Cargando…

Fixation Release and the Bone Bandaid: A New Bone Fixation Device Paradigm

The current gold standard of care for mandibular segmental defeat reconstruction is the use of Ti-6Al-4V immobilization hardware and fibular double barrel graft. This method is often successful immediately at restoring mandible function, however the highly stiff fixation hardware causes stress shiel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shayesteh Moghaddam, Narges, Jahadakbar, Ahmadreza, Amerinatanzi, Amirhesam, Skoracki, Roman, Miller, Michael, Dean, David, Elahinia, Mohammad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5590446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28952484
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering4010005
_version_ 1783262540984221696
author Shayesteh Moghaddam, Narges
Jahadakbar, Ahmadreza
Amerinatanzi, Amirhesam
Skoracki, Roman
Miller, Michael
Dean, David
Elahinia, Mohammad
author_facet Shayesteh Moghaddam, Narges
Jahadakbar, Ahmadreza
Amerinatanzi, Amirhesam
Skoracki, Roman
Miller, Michael
Dean, David
Elahinia, Mohammad
author_sort Shayesteh Moghaddam, Narges
collection PubMed
description The current gold standard of care for mandibular segmental defeat reconstruction is the use of Ti-6Al-4V immobilization hardware and fibular double barrel graft. This method is often successful immediately at restoring mandible function, however the highly stiff fixation hardware causes stress shielding of the grafted bone and stress concentration in the fixation device over time which can lead to fixation device failure and revision surgery. The purpose of reconstructive surgery could be to create normal stress trajectories in the mandible following engraftment. We investigate the use of a two stage mechanism which separates the immobilization/healing and regenerative phases of mandibular segmental defect treatment. The device includes the use of a very stiff, Ti-6Al-4V, releasable mechanism which assures bone healing. Therefore it could be released once the reconstructed boney tissue and any of its ligamentous attachments have completely healed. Underneath the released Ti-6Al-4V plate would be a pre-loaded nitinol (NiTi) wire-frame apparatus that facilitates the normal stress-strain trajectory through the engrafted bone after the graft is healed in place and the Ti-6Al-4V fixation device has been released. Due to the use of NiTi wires forming a netting that connects vascularized bone and possibly bone chips, bone grafts are also more likely to be incorporate rather than to resorb. We first evaluated a healthy adult mandible during normal mastication to obtain the normal stress-strain distribution. Then, we developed the finite element (FE) model of the mandibular reconstruction (in the M1-3 region) with the proposed fixation device during the healing (locked state) and post-healing (released state) periods. To recreate normal stress trajectory in the reconstructed mandible, we applied the Response Surface Methodology (RMS) to optimize the Bone Bandaid geometry (i.e., wire diameters and location). The results demonstrate that the proposed mechanism immobilizes the grafted bone in the locked state properly since the maximum resultant gap (21.54 micron) between the graft and host mandible surfaces are in the safe region (less than 300 micron). By considering the von Mises criteria for failure, FE analysis together with experimental studies (i.e., compressive and tensile testing on the inferior and superior fixation devices, respectively) confirm that the proposed fixation devices do not fail, showing safety factor of at least 10.3. Based on the Response Surface Methodology (RSM) technique, the optimal parameter values for the wires are achieved (0.65 mm and 1 mm for the superior and inferior wires, respectively) and the required level of preload on each wire are calculated (369.8 N and 229 N for the inferior and superior wires, respectively). The FE results for stress distribution on the reconstructed mandible during the released state closely match that of a healthy mandible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5590446
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55904462017-09-21 Fixation Release and the Bone Bandaid: A New Bone Fixation Device Paradigm Shayesteh Moghaddam, Narges Jahadakbar, Ahmadreza Amerinatanzi, Amirhesam Skoracki, Roman Miller, Michael Dean, David Elahinia, Mohammad Bioengineering (Basel) Article The current gold standard of care for mandibular segmental defeat reconstruction is the use of Ti-6Al-4V immobilization hardware and fibular double barrel graft. This method is often successful immediately at restoring mandible function, however the highly stiff fixation hardware causes stress shielding of the grafted bone and stress concentration in the fixation device over time which can lead to fixation device failure and revision surgery. The purpose of reconstructive surgery could be to create normal stress trajectories in the mandible following engraftment. We investigate the use of a two stage mechanism which separates the immobilization/healing and regenerative phases of mandibular segmental defect treatment. The device includes the use of a very stiff, Ti-6Al-4V, releasable mechanism which assures bone healing. Therefore it could be released once the reconstructed boney tissue and any of its ligamentous attachments have completely healed. Underneath the released Ti-6Al-4V plate would be a pre-loaded nitinol (NiTi) wire-frame apparatus that facilitates the normal stress-strain trajectory through the engrafted bone after the graft is healed in place and the Ti-6Al-4V fixation device has been released. Due to the use of NiTi wires forming a netting that connects vascularized bone and possibly bone chips, bone grafts are also more likely to be incorporate rather than to resorb. We first evaluated a healthy adult mandible during normal mastication to obtain the normal stress-strain distribution. Then, we developed the finite element (FE) model of the mandibular reconstruction (in the M1-3 region) with the proposed fixation device during the healing (locked state) and post-healing (released state) periods. To recreate normal stress trajectory in the reconstructed mandible, we applied the Response Surface Methodology (RMS) to optimize the Bone Bandaid geometry (i.e., wire diameters and location). The results demonstrate that the proposed mechanism immobilizes the grafted bone in the locked state properly since the maximum resultant gap (21.54 micron) between the graft and host mandible surfaces are in the safe region (less than 300 micron). By considering the von Mises criteria for failure, FE analysis together with experimental studies (i.e., compressive and tensile testing on the inferior and superior fixation devices, respectively) confirm that the proposed fixation devices do not fail, showing safety factor of at least 10.3. Based on the Response Surface Methodology (RSM) technique, the optimal parameter values for the wires are achieved (0.65 mm and 1 mm for the superior and inferior wires, respectively) and the required level of preload on each wire are calculated (369.8 N and 229 N for the inferior and superior wires, respectively). The FE results for stress distribution on the reconstructed mandible during the released state closely match that of a healthy mandible. MDPI 2017-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5590446/ /pubmed/28952484 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering4010005 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Shayesteh Moghaddam, Narges
Jahadakbar, Ahmadreza
Amerinatanzi, Amirhesam
Skoracki, Roman
Miller, Michael
Dean, David
Elahinia, Mohammad
Fixation Release and the Bone Bandaid: A New Bone Fixation Device Paradigm
title Fixation Release and the Bone Bandaid: A New Bone Fixation Device Paradigm
title_full Fixation Release and the Bone Bandaid: A New Bone Fixation Device Paradigm
title_fullStr Fixation Release and the Bone Bandaid: A New Bone Fixation Device Paradigm
title_full_unstemmed Fixation Release and the Bone Bandaid: A New Bone Fixation Device Paradigm
title_short Fixation Release and the Bone Bandaid: A New Bone Fixation Device Paradigm
title_sort fixation release and the bone bandaid: a new bone fixation device paradigm
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5590446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28952484
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering4010005
work_keys_str_mv AT shayestehmoghaddamnarges fixationreleaseandthebonebandaidanewbonefixationdeviceparadigm
AT jahadakbarahmadreza fixationreleaseandthebonebandaidanewbonefixationdeviceparadigm
AT amerinatanziamirhesam fixationreleaseandthebonebandaidanewbonefixationdeviceparadigm
AT skorackiroman fixationreleaseandthebonebandaidanewbonefixationdeviceparadigm
AT millermichael fixationreleaseandthebonebandaidanewbonefixationdeviceparadigm
AT deandavid fixationreleaseandthebonebandaidanewbonefixationdeviceparadigm
AT elahiniamohammad fixationreleaseandthebonebandaidanewbonefixationdeviceparadigm