Cargando…

Effects of complex interventions in ‘skin cancer prevention and treatment’: protocol for a mixed-method systematic review with qualitative comparative analysis

INTRODUCTION: Occurring from ultraviolet radiation combined with impairing ozone levels, uncritical sun exposure and use of tanning beds an increasing number of people are affected by different types of skin cancer. But preventive interventions like skin cancer screening are still missing the eviden...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beifus, Karolina, Breitbart, Eckhard, Köberlein-Neu, Juliane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5588993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28877950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017196
_version_ 1783262261949759488
author Beifus, Karolina
Breitbart, Eckhard
Köberlein-Neu, Juliane
author_facet Beifus, Karolina
Breitbart, Eckhard
Köberlein-Neu, Juliane
author_sort Beifus, Karolina
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Occurring from ultraviolet radiation combined with impairing ozone levels, uncritical sun exposure and use of tanning beds an increasing number of people are affected by different types of skin cancer. But preventive interventions like skin cancer screening are still missing the evidence for effectiveness and therefore are criticised. Fundamental for an appropriate course of action is to approach the defined parameters as measures for effectiveness critically. A prerequisite should be the critical application of used parameter that are defined as measures for effectiveness. This research seeks to establish, through the available literature, the effects and conditions that prove the effectiveness of prevention strategies in skin cancer. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: A mixed-method approach is employed to combine quantitative to qualitative methods and answer what effects can display effectiveness considering time horizon, perspective and organisational level and what are essential and sufficient conditions to prove effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in skin cancer prevention strategies. A systematic review will be performed to spot studies from any design and assess the data quantitatively and qualitatively. Included studies from each key question will be summarised by characteristics like population, intervention, comparison, outcomes, study design, endpoints, effect estimator and so on. Beside statistical relevancies for a systematic review the qualitative method of qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) will be performed. The estimated outcomes from this review and QCA are the accomplishment and absence of effects that are appropriate for application in effectiveness assessments and further cost-effectiveness assessment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal ethical approval is not required as primary data will not be collected. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews number CRD42017053859.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5588993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55889932017-09-14 Effects of complex interventions in ‘skin cancer prevention and treatment’: protocol for a mixed-method systematic review with qualitative comparative analysis Beifus, Karolina Breitbart, Eckhard Köberlein-Neu, Juliane BMJ Open Public Health INTRODUCTION: Occurring from ultraviolet radiation combined with impairing ozone levels, uncritical sun exposure and use of tanning beds an increasing number of people are affected by different types of skin cancer. But preventive interventions like skin cancer screening are still missing the evidence for effectiveness and therefore are criticised. Fundamental for an appropriate course of action is to approach the defined parameters as measures for effectiveness critically. A prerequisite should be the critical application of used parameter that are defined as measures for effectiveness. This research seeks to establish, through the available literature, the effects and conditions that prove the effectiveness of prevention strategies in skin cancer. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: A mixed-method approach is employed to combine quantitative to qualitative methods and answer what effects can display effectiveness considering time horizon, perspective and organisational level and what are essential and sufficient conditions to prove effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in skin cancer prevention strategies. A systematic review will be performed to spot studies from any design and assess the data quantitatively and qualitatively. Included studies from each key question will be summarised by characteristics like population, intervention, comparison, outcomes, study design, endpoints, effect estimator and so on. Beside statistical relevancies for a systematic review the qualitative method of qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) will be performed. The estimated outcomes from this review and QCA are the accomplishment and absence of effects that are appropriate for application in effectiveness assessments and further cost-effectiveness assessment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal ethical approval is not required as primary data will not be collected. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews number CRD42017053859. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5588993/ /pubmed/28877950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017196 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Public Health
Beifus, Karolina
Breitbart, Eckhard
Köberlein-Neu, Juliane
Effects of complex interventions in ‘skin cancer prevention and treatment’: protocol for a mixed-method systematic review with qualitative comparative analysis
title Effects of complex interventions in ‘skin cancer prevention and treatment’: protocol for a mixed-method systematic review with qualitative comparative analysis
title_full Effects of complex interventions in ‘skin cancer prevention and treatment’: protocol for a mixed-method systematic review with qualitative comparative analysis
title_fullStr Effects of complex interventions in ‘skin cancer prevention and treatment’: protocol for a mixed-method systematic review with qualitative comparative analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effects of complex interventions in ‘skin cancer prevention and treatment’: protocol for a mixed-method systematic review with qualitative comparative analysis
title_short Effects of complex interventions in ‘skin cancer prevention and treatment’: protocol for a mixed-method systematic review with qualitative comparative analysis
title_sort effects of complex interventions in ‘skin cancer prevention and treatment’: protocol for a mixed-method systematic review with qualitative comparative analysis
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5588993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28877950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017196
work_keys_str_mv AT beifuskarolina effectsofcomplexinterventionsinskincancerpreventionandtreatmentprotocolforamixedmethodsystematicreviewwithqualitativecomparativeanalysis
AT breitbarteckhard effectsofcomplexinterventionsinskincancerpreventionandtreatmentprotocolforamixedmethodsystematicreviewwithqualitativecomparativeanalysis
AT koberleinneujuliane effectsofcomplexinterventionsinskincancerpreventionandtreatmentprotocolforamixedmethodsystematicreviewwithqualitativecomparativeanalysis