Cargando…

Software for improved field surveys of nesting marine turtles

Field data are still recorded on paper in many worldwide beach surveys of nesting marine turtles. The data must be subsequently transferred into an electronic database, and this can introduce errors in the dataset. To minimize such errors, the “Turtles” software was developed and piloted to record f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anastácio, R., Gonzalez, J. M., Slater, K., Pereira, M. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5589930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28883447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11245-6
_version_ 1783262438126256128
author Anastácio, R.
Gonzalez, J. M.
Slater, K.
Pereira, M. J.
author_facet Anastácio, R.
Gonzalez, J. M.
Slater, K.
Pereira, M. J.
author_sort Anastácio, R.
collection PubMed
description Field data are still recorded on paper in many worldwide beach surveys of nesting marine turtles. The data must be subsequently transferred into an electronic database, and this can introduce errors in the dataset. To minimize such errors, the “Turtles” software was developed and piloted to record field data by one software user accompanying one Tortuguero in Akumal beaches, Quintana Roo, Mexico, from June 1(st) to July 31(st) during the night patrols. Comparisons were made between exported data from the software with the paper forms entered into a database (henceforth traditional). Preliminary assessment indicated that the software user tended to record a greater amount of metrics (i.e., an average of 18.3 fields ± 5.4 sd vs. 8.6 fields ± 2.1 sd recorded by the traditional method). The traditional method introduce three types of “errors” into a dataset: missing values in relevant fields (40.1%), different answers for the same value (9.8%), and inconsistent data (0.9%). Only 5.8% of these (missing values) were found with the software methodology. Although only tested by a single user, the software may suggest increased efficacy and warrants further examination to accurately assess the merit of replacing traditional methods of data recording for beach monitoring programmes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5589930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55899302017-09-13 Software for improved field surveys of nesting marine turtles Anastácio, R. Gonzalez, J. M. Slater, K. Pereira, M. J. Sci Rep Article Field data are still recorded on paper in many worldwide beach surveys of nesting marine turtles. The data must be subsequently transferred into an electronic database, and this can introduce errors in the dataset. To minimize such errors, the “Turtles” software was developed and piloted to record field data by one software user accompanying one Tortuguero in Akumal beaches, Quintana Roo, Mexico, from June 1(st) to July 31(st) during the night patrols. Comparisons were made between exported data from the software with the paper forms entered into a database (henceforth traditional). Preliminary assessment indicated that the software user tended to record a greater amount of metrics (i.e., an average of 18.3 fields ± 5.4 sd vs. 8.6 fields ± 2.1 sd recorded by the traditional method). The traditional method introduce three types of “errors” into a dataset: missing values in relevant fields (40.1%), different answers for the same value (9.8%), and inconsistent data (0.9%). Only 5.8% of these (missing values) were found with the software methodology. Although only tested by a single user, the software may suggest increased efficacy and warrants further examination to accurately assess the merit of replacing traditional methods of data recording for beach monitoring programmes. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5589930/ /pubmed/28883447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11245-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Anastácio, R.
Gonzalez, J. M.
Slater, K.
Pereira, M. J.
Software for improved field surveys of nesting marine turtles
title Software for improved field surveys of nesting marine turtles
title_full Software for improved field surveys of nesting marine turtles
title_fullStr Software for improved field surveys of nesting marine turtles
title_full_unstemmed Software for improved field surveys of nesting marine turtles
title_short Software for improved field surveys of nesting marine turtles
title_sort software for improved field surveys of nesting marine turtles
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5589930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28883447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11245-6
work_keys_str_mv AT anastacior softwareforimprovedfieldsurveysofnestingmarineturtles
AT gonzalezjm softwareforimprovedfieldsurveysofnestingmarineturtles
AT slaterk softwareforimprovedfieldsurveysofnestingmarineturtles
AT pereiramj softwareforimprovedfieldsurveysofnestingmarineturtles