Cargando…
Comparison of clinical utilities of the platelet count and platelet-lymphocyte ratio for predicting survival in patients with cervical cancer: a single institutional study and literature review
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical utilities of the platelet count and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) for predicting survival in patients with cervical cancer. RESULTS: Multivariate analyses demonstrated that thrombocytosis and elevated PLR were found to be independent prognostic factors for progre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5589667/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28903428 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19560 |
_version_ | 1783262379946016768 |
---|---|
author | Kozasa, Katsumi Mabuchi, Seiji Komura, Naoko Yokoi, Eriko Hiromasa, Kuroda Sasano, Tomoyuki Kawano, Mahiru Matsumoto, Yuri Kobayashi, Eiji Kimura, Tadashi |
author_facet | Kozasa, Katsumi Mabuchi, Seiji Komura, Naoko Yokoi, Eriko Hiromasa, Kuroda Sasano, Tomoyuki Kawano, Mahiru Matsumoto, Yuri Kobayashi, Eiji Kimura, Tadashi |
author_sort | Kozasa, Katsumi |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical utilities of the platelet count and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) for predicting survival in patients with cervical cancer. RESULTS: Multivariate analyses demonstrated that thrombocytosis and elevated PLR were found to be independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS, P = 0.0077, P = 0.044) and overall survival (OS, P = 0.025, P = 0.019) in separate Multivariate analyses. In the ROC analysis, the platelet count showed a significantly greater area under the ROC curve (AUC) value than that of PLR for predicting patient recurrence (0.5941 versus 0.5331, p = 0.018) and survival (0.6139 versus 0.5468, p = 0.029). In patients without thrombocytosis, elevated PLR correlated with shorter survival (PFS, P = 0.041; OS, P = 0.017). In contrast, PLR in patients with thrombocytosis did not provide prognostic information. We divided patients into 3 prognostic groups using platelet counts and PLR: high-risk (thrombocytosis with any PLR); intermediate-risk (elevated PLR without thrombocytosis); low-risk (none of the above), which allowed for individualized and accurate survival estimates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes of cervical cancer patients were identified. Patients were grouped according to their pretreatment platelet counts or PLR, and clinicopathological characteristics and patient survival were then compared between these groups. The clinical utilities of the platelet count and PLR were compared using a time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment thrombocytosis and elevated PLR were identified as independent predictors in cervical cancer patients. Platelet counts were superior to PLR for predicting the prognosis of uterine cervical cancer patients. Our prognostic model consisting of platelet counts and PLR offers individualized survival estimates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5589667 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55896672017-09-12 Comparison of clinical utilities of the platelet count and platelet-lymphocyte ratio for predicting survival in patients with cervical cancer: a single institutional study and literature review Kozasa, Katsumi Mabuchi, Seiji Komura, Naoko Yokoi, Eriko Hiromasa, Kuroda Sasano, Tomoyuki Kawano, Mahiru Matsumoto, Yuri Kobayashi, Eiji Kimura, Tadashi Oncotarget Research Paper OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical utilities of the platelet count and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) for predicting survival in patients with cervical cancer. RESULTS: Multivariate analyses demonstrated that thrombocytosis and elevated PLR were found to be independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS, P = 0.0077, P = 0.044) and overall survival (OS, P = 0.025, P = 0.019) in separate Multivariate analyses. In the ROC analysis, the platelet count showed a significantly greater area under the ROC curve (AUC) value than that of PLR for predicting patient recurrence (0.5941 versus 0.5331, p = 0.018) and survival (0.6139 versus 0.5468, p = 0.029). In patients without thrombocytosis, elevated PLR correlated with shorter survival (PFS, P = 0.041; OS, P = 0.017). In contrast, PLR in patients with thrombocytosis did not provide prognostic information. We divided patients into 3 prognostic groups using platelet counts and PLR: high-risk (thrombocytosis with any PLR); intermediate-risk (elevated PLR without thrombocytosis); low-risk (none of the above), which allowed for individualized and accurate survival estimates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes of cervical cancer patients were identified. Patients were grouped according to their pretreatment platelet counts or PLR, and clinicopathological characteristics and patient survival were then compared between these groups. The clinical utilities of the platelet count and PLR were compared using a time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment thrombocytosis and elevated PLR were identified as independent predictors in cervical cancer patients. Platelet counts were superior to PLR for predicting the prognosis of uterine cervical cancer patients. Our prognostic model consisting of platelet counts and PLR offers individualized survival estimates. Impact Journals LLC 2017-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5589667/ /pubmed/28903428 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19560 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Kozasa et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Kozasa, Katsumi Mabuchi, Seiji Komura, Naoko Yokoi, Eriko Hiromasa, Kuroda Sasano, Tomoyuki Kawano, Mahiru Matsumoto, Yuri Kobayashi, Eiji Kimura, Tadashi Comparison of clinical utilities of the platelet count and platelet-lymphocyte ratio for predicting survival in patients with cervical cancer: a single institutional study and literature review |
title | Comparison of clinical utilities of the platelet count and platelet-lymphocyte ratio for predicting survival in patients with cervical cancer: a single institutional study and literature review |
title_full | Comparison of clinical utilities of the platelet count and platelet-lymphocyte ratio for predicting survival in patients with cervical cancer: a single institutional study and literature review |
title_fullStr | Comparison of clinical utilities of the platelet count and platelet-lymphocyte ratio for predicting survival in patients with cervical cancer: a single institutional study and literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of clinical utilities of the platelet count and platelet-lymphocyte ratio for predicting survival in patients with cervical cancer: a single institutional study and literature review |
title_short | Comparison of clinical utilities of the platelet count and platelet-lymphocyte ratio for predicting survival in patients with cervical cancer: a single institutional study and literature review |
title_sort | comparison of clinical utilities of the platelet count and platelet-lymphocyte ratio for predicting survival in patients with cervical cancer: a single institutional study and literature review |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5589667/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28903428 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19560 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kozasakatsumi comparisonofclinicalutilitiesoftheplateletcountandplateletlymphocyteratioforpredictingsurvivalinpatientswithcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionalstudyandliteraturereview AT mabuchiseiji comparisonofclinicalutilitiesoftheplateletcountandplateletlymphocyteratioforpredictingsurvivalinpatientswithcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionalstudyandliteraturereview AT komuranaoko comparisonofclinicalutilitiesoftheplateletcountandplateletlymphocyteratioforpredictingsurvivalinpatientswithcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionalstudyandliteraturereview AT yokoieriko comparisonofclinicalutilitiesoftheplateletcountandplateletlymphocyteratioforpredictingsurvivalinpatientswithcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionalstudyandliteraturereview AT hiromasakuroda comparisonofclinicalutilitiesoftheplateletcountandplateletlymphocyteratioforpredictingsurvivalinpatientswithcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionalstudyandliteraturereview AT sasanotomoyuki comparisonofclinicalutilitiesoftheplateletcountandplateletlymphocyteratioforpredictingsurvivalinpatientswithcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionalstudyandliteraturereview AT kawanomahiru comparisonofclinicalutilitiesoftheplateletcountandplateletlymphocyteratioforpredictingsurvivalinpatientswithcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionalstudyandliteraturereview AT matsumotoyuri comparisonofclinicalutilitiesoftheplateletcountandplateletlymphocyteratioforpredictingsurvivalinpatientswithcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionalstudyandliteraturereview AT kobayashieiji comparisonofclinicalutilitiesoftheplateletcountandplateletlymphocyteratioforpredictingsurvivalinpatientswithcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionalstudyandliteraturereview AT kimuratadashi comparisonofclinicalutilitiesoftheplateletcountandplateletlymphocyteratioforpredictingsurvivalinpatientswithcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionalstudyandliteraturereview |