Cargando…

Labtracker+, a medical smartphone app for the interpretation of consecutive laboratory results: an external validation study

OBJECTIVES: When monitoring patients over time, clinicians may struggle to distinguish ‘real changes’ in consecutive blood parameters from so-called natural fluctuations. In practice, they have to do so by relying on their clinical experience and intuition. We developed Labtracker+, a medical app th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hilderink, Judith M, Rennenberg, Roger J M W, Vanmolkot, Floris H M, Bekers, Otto, Koopmans, Richard P, Meex, Steven J R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5589013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28864694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015854
_version_ 1783262266421936128
author Hilderink, Judith M
Rennenberg, Roger J M W
Vanmolkot, Floris H M
Bekers, Otto
Koopmans, Richard P
Meex, Steven J R
author_facet Hilderink, Judith M
Rennenberg, Roger J M W
Vanmolkot, Floris H M
Bekers, Otto
Koopmans, Richard P
Meex, Steven J R
author_sort Hilderink, Judith M
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: When monitoring patients over time, clinicians may struggle to distinguish ‘real changes’ in consecutive blood parameters from so-called natural fluctuations. In practice, they have to do so by relying on their clinical experience and intuition. We developed Labtracker+, a medical app that calculates the probability that an increase or decrease over time in a specific blood parameter is real, given the time between measurements. DESIGN: We presented patient cases to 135 participants to examine whether there is a difference between medical students, residents and experienced clinicians when it comes to interpreting changes between consecutive laboratory results. Participants were asked to interpret if changes in consecutive laboratory values were likely to be ‘real’ or rather due to natural fluctuations. The answers of the study participants were compared with the calculated probabilities by the app Labtracker+ and the concordance rates were assessed. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Medical students (n=92), medical residents from the department of internal medicine (n=19) and internists (n=24) at a Dutch University Medical Centre. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Concordance rates between the study participants and the calculated probabilities by the app Labtracker+ were compared. Besides, we tested whether physicians with clinical experience scored better concordance rates with the app Labtracker+ than inexperienced clinicians. RESULTS: Medical residents and internists showed significantly better concordance rates with the calculated probabilities by the app Labtracker+ than medical students, regarding their interpretation of differences between consecutive laboratory results (p=0.009 and p<0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: The app Labtracker+ could serve as a clinical decision tool in the interpretation of consecutive laboratory test results and could contribute to rapid recognition of parameter changes by physicians.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5589013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55890132017-09-14 Labtracker+, a medical smartphone app for the interpretation of consecutive laboratory results: an external validation study Hilderink, Judith M Rennenberg, Roger J M W Vanmolkot, Floris H M Bekers, Otto Koopmans, Richard P Meex, Steven J R BMJ Open Medical Education and Training OBJECTIVES: When monitoring patients over time, clinicians may struggle to distinguish ‘real changes’ in consecutive blood parameters from so-called natural fluctuations. In practice, they have to do so by relying on their clinical experience and intuition. We developed Labtracker+, a medical app that calculates the probability that an increase or decrease over time in a specific blood parameter is real, given the time between measurements. DESIGN: We presented patient cases to 135 participants to examine whether there is a difference between medical students, residents and experienced clinicians when it comes to interpreting changes between consecutive laboratory results. Participants were asked to interpret if changes in consecutive laboratory values were likely to be ‘real’ or rather due to natural fluctuations. The answers of the study participants were compared with the calculated probabilities by the app Labtracker+ and the concordance rates were assessed. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Medical students (n=92), medical residents from the department of internal medicine (n=19) and internists (n=24) at a Dutch University Medical Centre. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Concordance rates between the study participants and the calculated probabilities by the app Labtracker+ were compared. Besides, we tested whether physicians with clinical experience scored better concordance rates with the app Labtracker+ than inexperienced clinicians. RESULTS: Medical residents and internists showed significantly better concordance rates with the calculated probabilities by the app Labtracker+ than medical students, regarding their interpretation of differences between consecutive laboratory results (p=0.009 and p<0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: The app Labtracker+ could serve as a clinical decision tool in the interpretation of consecutive laboratory test results and could contribute to rapid recognition of parameter changes by physicians. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5589013/ /pubmed/28864694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015854 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Medical Education and Training
Hilderink, Judith M
Rennenberg, Roger J M W
Vanmolkot, Floris H M
Bekers, Otto
Koopmans, Richard P
Meex, Steven J R
Labtracker+, a medical smartphone app for the interpretation of consecutive laboratory results: an external validation study
title Labtracker+, a medical smartphone app for the interpretation of consecutive laboratory results: an external validation study
title_full Labtracker+, a medical smartphone app for the interpretation of consecutive laboratory results: an external validation study
title_fullStr Labtracker+, a medical smartphone app for the interpretation of consecutive laboratory results: an external validation study
title_full_unstemmed Labtracker+, a medical smartphone app for the interpretation of consecutive laboratory results: an external validation study
title_short Labtracker+, a medical smartphone app for the interpretation of consecutive laboratory results: an external validation study
title_sort labtracker+, a medical smartphone app for the interpretation of consecutive laboratory results: an external validation study
topic Medical Education and Training
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5589013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28864694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015854
work_keys_str_mv AT hilderinkjudithm labtrackeramedicalsmartphoneappfortheinterpretationofconsecutivelaboratoryresultsanexternalvalidationstudy
AT rennenbergrogerjmw labtrackeramedicalsmartphoneappfortheinterpretationofconsecutivelaboratoryresultsanexternalvalidationstudy
AT vanmolkotflorishm labtrackeramedicalsmartphoneappfortheinterpretationofconsecutivelaboratoryresultsanexternalvalidationstudy
AT bekersotto labtrackeramedicalsmartphoneappfortheinterpretationofconsecutivelaboratoryresultsanexternalvalidationstudy
AT koopmansrichardp labtrackeramedicalsmartphoneappfortheinterpretationofconsecutivelaboratoryresultsanexternalvalidationstudy
AT meexstevenjr labtrackeramedicalsmartphoneappfortheinterpretationofconsecutivelaboratoryresultsanexternalvalidationstudy