Cargando…

Comparison of clinical utilities of the platelet count and platelet-lymphocyte ratio for predicting survival in patients with cervical cancer: a single institutional study and literature review

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical utilities of the platelet count and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) for predicting survival in patients with cervical cancer. RESULTS: Multivariate analyses demonstrated that thrombocytosis and elevated PLR were found to be independent prognostic factors for progre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kozasa, Katsumi, Mabuchi, Seiji, Komura, Naoko, Yokoi, Eriko, Hiromasa, Kuroda, Sasano, Tomoyuki, Kawano, Mahiru, Matsumoto, Yuri, Kobayashi, Eiji, Kimura, Tadashi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5589667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28903428
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19560
_version_ 1783262379946016768
author Kozasa, Katsumi
Mabuchi, Seiji
Komura, Naoko
Yokoi, Eriko
Hiromasa, Kuroda
Sasano, Tomoyuki
Kawano, Mahiru
Matsumoto, Yuri
Kobayashi, Eiji
Kimura, Tadashi
author_facet Kozasa, Katsumi
Mabuchi, Seiji
Komura, Naoko
Yokoi, Eriko
Hiromasa, Kuroda
Sasano, Tomoyuki
Kawano, Mahiru
Matsumoto, Yuri
Kobayashi, Eiji
Kimura, Tadashi
author_sort Kozasa, Katsumi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical utilities of the platelet count and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) for predicting survival in patients with cervical cancer. RESULTS: Multivariate analyses demonstrated that thrombocytosis and elevated PLR were found to be independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS, P = 0.0077, P = 0.044) and overall survival (OS, P = 0.025, P = 0.019) in separate Multivariate analyses. In the ROC analysis, the platelet count showed a significantly greater area under the ROC curve (AUC) value than that of PLR for predicting patient recurrence (0.5941 versus 0.5331, p = 0.018) and survival (0.6139 versus 0.5468, p = 0.029). In patients without thrombocytosis, elevated PLR correlated with shorter survival (PFS, P = 0.041; OS, P = 0.017). In contrast, PLR in patients with thrombocytosis did not provide prognostic information. We divided patients into 3 prognostic groups using platelet counts and PLR: high-risk (thrombocytosis with any PLR); intermediate-risk (elevated PLR without thrombocytosis); low-risk (none of the above), which allowed for individualized and accurate survival estimates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes of cervical cancer patients were identified. Patients were grouped according to their pretreatment platelet counts or PLR, and clinicopathological characteristics and patient survival were then compared between these groups. The clinical utilities of the platelet count and PLR were compared using a time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment thrombocytosis and elevated PLR were identified as independent predictors in cervical cancer patients. Platelet counts were superior to PLR for predicting the prognosis of uterine cervical cancer patients. Our prognostic model consisting of platelet counts and PLR offers individualized survival estimates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5589667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55896672017-09-12 Comparison of clinical utilities of the platelet count and platelet-lymphocyte ratio for predicting survival in patients with cervical cancer: a single institutional study and literature review Kozasa, Katsumi Mabuchi, Seiji Komura, Naoko Yokoi, Eriko Hiromasa, Kuroda Sasano, Tomoyuki Kawano, Mahiru Matsumoto, Yuri Kobayashi, Eiji Kimura, Tadashi Oncotarget Research Paper OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical utilities of the platelet count and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) for predicting survival in patients with cervical cancer. RESULTS: Multivariate analyses demonstrated that thrombocytosis and elevated PLR were found to be independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS, P = 0.0077, P = 0.044) and overall survival (OS, P = 0.025, P = 0.019) in separate Multivariate analyses. In the ROC analysis, the platelet count showed a significantly greater area under the ROC curve (AUC) value than that of PLR for predicting patient recurrence (0.5941 versus 0.5331, p = 0.018) and survival (0.6139 versus 0.5468, p = 0.029). In patients without thrombocytosis, elevated PLR correlated with shorter survival (PFS, P = 0.041; OS, P = 0.017). In contrast, PLR in patients with thrombocytosis did not provide prognostic information. We divided patients into 3 prognostic groups using platelet counts and PLR: high-risk (thrombocytosis with any PLR); intermediate-risk (elevated PLR without thrombocytosis); low-risk (none of the above), which allowed for individualized and accurate survival estimates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes of cervical cancer patients were identified. Patients were grouped according to their pretreatment platelet counts or PLR, and clinicopathological characteristics and patient survival were then compared between these groups. The clinical utilities of the platelet count and PLR were compared using a time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment thrombocytosis and elevated PLR were identified as independent predictors in cervical cancer patients. Platelet counts were superior to PLR for predicting the prognosis of uterine cervical cancer patients. Our prognostic model consisting of platelet counts and PLR offers individualized survival estimates. Impact Journals LLC 2017-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5589667/ /pubmed/28903428 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19560 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Kozasa et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Kozasa, Katsumi
Mabuchi, Seiji
Komura, Naoko
Yokoi, Eriko
Hiromasa, Kuroda
Sasano, Tomoyuki
Kawano, Mahiru
Matsumoto, Yuri
Kobayashi, Eiji
Kimura, Tadashi
Comparison of clinical utilities of the platelet count and platelet-lymphocyte ratio for predicting survival in patients with cervical cancer: a single institutional study and literature review
title Comparison of clinical utilities of the platelet count and platelet-lymphocyte ratio for predicting survival in patients with cervical cancer: a single institutional study and literature review
title_full Comparison of clinical utilities of the platelet count and platelet-lymphocyte ratio for predicting survival in patients with cervical cancer: a single institutional study and literature review
title_fullStr Comparison of clinical utilities of the platelet count and platelet-lymphocyte ratio for predicting survival in patients with cervical cancer: a single institutional study and literature review
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of clinical utilities of the platelet count and platelet-lymphocyte ratio for predicting survival in patients with cervical cancer: a single institutional study and literature review
title_short Comparison of clinical utilities of the platelet count and platelet-lymphocyte ratio for predicting survival in patients with cervical cancer: a single institutional study and literature review
title_sort comparison of clinical utilities of the platelet count and platelet-lymphocyte ratio for predicting survival in patients with cervical cancer: a single institutional study and literature review
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5589667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28903428
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19560
work_keys_str_mv AT kozasakatsumi comparisonofclinicalutilitiesoftheplateletcountandplateletlymphocyteratioforpredictingsurvivalinpatientswithcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionalstudyandliteraturereview
AT mabuchiseiji comparisonofclinicalutilitiesoftheplateletcountandplateletlymphocyteratioforpredictingsurvivalinpatientswithcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionalstudyandliteraturereview
AT komuranaoko comparisonofclinicalutilitiesoftheplateletcountandplateletlymphocyteratioforpredictingsurvivalinpatientswithcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionalstudyandliteraturereview
AT yokoieriko comparisonofclinicalutilitiesoftheplateletcountandplateletlymphocyteratioforpredictingsurvivalinpatientswithcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionalstudyandliteraturereview
AT hiromasakuroda comparisonofclinicalutilitiesoftheplateletcountandplateletlymphocyteratioforpredictingsurvivalinpatientswithcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionalstudyandliteraturereview
AT sasanotomoyuki comparisonofclinicalutilitiesoftheplateletcountandplateletlymphocyteratioforpredictingsurvivalinpatientswithcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionalstudyandliteraturereview
AT kawanomahiru comparisonofclinicalutilitiesoftheplateletcountandplateletlymphocyteratioforpredictingsurvivalinpatientswithcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionalstudyandliteraturereview
AT matsumotoyuri comparisonofclinicalutilitiesoftheplateletcountandplateletlymphocyteratioforpredictingsurvivalinpatientswithcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionalstudyandliteraturereview
AT kobayashieiji comparisonofclinicalutilitiesoftheplateletcountandplateletlymphocyteratioforpredictingsurvivalinpatientswithcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionalstudyandliteraturereview
AT kimuratadashi comparisonofclinicalutilitiesoftheplateletcountandplateletlymphocyteratioforpredictingsurvivalinpatientswithcervicalcancerasingleinstitutionalstudyandliteraturereview