Cargando…

Strategies to improve the quality of life of persons post-stroke: protocol of a systematic review

BACKGROUND: While many outcomes post-stroke (e.g., depression) have been previously investigated, there is no complete data on the impact of a variety of quality improvement strategies on the quality of life and physical and psychological well-being of individuals post-stroke. The current paper outl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Munce, Sarah E.P., Perrier, Laure, Shin, Saeha, Adhihetty, Chamila, Pitzul, Kristen, Nelson, Michelle L.A., Bayley, Mark T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5590115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28882175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0579-3
_version_ 1783262470526205952
author Munce, Sarah E.P.
Perrier, Laure
Shin, Saeha
Adhihetty, Chamila
Pitzul, Kristen
Nelson, Michelle L.A.
Bayley, Mark T.
author_facet Munce, Sarah E.P.
Perrier, Laure
Shin, Saeha
Adhihetty, Chamila
Pitzul, Kristen
Nelson, Michelle L.A.
Bayley, Mark T.
author_sort Munce, Sarah E.P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While many outcomes post-stroke (e.g., depression) have been previously investigated, there is no complete data on the impact of a variety of quality improvement strategies on the quality of life and physical and psychological well-being of individuals post-stroke. The current paper outlines a systematic review protocol on the impact of quality improvement strategies on quality of life as well as physical and psychological well-being of individuals with stroke. METHODS: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases will be searched. Two independent reviewers will conduct all levels of screening, data abstraction, and quality appraisal. Only randomized controlled trials that report on the impact of quality improvement strategies on quality of life outcomes in people with stroke will be included. The secondary outcomes will be physical and psychological well-being. Quality improvement strategies include audit and feedback, case management, team changes, electronic patient registries, clinician education, clinical reminders, facilitated relay of clinical information to clinicians, patient education, (promotion of) self-management, patient reminder systems, and continuous quality improvement. Studies published since 2000 will be included to increase the relevancy of findings. Results will be grouped according to the target group of the varying quality improvement strategies (i.e., health system, health care professionals, or patients) and/or by any other noteworthy grouping variables, such as etiology of stroke or by sex. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will identify those quality improvement strategies aimed at the health system, health care professionals, and patients that impact the quality of life of individuals with stroke. Improving awareness and utilization of such strategies may enhance uptake of stroke best practices and reduce inappropriate health care utilization costs. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42017064141 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13643-017-0579-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5590115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55901152017-09-14 Strategies to improve the quality of life of persons post-stroke: protocol of a systematic review Munce, Sarah E.P. Perrier, Laure Shin, Saeha Adhihetty, Chamila Pitzul, Kristen Nelson, Michelle L.A. Bayley, Mark T. Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: While many outcomes post-stroke (e.g., depression) have been previously investigated, there is no complete data on the impact of a variety of quality improvement strategies on the quality of life and physical and psychological well-being of individuals post-stroke. The current paper outlines a systematic review protocol on the impact of quality improvement strategies on quality of life as well as physical and psychological well-being of individuals with stroke. METHODS: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases will be searched. Two independent reviewers will conduct all levels of screening, data abstraction, and quality appraisal. Only randomized controlled trials that report on the impact of quality improvement strategies on quality of life outcomes in people with stroke will be included. The secondary outcomes will be physical and psychological well-being. Quality improvement strategies include audit and feedback, case management, team changes, electronic patient registries, clinician education, clinical reminders, facilitated relay of clinical information to clinicians, patient education, (promotion of) self-management, patient reminder systems, and continuous quality improvement. Studies published since 2000 will be included to increase the relevancy of findings. Results will be grouped according to the target group of the varying quality improvement strategies (i.e., health system, health care professionals, or patients) and/or by any other noteworthy grouping variables, such as etiology of stroke or by sex. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will identify those quality improvement strategies aimed at the health system, health care professionals, and patients that impact the quality of life of individuals with stroke. Improving awareness and utilization of such strategies may enhance uptake of stroke best practices and reduce inappropriate health care utilization costs. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42017064141 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13643-017-0579-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5590115/ /pubmed/28882175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0579-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Munce, Sarah E.P.
Perrier, Laure
Shin, Saeha
Adhihetty, Chamila
Pitzul, Kristen
Nelson, Michelle L.A.
Bayley, Mark T.
Strategies to improve the quality of life of persons post-stroke: protocol of a systematic review
title Strategies to improve the quality of life of persons post-stroke: protocol of a systematic review
title_full Strategies to improve the quality of life of persons post-stroke: protocol of a systematic review
title_fullStr Strategies to improve the quality of life of persons post-stroke: protocol of a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Strategies to improve the quality of life of persons post-stroke: protocol of a systematic review
title_short Strategies to improve the quality of life of persons post-stroke: protocol of a systematic review
title_sort strategies to improve the quality of life of persons post-stroke: protocol of a systematic review
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5590115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28882175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0579-3
work_keys_str_mv AT muncesarahep strategiestoimprovethequalityoflifeofpersonspoststrokeprotocolofasystematicreview
AT perrierlaure strategiestoimprovethequalityoflifeofpersonspoststrokeprotocolofasystematicreview
AT shinsaeha strategiestoimprovethequalityoflifeofpersonspoststrokeprotocolofasystematicreview
AT adhihettychamila strategiestoimprovethequalityoflifeofpersonspoststrokeprotocolofasystematicreview
AT pitzulkristen strategiestoimprovethequalityoflifeofpersonspoststrokeprotocolofasystematicreview
AT nelsonmichellela strategiestoimprovethequalityoflifeofpersonspoststrokeprotocolofasystematicreview
AT bayleymarkt strategiestoimprovethequalityoflifeofpersonspoststrokeprotocolofasystematicreview