Cargando…
Effects of external inspection on sepsis detection and treatment: a study protocol for a quasiexperimental study with a stepped-wedge design
INTRODUCTION: Inspections are widely used in health care as a means to improve the health services delivered to patients. Despite their widespread use, there is little evidence of their effect. The mechanisms for how inspections can promote change are poorly understood. In this study, we use a natio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5589010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28877944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016213 |
_version_ | 1783262265703661568 |
---|---|
author | Hovlid, Einar Frich, Jan C Walshe, Kieran Nilsen, Roy M Flaatten, Hans Kristian Braut, Geir Sverre Helgeland, Jon Teig, Inger Lise Harthug, Stig |
author_facet | Hovlid, Einar Frich, Jan C Walshe, Kieran Nilsen, Roy M Flaatten, Hans Kristian Braut, Geir Sverre Helgeland, Jon Teig, Inger Lise Harthug, Stig |
author_sort | Hovlid, Einar |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Inspections are widely used in health care as a means to improve the health services delivered to patients. Despite their widespread use, there is little evidence of their effect. The mechanisms for how inspections can promote change are poorly understood. In this study, we use a national inspection campaign of sepsis detection and initial treatment in hospitals as case to: (1) Explore how inspections affect the involved organizations. (2) Evaluate what effect external inspections have on the process of delivering care to patients, measured by change in indicators reflecting how sepsis detection and treatment is carried out. (3) Evaluate whether external inspections affect patient outcomes, measured as change in the 30-day mortality rate and length of hospital stay. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The intervention that we study is inspections of sepsis detection and treatment in hospitals. The intervention will be rolled out sequentially during 12 months to 24 hospitals. Our effect measures are change on indicators related to the detection and treatment of sepsis, the 30-day mortality rate and length of hospital stay. We collect data from patient records at baseline, before the inspections, and at 8 and 14 months after the inspections. We use logistic regression models and linear regression models to compare the various effect measurements between the intervention and control periods. All the models will include time as a covariate to adjust for potential secular changes in the effect measurements during the study period. We collect qualitative data before and after the inspections, and we will conduct a thematic content analysis to explore how inspections affect the involved organisations. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has obtained ethical approval by the Regional Ethics Committee of Norway Nord and the Norwegian Data Protection Authority. It is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02747121). Results will be reported in international peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02747121; Pre-results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5589010 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55890102017-09-14 Effects of external inspection on sepsis detection and treatment: a study protocol for a quasiexperimental study with a stepped-wedge design Hovlid, Einar Frich, Jan C Walshe, Kieran Nilsen, Roy M Flaatten, Hans Kristian Braut, Geir Sverre Helgeland, Jon Teig, Inger Lise Harthug, Stig BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: Inspections are widely used in health care as a means to improve the health services delivered to patients. Despite their widespread use, there is little evidence of their effect. The mechanisms for how inspections can promote change are poorly understood. In this study, we use a national inspection campaign of sepsis detection and initial treatment in hospitals as case to: (1) Explore how inspections affect the involved organizations. (2) Evaluate what effect external inspections have on the process of delivering care to patients, measured by change in indicators reflecting how sepsis detection and treatment is carried out. (3) Evaluate whether external inspections affect patient outcomes, measured as change in the 30-day mortality rate and length of hospital stay. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The intervention that we study is inspections of sepsis detection and treatment in hospitals. The intervention will be rolled out sequentially during 12 months to 24 hospitals. Our effect measures are change on indicators related to the detection and treatment of sepsis, the 30-day mortality rate and length of hospital stay. We collect data from patient records at baseline, before the inspections, and at 8 and 14 months after the inspections. We use logistic regression models and linear regression models to compare the various effect measurements between the intervention and control periods. All the models will include time as a covariate to adjust for potential secular changes in the effect measurements during the study period. We collect qualitative data before and after the inspections, and we will conduct a thematic content analysis to explore how inspections affect the involved organisations. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has obtained ethical approval by the Regional Ethics Committee of Norway Nord and the Norwegian Data Protection Authority. It is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02747121). Results will be reported in international peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02747121; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5589010/ /pubmed/28877944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016213 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Hovlid, Einar Frich, Jan C Walshe, Kieran Nilsen, Roy M Flaatten, Hans Kristian Braut, Geir Sverre Helgeland, Jon Teig, Inger Lise Harthug, Stig Effects of external inspection on sepsis detection and treatment: a study protocol for a quasiexperimental study with a stepped-wedge design |
title | Effects of external inspection on sepsis detection and treatment: a study protocol for a quasiexperimental study with a stepped-wedge design |
title_full | Effects of external inspection on sepsis detection and treatment: a study protocol for a quasiexperimental study with a stepped-wedge design |
title_fullStr | Effects of external inspection on sepsis detection and treatment: a study protocol for a quasiexperimental study with a stepped-wedge design |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of external inspection on sepsis detection and treatment: a study protocol for a quasiexperimental study with a stepped-wedge design |
title_short | Effects of external inspection on sepsis detection and treatment: a study protocol for a quasiexperimental study with a stepped-wedge design |
title_sort | effects of external inspection on sepsis detection and treatment: a study protocol for a quasiexperimental study with a stepped-wedge design |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5589010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28877944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016213 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hovlideinar effectsofexternalinspectiononsepsisdetectionandtreatmentastudyprotocolforaquasiexperimentalstudywithasteppedwedgedesign AT frichjanc effectsofexternalinspectiononsepsisdetectionandtreatmentastudyprotocolforaquasiexperimentalstudywithasteppedwedgedesign AT walshekieran effectsofexternalinspectiononsepsisdetectionandtreatmentastudyprotocolforaquasiexperimentalstudywithasteppedwedgedesign AT nilsenroym effectsofexternalinspectiononsepsisdetectionandtreatmentastudyprotocolforaquasiexperimentalstudywithasteppedwedgedesign AT flaattenhanskristian effectsofexternalinspectiononsepsisdetectionandtreatmentastudyprotocolforaquasiexperimentalstudywithasteppedwedgedesign AT brautgeirsverre effectsofexternalinspectiononsepsisdetectionandtreatmentastudyprotocolforaquasiexperimentalstudywithasteppedwedgedesign AT helgelandjon effectsofexternalinspectiononsepsisdetectionandtreatmentastudyprotocolforaquasiexperimentalstudywithasteppedwedgedesign AT teigingerlise effectsofexternalinspectiononsepsisdetectionandtreatmentastudyprotocolforaquasiexperimentalstudywithasteppedwedgedesign AT harthugstig effectsofexternalinspectiononsepsisdetectionandtreatmentastudyprotocolforaquasiexperimentalstudywithasteppedwedgedesign |