the Osteoporosis Prevention Through Impact and Muscle-loading Approaches to Exercise trial is to compare the bone response to two known osteogenic stimuli — impact loading exercise and resistance training. Specifically, we will examine the effect of a 10-month, twice-weekly, high-intensity impact loading exercise intervention and a 10-month, twice-weekly, high-intensity resistance training intervention on bone mass and strength at clinically important skeletal sites. The intervention groups will be compared against a home-based ‘positive’ control group. Safety and acceptability of each exercise modality will also be determined. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Sedentary otherwise healthy young women aged 18–30 years with bone mineral density (BMD) T-scores less than or equal to 0 at the hip and lumbar spine, screened for conditions and medications that influence bone and physical function, will be recruited. Eligible participants are randomised to 10-month, twice-weekly, either supervised high-intensity impact training, high-intensity resistance training or a home-based ‘positive’ control group. The primary outcome measure will be lumbar spine areal BMD, while secondary outcome measures will include: whole body, femoral neck and regional measures (upper and lower limb) of bone, muscle and fat; anthropometrics; muscle strength and power; quality of life and exercise safety, enjoyment and acceptability. All outcome measures will be conducted at baseline (T0) and 10 months (T10) and will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle and per protocol. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been granted ethical approval from the Griffith University Human Research Ethics Committee (GU Ref: 2015/775). Standard scientific reporting practices will occur, including publication in peer-reviewed journals. Participant confidentiality will be maintained in all forms of reporting. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12616001444471. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5588984/ /pubmed/28864705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016983 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Sports and Exercise Medicine
Lambert, Conor
Beck, Belinda R
Harding, Amy T
Watson, Steven L
Weeks, Benjamin K
A protocol for a randomised controlled trial of the bone response to impact loading or resistance training in young women with lower than average bone mass: the OPTIMA-Ex trial
title A protocol for a randomised controlled trial of the bone response to impact loading or resistance training in young women with lower than average bone mass: the OPTIMA-Ex trial
title_full A protocol for a randomised controlled trial of the bone response to impact loading or resistance training in young women with lower than average bone mass: the OPTIMA-Ex trial
title_fullStr A protocol for a randomised controlled trial of the bone response to impact loading or resistance training in young women with lower than average bone mass: the OPTIMA-Ex trial
title_full_unstemmed A protocol for a randomised controlled trial of the bone response to impact loading or resistance training in young women with lower than average bone mass: the OPTIMA-Ex trial
title_short A protocol for a randomised controlled trial of the bone response to impact loading or resistance training in young women with lower than average bone mass: the OPTIMA-Ex trial
title_sort protocol for a randomised controlled trial of the bone response to impact loading or resistance training in young women with lower than average bone mass: the optima-ex trial
topic Sports and Exercise Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5588984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28864705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016983
work_keys_str_mv AT lambertconor aprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheboneresponsetoimpactloadingorresistancetraininginyoungwomenwithlowerthanaveragebonemasstheoptimaextrial
AT beckbelindar aprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheboneresponsetoimpactloadingorresistancetraininginyoungwomenwithlowerthanaveragebonemasstheoptimaextrial
AT hardingamyt aprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheboneresponsetoimpactloadingorresistancetraininginyoungwomenwithlowerthanaveragebonemasstheoptimaextrial
AT watsonstevenl aprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheboneresponsetoimpactloadingorresistancetraininginyoungwomenwithlowerthanaveragebonemasstheoptimaextrial
AT weeksbenjamink aprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheboneresponsetoimpactloadingorresistancetraininginyoungwomenwithlowerthanaveragebonemasstheoptimaextrial
AT lambertconor protocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheboneresponsetoimpactloadingorresistancetraininginyoungwomenwithlowerthanaveragebonemasstheoptimaextrial
AT beckbelindar protocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheboneresponsetoimpactloadingorresistancetraininginyoungwomenwithlowerthanaveragebonemasstheoptimaextrial
AT hardingamyt protocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheboneresponsetoimpactloadingorresistancetraininginyoungwomenwithlowerthanaveragebonemasstheoptimaextrial
AT watsonstevenl protocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheboneresponsetoimpactloadingorresistancetraininginyoungwomenwithlowerthanaveragebonemasstheoptimaextrial
AT weeksbenjamink protocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheboneresponsetoimpactloadingorresistancetraininginyoungwomenwithlowerthanaveragebonemasstheoptimaextrial