Cargando…
A review of rate control in atrial fibrillation, and the rationale and protocol for the RATE-AF trial
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common and causes impaired quality of life, an increased risk of stroke and death as well as frequent hospital admissions. The majority of patients with AF require control of heart rate. In this article, we summarise the limited evidence from cli...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5588987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28729311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015099 |
_version_ | 1783262260544667648 |
---|---|
author | Kotecha, Dipak Calvert, Melanie Deeks, Jonathan J Griffith, Michael Kirchhof, Paulus Lip, Gregory YH Mehta, Samir Slinn, Gemma Stanbury, Mary Steeds, Richard P Townend, Jonathan N |
author_facet | Kotecha, Dipak Calvert, Melanie Deeks, Jonathan J Griffith, Michael Kirchhof, Paulus Lip, Gregory YH Mehta, Samir Slinn, Gemma Stanbury, Mary Steeds, Richard P Townend, Jonathan N |
author_sort | Kotecha, Dipak |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common and causes impaired quality of life, an increased risk of stroke and death as well as frequent hospital admissions. The majority of patients with AF require control of heart rate. In this article, we summarise the limited evidence from clinical trials that guides prescription, and present the rationale and protocol for a new randomised trial. As rate control has not yet been shown to reduce mortality, there is a clear need to compare the impact of therapy on quality of life, cardiac function and exercise capacity. Such a trial should concentrate on the long-term effects of treatment in the largest proportion of patients with AF, those with symptomatic permanent AF, with the aim of improving patient well-being. DESIGN AND INTERVENTION: The RAte control Therapy Evaluation in permanent Atrial Fibrillation (RATE-AF) trial will enrol 160 participants with a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded end point design comparing initial rate control with digoxin or bisoprolol. This will be the first head-to-head randomised trial of digoxin and beta-blockers in AF. PARTICIPANTS: Recruited patients will be aged ≥60 years with permanent AF and symptoms of breathlessness (equivalent to New York Heart Association class II or above), with few exclusion criteria to maximise generalisability to routine clinical practice. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome is patient-reported quality of life, with secondary outcomes including echocardiographic ventricular function, exercise capacity and biomarkers of cellular and clinical response. Follow-up will occur at 6 and 12 months, with feasibility components to inform the design of a future trial powered to detect a difference in hospital admission. The RATE-AF trial will underpin an integrated approach to management including biomarkers, functions and symptoms that will guide future research into optimal, personalised rate control in patients with AF. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: East Midlands-Derby Research Ethics Committee (16/EM/0178); peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02391337; ISRCTN: 95259705. Pre-results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5588987 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55889872017-09-14 A review of rate control in atrial fibrillation, and the rationale and protocol for the RATE-AF trial Kotecha, Dipak Calvert, Melanie Deeks, Jonathan J Griffith, Michael Kirchhof, Paulus Lip, Gregory YH Mehta, Samir Slinn, Gemma Stanbury, Mary Steeds, Richard P Townend, Jonathan N BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common and causes impaired quality of life, an increased risk of stroke and death as well as frequent hospital admissions. The majority of patients with AF require control of heart rate. In this article, we summarise the limited evidence from clinical trials that guides prescription, and present the rationale and protocol for a new randomised trial. As rate control has not yet been shown to reduce mortality, there is a clear need to compare the impact of therapy on quality of life, cardiac function and exercise capacity. Such a trial should concentrate on the long-term effects of treatment in the largest proportion of patients with AF, those with symptomatic permanent AF, with the aim of improving patient well-being. DESIGN AND INTERVENTION: The RAte control Therapy Evaluation in permanent Atrial Fibrillation (RATE-AF) trial will enrol 160 participants with a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded end point design comparing initial rate control with digoxin or bisoprolol. This will be the first head-to-head randomised trial of digoxin and beta-blockers in AF. PARTICIPANTS: Recruited patients will be aged ≥60 years with permanent AF and symptoms of breathlessness (equivalent to New York Heart Association class II or above), with few exclusion criteria to maximise generalisability to routine clinical practice. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome is patient-reported quality of life, with secondary outcomes including echocardiographic ventricular function, exercise capacity and biomarkers of cellular and clinical response. Follow-up will occur at 6 and 12 months, with feasibility components to inform the design of a future trial powered to detect a difference in hospital admission. The RATE-AF trial will underpin an integrated approach to management including biomarkers, functions and symptoms that will guide future research into optimal, personalised rate control in patients with AF. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: East Midlands-Derby Research Ethics Committee (16/EM/0178); peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02391337; ISRCTN: 95259705. Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5588987/ /pubmed/28729311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015099 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Kotecha, Dipak Calvert, Melanie Deeks, Jonathan J Griffith, Michael Kirchhof, Paulus Lip, Gregory YH Mehta, Samir Slinn, Gemma Stanbury, Mary Steeds, Richard P Townend, Jonathan N A review of rate control in atrial fibrillation, and the rationale and protocol for the RATE-AF trial |
title | A review of rate control in atrial fibrillation, and the rationale and protocol for the RATE-AF trial |
title_full | A review of rate control in atrial fibrillation, and the rationale and protocol for the RATE-AF trial |
title_fullStr | A review of rate control in atrial fibrillation, and the rationale and protocol for the RATE-AF trial |
title_full_unstemmed | A review of rate control in atrial fibrillation, and the rationale and protocol for the RATE-AF trial |
title_short | A review of rate control in atrial fibrillation, and the rationale and protocol for the RATE-AF trial |
title_sort | review of rate control in atrial fibrillation, and the rationale and protocol for the rate-af trial |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5588987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28729311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015099 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kotechadipak areviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial AT calvertmelanie areviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial AT deeksjonathanj areviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial AT griffithmichael areviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial AT kirchhofpaulus areviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial AT lipgregoryyh areviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial AT mehtasamir areviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial AT slinngemma areviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial AT stanburymary areviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial AT steedsrichardp areviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial AT townendjonathann areviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial AT kotechadipak reviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial AT calvertmelanie reviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial AT deeksjonathanj reviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial AT griffithmichael reviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial AT kirchhofpaulus reviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial AT lipgregoryyh reviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial AT mehtasamir reviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial AT slinngemma reviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial AT stanburymary reviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial AT steedsrichardp reviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial AT townendjonathann reviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial |