Cargando…
Labtracker+, a medical smartphone app for the interpretation of consecutive laboratory results: an external validation study
OBJECTIVES: When monitoring patients over time, clinicians may struggle to distinguish ‘real changes’ in consecutive blood parameters from so-called natural fluctuations. In practice, they have to do so by relying on their clinical experience and intuition. We developed Labtracker+, a medical app th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5589013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28864694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015854 |
_version_ | 1783262266421936128 |
---|---|
author | Hilderink, Judith M Rennenberg, Roger J M W Vanmolkot, Floris H M Bekers, Otto Koopmans, Richard P Meex, Steven J R |
author_facet | Hilderink, Judith M Rennenberg, Roger J M W Vanmolkot, Floris H M Bekers, Otto Koopmans, Richard P Meex, Steven J R |
author_sort | Hilderink, Judith M |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: When monitoring patients over time, clinicians may struggle to distinguish ‘real changes’ in consecutive blood parameters from so-called natural fluctuations. In practice, they have to do so by relying on their clinical experience and intuition. We developed Labtracker+, a medical app that calculates the probability that an increase or decrease over time in a specific blood parameter is real, given the time between measurements. DESIGN: We presented patient cases to 135 participants to examine whether there is a difference between medical students, residents and experienced clinicians when it comes to interpreting changes between consecutive laboratory results. Participants were asked to interpret if changes in consecutive laboratory values were likely to be ‘real’ or rather due to natural fluctuations. The answers of the study participants were compared with the calculated probabilities by the app Labtracker+ and the concordance rates were assessed. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Medical students (n=92), medical residents from the department of internal medicine (n=19) and internists (n=24) at a Dutch University Medical Centre. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Concordance rates between the study participants and the calculated probabilities by the app Labtracker+ were compared. Besides, we tested whether physicians with clinical experience scored better concordance rates with the app Labtracker+ than inexperienced clinicians. RESULTS: Medical residents and internists showed significantly better concordance rates with the calculated probabilities by the app Labtracker+ than medical students, regarding their interpretation of differences between consecutive laboratory results (p=0.009 and p<0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: The app Labtracker+ could serve as a clinical decision tool in the interpretation of consecutive laboratory test results and could contribute to rapid recognition of parameter changes by physicians. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5589013 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55890132017-09-14 Labtracker+, a medical smartphone app for the interpretation of consecutive laboratory results: an external validation study Hilderink, Judith M Rennenberg, Roger J M W Vanmolkot, Floris H M Bekers, Otto Koopmans, Richard P Meex, Steven J R BMJ Open Medical Education and Training OBJECTIVES: When monitoring patients over time, clinicians may struggle to distinguish ‘real changes’ in consecutive blood parameters from so-called natural fluctuations. In practice, they have to do so by relying on their clinical experience and intuition. We developed Labtracker+, a medical app that calculates the probability that an increase or decrease over time in a specific blood parameter is real, given the time between measurements. DESIGN: We presented patient cases to 135 participants to examine whether there is a difference between medical students, residents and experienced clinicians when it comes to interpreting changes between consecutive laboratory results. Participants were asked to interpret if changes in consecutive laboratory values were likely to be ‘real’ or rather due to natural fluctuations. The answers of the study participants were compared with the calculated probabilities by the app Labtracker+ and the concordance rates were assessed. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Medical students (n=92), medical residents from the department of internal medicine (n=19) and internists (n=24) at a Dutch University Medical Centre. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Concordance rates between the study participants and the calculated probabilities by the app Labtracker+ were compared. Besides, we tested whether physicians with clinical experience scored better concordance rates with the app Labtracker+ than inexperienced clinicians. RESULTS: Medical residents and internists showed significantly better concordance rates with the calculated probabilities by the app Labtracker+ than medical students, regarding their interpretation of differences between consecutive laboratory results (p=0.009 and p<0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: The app Labtracker+ could serve as a clinical decision tool in the interpretation of consecutive laboratory test results and could contribute to rapid recognition of parameter changes by physicians. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5589013/ /pubmed/28864694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015854 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Medical Education and Training Hilderink, Judith M Rennenberg, Roger J M W Vanmolkot, Floris H M Bekers, Otto Koopmans, Richard P Meex, Steven J R Labtracker+, a medical smartphone app for the interpretation of consecutive laboratory results: an external validation study |
title |
Labtracker+, a medical smartphone app for the interpretation of consecutive laboratory results: an external validation study |
title_full |
Labtracker+, a medical smartphone app for the interpretation of consecutive laboratory results: an external validation study |
title_fullStr |
Labtracker+, a medical smartphone app for the interpretation of consecutive laboratory results: an external validation study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Labtracker+, a medical smartphone app for the interpretation of consecutive laboratory results: an external validation study |
title_short |
Labtracker+, a medical smartphone app for the interpretation of consecutive laboratory results: an external validation study |
title_sort | labtracker+, a medical smartphone app for the interpretation of consecutive laboratory results: an external validation study |
topic | Medical Education and Training |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5589013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28864694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015854 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hilderinkjudithm labtrackeramedicalsmartphoneappfortheinterpretationofconsecutivelaboratoryresultsanexternalvalidationstudy AT rennenbergrogerjmw labtrackeramedicalsmartphoneappfortheinterpretationofconsecutivelaboratoryresultsanexternalvalidationstudy AT vanmolkotflorishm labtrackeramedicalsmartphoneappfortheinterpretationofconsecutivelaboratoryresultsanexternalvalidationstudy AT bekersotto labtrackeramedicalsmartphoneappfortheinterpretationofconsecutivelaboratoryresultsanexternalvalidationstudy AT koopmansrichardp labtrackeramedicalsmartphoneappfortheinterpretationofconsecutivelaboratoryresultsanexternalvalidationstudy AT meexstevenjr labtrackeramedicalsmartphoneappfortheinterpretationofconsecutivelaboratoryresultsanexternalvalidationstudy |