Cargando…
Software for improved field surveys of nesting marine turtles
Field data are still recorded on paper in many worldwide beach surveys of nesting marine turtles. The data must be subsequently transferred into an electronic database, and this can introduce errors in the dataset. To minimize such errors, the “Turtles” software was developed and piloted to record f...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5589930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28883447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11245-6 |
_version_ | 1783262438126256128 |
---|---|
author | Anastácio, R. Gonzalez, J. M. Slater, K. Pereira, M. J. |
author_facet | Anastácio, R. Gonzalez, J. M. Slater, K. Pereira, M. J. |
author_sort | Anastácio, R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Field data are still recorded on paper in many worldwide beach surveys of nesting marine turtles. The data must be subsequently transferred into an electronic database, and this can introduce errors in the dataset. To minimize such errors, the “Turtles” software was developed and piloted to record field data by one software user accompanying one Tortuguero in Akumal beaches, Quintana Roo, Mexico, from June 1(st) to July 31(st) during the night patrols. Comparisons were made between exported data from the software with the paper forms entered into a database (henceforth traditional). Preliminary assessment indicated that the software user tended to record a greater amount of metrics (i.e., an average of 18.3 fields ± 5.4 sd vs. 8.6 fields ± 2.1 sd recorded by the traditional method). The traditional method introduce three types of “errors” into a dataset: missing values in relevant fields (40.1%), different answers for the same value (9.8%), and inconsistent data (0.9%). Only 5.8% of these (missing values) were found with the software methodology. Although only tested by a single user, the software may suggest increased efficacy and warrants further examination to accurately assess the merit of replacing traditional methods of data recording for beach monitoring programmes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5589930 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55899302017-09-13 Software for improved field surveys of nesting marine turtles Anastácio, R. Gonzalez, J. M. Slater, K. Pereira, M. J. Sci Rep Article Field data are still recorded on paper in many worldwide beach surveys of nesting marine turtles. The data must be subsequently transferred into an electronic database, and this can introduce errors in the dataset. To minimize such errors, the “Turtles” software was developed and piloted to record field data by one software user accompanying one Tortuguero in Akumal beaches, Quintana Roo, Mexico, from June 1(st) to July 31(st) during the night patrols. Comparisons were made between exported data from the software with the paper forms entered into a database (henceforth traditional). Preliminary assessment indicated that the software user tended to record a greater amount of metrics (i.e., an average of 18.3 fields ± 5.4 sd vs. 8.6 fields ± 2.1 sd recorded by the traditional method). The traditional method introduce three types of “errors” into a dataset: missing values in relevant fields (40.1%), different answers for the same value (9.8%), and inconsistent data (0.9%). Only 5.8% of these (missing values) were found with the software methodology. Although only tested by a single user, the software may suggest increased efficacy and warrants further examination to accurately assess the merit of replacing traditional methods of data recording for beach monitoring programmes. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5589930/ /pubmed/28883447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11245-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Anastácio, R. Gonzalez, J. M. Slater, K. Pereira, M. J. Software for improved field surveys of nesting marine turtles |
title | Software for improved field surveys of nesting marine turtles |
title_full | Software for improved field surveys of nesting marine turtles |
title_fullStr | Software for improved field surveys of nesting marine turtles |
title_full_unstemmed | Software for improved field surveys of nesting marine turtles |
title_short | Software for improved field surveys of nesting marine turtles |
title_sort | software for improved field surveys of nesting marine turtles |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5589930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28883447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11245-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anastacior softwareforimprovedfieldsurveysofnestingmarineturtles AT gonzalezjm softwareforimprovedfieldsurveysofnestingmarineturtles AT slaterk softwareforimprovedfieldsurveysofnestingmarineturtles AT pereiramj softwareforimprovedfieldsurveysofnestingmarineturtles |