Cargando…

Implementation and results of an integrated data quality assurance protocol in a randomized controlled trial in Uttar Pradesh, India

BACKGROUND: There are few published standards or methodological guidelines for integrating Data Quality Assurance (DQA) protocols into large-scale health systems research trials, especially in resource-limited settings. The BetterBirth Trial is a matched-pair, cluster-randomized controlled trial (RC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gass, Jonathon D., Misra, Anamika, Yadav, Mahendra Nath Singh, Sana, Fatima, Singh, Chetna, Mankar, Anup, Neal, Brandon J., Fisher-Bowman, Jennifer, Maisonneuve, Jenny, Delaney, Megan Marx, Kumar, Krishan, Singh, Vinay Pratap, Sharma, Narender, Gawande, Atul, Semrau, Katherine, Hirschhorn, Lisa R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5590237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28882167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2159-1
_version_ 1783262495394234368
author Gass, Jonathon D.
Misra, Anamika
Yadav, Mahendra Nath Singh
Sana, Fatima
Singh, Chetna
Mankar, Anup
Neal, Brandon J.
Fisher-Bowman, Jennifer
Maisonneuve, Jenny
Delaney, Megan Marx
Kumar, Krishan
Singh, Vinay Pratap
Sharma, Narender
Gawande, Atul
Semrau, Katherine
Hirschhorn, Lisa R.
author_facet Gass, Jonathon D.
Misra, Anamika
Yadav, Mahendra Nath Singh
Sana, Fatima
Singh, Chetna
Mankar, Anup
Neal, Brandon J.
Fisher-Bowman, Jennifer
Maisonneuve, Jenny
Delaney, Megan Marx
Kumar, Krishan
Singh, Vinay Pratap
Sharma, Narender
Gawande, Atul
Semrau, Katherine
Hirschhorn, Lisa R.
author_sort Gass, Jonathon D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are few published standards or methodological guidelines for integrating Data Quality Assurance (DQA) protocols into large-scale health systems research trials, especially in resource-limited settings. The BetterBirth Trial is a matched-pair, cluster-randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the BetterBirth Program, which seeks to improve quality of facility-based deliveries and reduce 7-day maternal and neonatal mortality and maternal morbidity in Uttar Pradesh, India. In the trial, over 6300 deliveries were observed and over 153,000 mother-baby pairs across 120 study sites were followed to assess health outcomes. We designed and implemented a robust and integrated DQA system to sustain high-quality data throughout the trial. METHODS: We designed the Data Quality Monitoring and Improvement System (DQMIS) to reinforce six dimensions of data quality: accuracy, reliability, timeliness, completeness, precision, and integrity. The DQMIS was comprised of five functional components: 1) a monitoring and evaluation team to support the system; 2) a DQA protocol, including data collection audits and targets, rapid data feedback, and supportive supervision; 3) training; 4) standard operating procedures for data collection; and 5) an electronic data collection and reporting system. Routine audits by supervisors included double data entry, simultaneous delivery observations, and review of recorded calls to patients. Data feedback reports identified errors automatically, facilitating supportive supervision through a continuous quality improvement model. RESULTS: The five functional components of the DQMIS successfully reinforced data reliability, timeliness, completeness, precision, and integrity. The DQMIS also resulted in 98.33% accuracy across all data collection activities in the trial. All data collection activities demonstrated improvement in accuracy throughout implementation. Data collectors demonstrated a statistically significant (p = 0.0004) increase in accuracy throughout consecutive audits. The DQMIS was successful, despite an increase from 20 to 130 data collectors. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of widely disseminated data quality methods and standards for large RCT interventions in limited-resource settings, we developed an integrated DQA system, combining auditing, rapid data feedback, and supportive supervision, which ensured high-quality data and could serve as a model for future health systems research trials. Future efforts should focus on standardization of DQA processes for health systems research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02148952. Registered on 13 February 2014.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5590237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55902372017-09-13 Implementation and results of an integrated data quality assurance protocol in a randomized controlled trial in Uttar Pradesh, India Gass, Jonathon D. Misra, Anamika Yadav, Mahendra Nath Singh Sana, Fatima Singh, Chetna Mankar, Anup Neal, Brandon J. Fisher-Bowman, Jennifer Maisonneuve, Jenny Delaney, Megan Marx Kumar, Krishan Singh, Vinay Pratap Sharma, Narender Gawande, Atul Semrau, Katherine Hirschhorn, Lisa R. Trials Methodology BACKGROUND: There are few published standards or methodological guidelines for integrating Data Quality Assurance (DQA) protocols into large-scale health systems research trials, especially in resource-limited settings. The BetterBirth Trial is a matched-pair, cluster-randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the BetterBirth Program, which seeks to improve quality of facility-based deliveries and reduce 7-day maternal and neonatal mortality and maternal morbidity in Uttar Pradesh, India. In the trial, over 6300 deliveries were observed and over 153,000 mother-baby pairs across 120 study sites were followed to assess health outcomes. We designed and implemented a robust and integrated DQA system to sustain high-quality data throughout the trial. METHODS: We designed the Data Quality Monitoring and Improvement System (DQMIS) to reinforce six dimensions of data quality: accuracy, reliability, timeliness, completeness, precision, and integrity. The DQMIS was comprised of five functional components: 1) a monitoring and evaluation team to support the system; 2) a DQA protocol, including data collection audits and targets, rapid data feedback, and supportive supervision; 3) training; 4) standard operating procedures for data collection; and 5) an electronic data collection and reporting system. Routine audits by supervisors included double data entry, simultaneous delivery observations, and review of recorded calls to patients. Data feedback reports identified errors automatically, facilitating supportive supervision through a continuous quality improvement model. RESULTS: The five functional components of the DQMIS successfully reinforced data reliability, timeliness, completeness, precision, and integrity. The DQMIS also resulted in 98.33% accuracy across all data collection activities in the trial. All data collection activities demonstrated improvement in accuracy throughout implementation. Data collectors demonstrated a statistically significant (p = 0.0004) increase in accuracy throughout consecutive audits. The DQMIS was successful, despite an increase from 20 to 130 data collectors. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of widely disseminated data quality methods and standards for large RCT interventions in limited-resource settings, we developed an integrated DQA system, combining auditing, rapid data feedback, and supportive supervision, which ensured high-quality data and could serve as a model for future health systems research trials. Future efforts should focus on standardization of DQA processes for health systems research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02148952. Registered on 13 February 2014. BioMed Central 2017-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5590237/ /pubmed/28882167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2159-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology
Gass, Jonathon D.
Misra, Anamika
Yadav, Mahendra Nath Singh
Sana, Fatima
Singh, Chetna
Mankar, Anup
Neal, Brandon J.
Fisher-Bowman, Jennifer
Maisonneuve, Jenny
Delaney, Megan Marx
Kumar, Krishan
Singh, Vinay Pratap
Sharma, Narender
Gawande, Atul
Semrau, Katherine
Hirschhorn, Lisa R.
Implementation and results of an integrated data quality assurance protocol in a randomized controlled trial in Uttar Pradesh, India
title Implementation and results of an integrated data quality assurance protocol in a randomized controlled trial in Uttar Pradesh, India
title_full Implementation and results of an integrated data quality assurance protocol in a randomized controlled trial in Uttar Pradesh, India
title_fullStr Implementation and results of an integrated data quality assurance protocol in a randomized controlled trial in Uttar Pradesh, India
title_full_unstemmed Implementation and results of an integrated data quality assurance protocol in a randomized controlled trial in Uttar Pradesh, India
title_short Implementation and results of an integrated data quality assurance protocol in a randomized controlled trial in Uttar Pradesh, India
title_sort implementation and results of an integrated data quality assurance protocol in a randomized controlled trial in uttar pradesh, india
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5590237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28882167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2159-1
work_keys_str_mv AT gassjonathond implementationandresultsofanintegrateddataqualityassuranceprotocolinarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuttarpradeshindia
AT misraanamika implementationandresultsofanintegrateddataqualityassuranceprotocolinarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuttarpradeshindia
AT yadavmahendranathsingh implementationandresultsofanintegrateddataqualityassuranceprotocolinarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuttarpradeshindia
AT sanafatima implementationandresultsofanintegrateddataqualityassuranceprotocolinarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuttarpradeshindia
AT singhchetna implementationandresultsofanintegrateddataqualityassuranceprotocolinarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuttarpradeshindia
AT mankaranup implementationandresultsofanintegrateddataqualityassuranceprotocolinarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuttarpradeshindia
AT nealbrandonj implementationandresultsofanintegrateddataqualityassuranceprotocolinarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuttarpradeshindia
AT fisherbowmanjennifer implementationandresultsofanintegrateddataqualityassuranceprotocolinarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuttarpradeshindia
AT maisonneuvejenny implementationandresultsofanintegrateddataqualityassuranceprotocolinarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuttarpradeshindia
AT delaneymeganmarx implementationandresultsofanintegrateddataqualityassuranceprotocolinarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuttarpradeshindia
AT kumarkrishan implementationandresultsofanintegrateddataqualityassuranceprotocolinarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuttarpradeshindia
AT singhvinaypratap implementationandresultsofanintegrateddataqualityassuranceprotocolinarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuttarpradeshindia
AT sharmanarender implementationandresultsofanintegrateddataqualityassuranceprotocolinarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuttarpradeshindia
AT gawandeatul implementationandresultsofanintegrateddataqualityassuranceprotocolinarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuttarpradeshindia
AT semraukatherine implementationandresultsofanintegrateddataqualityassuranceprotocolinarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuttarpradeshindia
AT hirschhornlisar implementationandresultsofanintegrateddataqualityassuranceprotocolinarandomizedcontrolledtrialinuttarpradeshindia