Cargando…

A review of rate control in atrial fibrillation, and the rationale and protocol for the RATE-AF trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common and causes impaired quality of life, an increased risk of stroke and death as well as frequent hospital admissions. The majority of patients with AF require control of heart rate. In this article, we summarise the limited evidence from cli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kotecha, Dipak, Calvert, Melanie, Deeks, Jonathan J, Griffith, Michael, Kirchhof, Paulus, Lip, Gregory YH, Mehta, Samir, Slinn, Gemma, Stanbury, Mary, Steeds, Richard P, Townend, Jonathan N
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5588987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28729311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015099
_version_ 1783262260544667648
author Kotecha, Dipak
Calvert, Melanie
Deeks, Jonathan J
Griffith, Michael
Kirchhof, Paulus
Lip, Gregory YH
Mehta, Samir
Slinn, Gemma
Stanbury, Mary
Steeds, Richard P
Townend, Jonathan N
author_facet Kotecha, Dipak
Calvert, Melanie
Deeks, Jonathan J
Griffith, Michael
Kirchhof, Paulus
Lip, Gregory YH
Mehta, Samir
Slinn, Gemma
Stanbury, Mary
Steeds, Richard P
Townend, Jonathan N
author_sort Kotecha, Dipak
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common and causes impaired quality of life, an increased risk of stroke and death as well as frequent hospital admissions. The majority of patients with AF require control of heart rate. In this article, we summarise the limited evidence from clinical trials that guides prescription, and present the rationale and protocol for a new randomised trial. As rate control has not yet been shown to reduce mortality, there is a clear need to compare the impact of therapy on quality of life, cardiac function and exercise capacity. Such a trial should concentrate on the long-term effects of treatment in the largest proportion of patients with AF, those with symptomatic permanent AF, with the aim of improving patient well-being. DESIGN AND INTERVENTION: The RAte control Therapy Evaluation in permanent Atrial Fibrillation (RATE-AF) trial will enrol 160 participants with a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded end point design comparing initial rate control with digoxin or bisoprolol. This will be the first head-to-head randomised trial of digoxin and beta-blockers in AF. PARTICIPANTS: Recruited patients will be aged ≥60 years with permanent AF and symptoms of breathlessness (equivalent to New York Heart Association class II or above), with few exclusion criteria to maximise generalisability to routine clinical practice. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome is patient-reported quality of life, with secondary outcomes including echocardiographic ventricular function, exercise capacity and biomarkers of cellular and clinical response. Follow-up will occur at 6 and 12 months, with feasibility components to inform the design of a future trial powered to detect a difference in hospital admission. The RATE-AF trial will underpin an integrated approach to management including biomarkers, functions and symptoms that will guide future research into optimal, personalised rate control in patients with AF. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: East Midlands-Derby Research Ethics Committee (16/EM/0178); peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02391337; ISRCTN: 95259705. Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5588987
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55889872017-09-14 A review of rate control in atrial fibrillation, and the rationale and protocol for the RATE-AF trial Kotecha, Dipak Calvert, Melanie Deeks, Jonathan J Griffith, Michael Kirchhof, Paulus Lip, Gregory YH Mehta, Samir Slinn, Gemma Stanbury, Mary Steeds, Richard P Townend, Jonathan N BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common and causes impaired quality of life, an increased risk of stroke and death as well as frequent hospital admissions. The majority of patients with AF require control of heart rate. In this article, we summarise the limited evidence from clinical trials that guides prescription, and present the rationale and protocol for a new randomised trial. As rate control has not yet been shown to reduce mortality, there is a clear need to compare the impact of therapy on quality of life, cardiac function and exercise capacity. Such a trial should concentrate on the long-term effects of treatment in the largest proportion of patients with AF, those with symptomatic permanent AF, with the aim of improving patient well-being. DESIGN AND INTERVENTION: The RAte control Therapy Evaluation in permanent Atrial Fibrillation (RATE-AF) trial will enrol 160 participants with a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded end point design comparing initial rate control with digoxin or bisoprolol. This will be the first head-to-head randomised trial of digoxin and beta-blockers in AF. PARTICIPANTS: Recruited patients will be aged ≥60 years with permanent AF and symptoms of breathlessness (equivalent to New York Heart Association class II or above), with few exclusion criteria to maximise generalisability to routine clinical practice. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome is patient-reported quality of life, with secondary outcomes including echocardiographic ventricular function, exercise capacity and biomarkers of cellular and clinical response. Follow-up will occur at 6 and 12 months, with feasibility components to inform the design of a future trial powered to detect a difference in hospital admission. The RATE-AF trial will underpin an integrated approach to management including biomarkers, functions and symptoms that will guide future research into optimal, personalised rate control in patients with AF. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: East Midlands-Derby Research Ethics Committee (16/EM/0178); peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02391337; ISRCTN: 95259705. Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5588987/ /pubmed/28729311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015099 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Kotecha, Dipak
Calvert, Melanie
Deeks, Jonathan J
Griffith, Michael
Kirchhof, Paulus
Lip, Gregory YH
Mehta, Samir
Slinn, Gemma
Stanbury, Mary
Steeds, Richard P
Townend, Jonathan N
A review of rate control in atrial fibrillation, and the rationale and protocol for the RATE-AF trial
title A review of rate control in atrial fibrillation, and the rationale and protocol for the RATE-AF trial
title_full A review of rate control in atrial fibrillation, and the rationale and protocol for the RATE-AF trial
title_fullStr A review of rate control in atrial fibrillation, and the rationale and protocol for the RATE-AF trial
title_full_unstemmed A review of rate control in atrial fibrillation, and the rationale and protocol for the RATE-AF trial
title_short A review of rate control in atrial fibrillation, and the rationale and protocol for the RATE-AF trial
title_sort review of rate control in atrial fibrillation, and the rationale and protocol for the rate-af trial
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5588987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28729311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015099
work_keys_str_mv AT kotechadipak areviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial
AT calvertmelanie areviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial
AT deeksjonathanj areviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial
AT griffithmichael areviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial
AT kirchhofpaulus areviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial
AT lipgregoryyh areviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial
AT mehtasamir areviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial
AT slinngemma areviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial
AT stanburymary areviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial
AT steedsrichardp areviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial
AT townendjonathann areviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial
AT kotechadipak reviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial
AT calvertmelanie reviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial
AT deeksjonathanj reviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial
AT griffithmichael reviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial
AT kirchhofpaulus reviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial
AT lipgregoryyh reviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial
AT mehtasamir reviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial
AT slinngemma reviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial
AT stanburymary reviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial
AT steedsrichardp reviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial
AT townendjonathann reviewofratecontrolinatrialfibrillationandtherationaleandprotocolfortherateaftrial