Cargando…

Effects of external inspection on sepsis detection and treatment: a study protocol for a quasiexperimental study with a stepped-wedge design

INTRODUCTION: Inspections are widely used in health care as a means to improve the health services delivered to patients. Despite their widespread use, there is little evidence of their effect. The mechanisms for how inspections can promote change are poorly understood. In this study, we use a natio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hovlid, Einar, Frich, Jan C, Walshe, Kieran, Nilsen, Roy M, Flaatten, Hans Kristian, Braut, Geir Sverre, Helgeland, Jon, Teig, Inger Lise, Harthug, Stig
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5589010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28877944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016213
_version_ 1783262265703661568
author Hovlid, Einar
Frich, Jan C
Walshe, Kieran
Nilsen, Roy M
Flaatten, Hans Kristian
Braut, Geir Sverre
Helgeland, Jon
Teig, Inger Lise
Harthug, Stig
author_facet Hovlid, Einar
Frich, Jan C
Walshe, Kieran
Nilsen, Roy M
Flaatten, Hans Kristian
Braut, Geir Sverre
Helgeland, Jon
Teig, Inger Lise
Harthug, Stig
author_sort Hovlid, Einar
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Inspections are widely used in health care as a means to improve the health services delivered to patients. Despite their widespread use, there is little evidence of their effect. The mechanisms for how inspections can promote change are poorly understood. In this study, we use a national inspection campaign of sepsis detection and initial treatment in hospitals as case to: (1) Explore how inspections affect the involved organizations. (2) Evaluate what effect external inspections have on the process of delivering care to patients, measured by change in indicators reflecting how sepsis detection and treatment is carried out. (3) Evaluate whether external inspections affect patient outcomes, measured as change in the 30-day mortality rate and length of hospital stay. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The intervention that we study is inspections of sepsis detection and treatment in hospitals. The intervention will be rolled out sequentially during 12 months to 24 hospitals. Our effect measures are change on indicators related to the detection and treatment of sepsis, the 30-day mortality rate and length of hospital stay. We collect data from patient records at baseline, before the inspections, and at 8 and 14 months after the inspections. We use logistic regression models and linear regression models to compare the various effect measurements between the intervention and control periods. All the models will include time as a covariate to adjust for potential secular changes in the effect measurements during the study period. We collect qualitative data before and after the inspections, and we will conduct a thematic content analysis to explore how inspections affect the involved organisations. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has obtained ethical approval by the Regional Ethics Committee of Norway Nord and the Norwegian Data Protection Authority. It is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02747121). Results will be reported in international peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02747121; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5589010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55890102017-09-14 Effects of external inspection on sepsis detection and treatment: a study protocol for a quasiexperimental study with a stepped-wedge design Hovlid, Einar Frich, Jan C Walshe, Kieran Nilsen, Roy M Flaatten, Hans Kristian Braut, Geir Sverre Helgeland, Jon Teig, Inger Lise Harthug, Stig BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: Inspections are widely used in health care as a means to improve the health services delivered to patients. Despite their widespread use, there is little evidence of their effect. The mechanisms for how inspections can promote change are poorly understood. In this study, we use a national inspection campaign of sepsis detection and initial treatment in hospitals as case to: (1) Explore how inspections affect the involved organizations. (2) Evaluate what effect external inspections have on the process of delivering care to patients, measured by change in indicators reflecting how sepsis detection and treatment is carried out. (3) Evaluate whether external inspections affect patient outcomes, measured as change in the 30-day mortality rate and length of hospital stay. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The intervention that we study is inspections of sepsis detection and treatment in hospitals. The intervention will be rolled out sequentially during 12 months to 24 hospitals. Our effect measures are change on indicators related to the detection and treatment of sepsis, the 30-day mortality rate and length of hospital stay. We collect data from patient records at baseline, before the inspections, and at 8 and 14 months after the inspections. We use logistic regression models and linear regression models to compare the various effect measurements between the intervention and control periods. All the models will include time as a covariate to adjust for potential secular changes in the effect measurements during the study period. We collect qualitative data before and after the inspections, and we will conduct a thematic content analysis to explore how inspections affect the involved organisations. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has obtained ethical approval by the Regional Ethics Committee of Norway Nord and the Norwegian Data Protection Authority. It is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02747121). Results will be reported in international peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02747121; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5589010/ /pubmed/28877944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016213 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Hovlid, Einar
Frich, Jan C
Walshe, Kieran
Nilsen, Roy M
Flaatten, Hans Kristian
Braut, Geir Sverre
Helgeland, Jon
Teig, Inger Lise
Harthug, Stig
Effects of external inspection on sepsis detection and treatment: a study protocol for a quasiexperimental study with a stepped-wedge design
title Effects of external inspection on sepsis detection and treatment: a study protocol for a quasiexperimental study with a stepped-wedge design
title_full Effects of external inspection on sepsis detection and treatment: a study protocol for a quasiexperimental study with a stepped-wedge design
title_fullStr Effects of external inspection on sepsis detection and treatment: a study protocol for a quasiexperimental study with a stepped-wedge design
title_full_unstemmed Effects of external inspection on sepsis detection and treatment: a study protocol for a quasiexperimental study with a stepped-wedge design
title_short Effects of external inspection on sepsis detection and treatment: a study protocol for a quasiexperimental study with a stepped-wedge design
title_sort effects of external inspection on sepsis detection and treatment: a study protocol for a quasiexperimental study with a stepped-wedge design
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5589010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28877944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016213
work_keys_str_mv AT hovlideinar effectsofexternalinspectiononsepsisdetectionandtreatmentastudyprotocolforaquasiexperimentalstudywithasteppedwedgedesign
AT frichjanc effectsofexternalinspectiononsepsisdetectionandtreatmentastudyprotocolforaquasiexperimentalstudywithasteppedwedgedesign
AT walshekieran effectsofexternalinspectiononsepsisdetectionandtreatmentastudyprotocolforaquasiexperimentalstudywithasteppedwedgedesign
AT nilsenroym effectsofexternalinspectiononsepsisdetectionandtreatmentastudyprotocolforaquasiexperimentalstudywithasteppedwedgedesign
AT flaattenhanskristian effectsofexternalinspectiononsepsisdetectionandtreatmentastudyprotocolforaquasiexperimentalstudywithasteppedwedgedesign
AT brautgeirsverre effectsofexternalinspectiononsepsisdetectionandtreatmentastudyprotocolforaquasiexperimentalstudywithasteppedwedgedesign
AT helgelandjon effectsofexternalinspectiononsepsisdetectionandtreatmentastudyprotocolforaquasiexperimentalstudywithasteppedwedgedesign
AT teigingerlise effectsofexternalinspectiononsepsisdetectionandtreatmentastudyprotocolforaquasiexperimentalstudywithasteppedwedgedesign
AT harthugstig effectsofexternalinspectiononsepsisdetectionandtreatmentastudyprotocolforaquasiexperimentalstudywithasteppedwedgedesign