Cargando…
Implementation and results of an integrated data quality assurance protocol in a randomized controlled trial in Uttar Pradesh, India
BACKGROUND: There are few published standards or methodological guidelines for integrating Data Quality Assurance (DQA) protocols into large-scale health systems research trials, especially in resource-limited settings. The BetterBirth Trial is a matched-pair, cluster-randomized controlled trial (RC...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5590237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28882167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2159-1 |
_version_ | 1783262495394234368 |
---|---|
author | Gass, Jonathon D. Misra, Anamika Yadav, Mahendra Nath Singh Sana, Fatima Singh, Chetna Mankar, Anup Neal, Brandon J. Fisher-Bowman, Jennifer Maisonneuve, Jenny Delaney, Megan Marx Kumar, Krishan Singh, Vinay Pratap Sharma, Narender Gawande, Atul Semrau, Katherine Hirschhorn, Lisa R. |
author_facet | Gass, Jonathon D. Misra, Anamika Yadav, Mahendra Nath Singh Sana, Fatima Singh, Chetna Mankar, Anup Neal, Brandon J. Fisher-Bowman, Jennifer Maisonneuve, Jenny Delaney, Megan Marx Kumar, Krishan Singh, Vinay Pratap Sharma, Narender Gawande, Atul Semrau, Katherine Hirschhorn, Lisa R. |
author_sort | Gass, Jonathon D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There are few published standards or methodological guidelines for integrating Data Quality Assurance (DQA) protocols into large-scale health systems research trials, especially in resource-limited settings. The BetterBirth Trial is a matched-pair, cluster-randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the BetterBirth Program, which seeks to improve quality of facility-based deliveries and reduce 7-day maternal and neonatal mortality and maternal morbidity in Uttar Pradesh, India. In the trial, over 6300 deliveries were observed and over 153,000 mother-baby pairs across 120 study sites were followed to assess health outcomes. We designed and implemented a robust and integrated DQA system to sustain high-quality data throughout the trial. METHODS: We designed the Data Quality Monitoring and Improvement System (DQMIS) to reinforce six dimensions of data quality: accuracy, reliability, timeliness, completeness, precision, and integrity. The DQMIS was comprised of five functional components: 1) a monitoring and evaluation team to support the system; 2) a DQA protocol, including data collection audits and targets, rapid data feedback, and supportive supervision; 3) training; 4) standard operating procedures for data collection; and 5) an electronic data collection and reporting system. Routine audits by supervisors included double data entry, simultaneous delivery observations, and review of recorded calls to patients. Data feedback reports identified errors automatically, facilitating supportive supervision through a continuous quality improvement model. RESULTS: The five functional components of the DQMIS successfully reinforced data reliability, timeliness, completeness, precision, and integrity. The DQMIS also resulted in 98.33% accuracy across all data collection activities in the trial. All data collection activities demonstrated improvement in accuracy throughout implementation. Data collectors demonstrated a statistically significant (p = 0.0004) increase in accuracy throughout consecutive audits. The DQMIS was successful, despite an increase from 20 to 130 data collectors. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of widely disseminated data quality methods and standards for large RCT interventions in limited-resource settings, we developed an integrated DQA system, combining auditing, rapid data feedback, and supportive supervision, which ensured high-quality data and could serve as a model for future health systems research trials. Future efforts should focus on standardization of DQA processes for health systems research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02148952. Registered on 13 February 2014. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5590237 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55902372017-09-13 Implementation and results of an integrated data quality assurance protocol in a randomized controlled trial in Uttar Pradesh, India Gass, Jonathon D. Misra, Anamika Yadav, Mahendra Nath Singh Sana, Fatima Singh, Chetna Mankar, Anup Neal, Brandon J. Fisher-Bowman, Jennifer Maisonneuve, Jenny Delaney, Megan Marx Kumar, Krishan Singh, Vinay Pratap Sharma, Narender Gawande, Atul Semrau, Katherine Hirschhorn, Lisa R. Trials Methodology BACKGROUND: There are few published standards or methodological guidelines for integrating Data Quality Assurance (DQA) protocols into large-scale health systems research trials, especially in resource-limited settings. The BetterBirth Trial is a matched-pair, cluster-randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the BetterBirth Program, which seeks to improve quality of facility-based deliveries and reduce 7-day maternal and neonatal mortality and maternal morbidity in Uttar Pradesh, India. In the trial, over 6300 deliveries were observed and over 153,000 mother-baby pairs across 120 study sites were followed to assess health outcomes. We designed and implemented a robust and integrated DQA system to sustain high-quality data throughout the trial. METHODS: We designed the Data Quality Monitoring and Improvement System (DQMIS) to reinforce six dimensions of data quality: accuracy, reliability, timeliness, completeness, precision, and integrity. The DQMIS was comprised of five functional components: 1) a monitoring and evaluation team to support the system; 2) a DQA protocol, including data collection audits and targets, rapid data feedback, and supportive supervision; 3) training; 4) standard operating procedures for data collection; and 5) an electronic data collection and reporting system. Routine audits by supervisors included double data entry, simultaneous delivery observations, and review of recorded calls to patients. Data feedback reports identified errors automatically, facilitating supportive supervision through a continuous quality improvement model. RESULTS: The five functional components of the DQMIS successfully reinforced data reliability, timeliness, completeness, precision, and integrity. The DQMIS also resulted in 98.33% accuracy across all data collection activities in the trial. All data collection activities demonstrated improvement in accuracy throughout implementation. Data collectors demonstrated a statistically significant (p = 0.0004) increase in accuracy throughout consecutive audits. The DQMIS was successful, despite an increase from 20 to 130 data collectors. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of widely disseminated data quality methods and standards for large RCT interventions in limited-resource settings, we developed an integrated DQA system, combining auditing, rapid data feedback, and supportive supervision, which ensured high-quality data and could serve as a model for future health systems research trials. Future efforts should focus on standardization of DQA processes for health systems research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02148952. Registered on 13 February 2014. BioMed Central 2017-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5590237/ /pubmed/28882167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2159-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Gass, Jonathon D. Misra, Anamika Yadav, Mahendra Nath Singh Sana, Fatima Singh, Chetna Mankar, Anup Neal, Brandon J. Fisher-Bowman, Jennifer Maisonneuve, Jenny Delaney, Megan Marx Kumar, Krishan Singh, Vinay Pratap Sharma, Narender Gawande, Atul Semrau, Katherine Hirschhorn, Lisa R. Implementation and results of an integrated data quality assurance protocol in a randomized controlled trial in Uttar Pradesh, India |
title | Implementation and results of an integrated data quality assurance protocol in a randomized controlled trial in Uttar Pradesh, India |
title_full | Implementation and results of an integrated data quality assurance protocol in a randomized controlled trial in Uttar Pradesh, India |
title_fullStr | Implementation and results of an integrated data quality assurance protocol in a randomized controlled trial in Uttar Pradesh, India |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation and results of an integrated data quality assurance protocol in a randomized controlled trial in Uttar Pradesh, India |
title_short | Implementation and results of an integrated data quality assurance protocol in a randomized controlled trial in Uttar Pradesh, India |
title_sort | implementation and results of an integrated data quality assurance protocol in a randomized controlled trial in uttar pradesh, india |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5590237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28882167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2159-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gassjonathond implementationandresultsofanintegrateddataqualityassuranceprotocolinarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuttarpradeshindia AT misraanamika implementationandresultsofanintegrateddataqualityassuranceprotocolinarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuttarpradeshindia AT yadavmahendranathsingh implementationandresultsofanintegrateddataqualityassuranceprotocolinarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuttarpradeshindia AT sanafatima implementationandresultsofanintegrateddataqualityassuranceprotocolinarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuttarpradeshindia AT singhchetna implementationandresultsofanintegrateddataqualityassuranceprotocolinarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuttarpradeshindia AT mankaranup implementationandresultsofanintegrateddataqualityassuranceprotocolinarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuttarpradeshindia AT nealbrandonj implementationandresultsofanintegrateddataqualityassuranceprotocolinarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuttarpradeshindia AT fisherbowmanjennifer implementationandresultsofanintegrateddataqualityassuranceprotocolinarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuttarpradeshindia AT maisonneuvejenny implementationandresultsofanintegrateddataqualityassuranceprotocolinarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuttarpradeshindia AT delaneymeganmarx implementationandresultsofanintegrateddataqualityassuranceprotocolinarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuttarpradeshindia AT kumarkrishan implementationandresultsofanintegrateddataqualityassuranceprotocolinarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuttarpradeshindia AT singhvinaypratap implementationandresultsofanintegrateddataqualityassuranceprotocolinarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuttarpradeshindia AT sharmanarender implementationandresultsofanintegrateddataqualityassuranceprotocolinarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuttarpradeshindia AT gawandeatul implementationandresultsofanintegrateddataqualityassuranceprotocolinarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuttarpradeshindia AT semraukatherine implementationandresultsofanintegrateddataqualityassuranceprotocolinarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuttarpradeshindia AT hirschhornlisar implementationandresultsofanintegrateddataqualityassuranceprotocolinarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuttarpradeshindia |